Family Satyridae Boisduval, [1833]

 

I’m not agree with opinion of L.E.Miller (1968) and others that the taxon Satyridae has a subfamilic rank in the family Nymphalidae. These family-group taxa differ very good at the family level by the wing venation, genital structures and wing pattern. In the wing venation the general difference is the dicked basal parts of veins on the forewing in Satyridae; on the forewing of Satyridae the veins R₂ and R₃ – R₄ – R₅ lie as two different veins, in Nymphalidae these veins lie in one vein. Genital structures of Nymphalidae are more differenciered that in Satyridae, valves of Nymphalidae allwais have sklerotyzed structures, in Satyridae these structures never to present. Wing pattern of Satyridae (especially in the underside) is very primitiv; it’s only belts or rows of spots without good differentiation (this differentiation is only in some groups of Satyridae), in Nymphalidae the wing pattern has a good visible differentiation, belts or rows of points or spots are asymmetric and more reduced, some elements of pattern are transformed.

I think that many lepidopterists have very great value to the cladistic classification and cladistic analysis. But cladistic analysis don’t have the base for good taxonomic analysis on the family-group level and don’t give the base for the cladistic system (=classification) (see for example Proceedings of the Zoological Institut of Saint-Pétersbourg, 1994: “Principles and methods of the zoological classification”).

In phylogeny of Dytrisia which proposed by O.Shields (1989) was used the haploid chromosome number. This number in Nymphalidae sensu Shields is 31. But this number is correct only for Nymphalidae by old authors, in Satyridae this number is 28. So it’s not good symplesiomorphy.

A.Nel et al. (1993: 33) wrote: “Nous pouvons constater que trois sur quatre des “Satyridae” (sensu Miller) fossiles connus appartiennent aux Lethini qui est un groupe présentant des caractères relativement peu spécialisés par comparison avec les “Satyrinae” (sensu Miller). D’autre part, ces fossiles sont d’îge relativement récent (Oligocène) comparé а la grande ancienneté des Lepidoptera. Les premiers Papillons fossiles connus sont en effet datés du Jurassique supérieur. Cet ordre est apparu au Trias, en même temps que son groupe-frère: les Trichoptera. Ces Satyrinae fossiles n’apportent donc que peu de renseignements sur la phylogénie des Nymphalidae et des Papilionoidea. Ils sont nettement plus intéressants pour l’étude du paléoclimat de l’Oligocène et de la biogéographie des Lathini [sic!].” This is very important: in complex with primitiv genital structures, wing pattern and venation, the older than in Nymphalidae fossiles of Satyridae showed that Satyridae was an ancestral group for Nymphalidae, and Nymphalidae is a family which has progressiver characters than Satyridae.

 

Subfamily Elymniinae Herrich-Schäffer, 1864

Tribus Lethini Clark, 1948

 

Verzeichniss bekannter Schmett[er]linge, Augsburg, 4: 56. TS: Papilio europa Fabricius, 1775.

 

diana Butler, 1866 (Pararge). Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London, Zoology, 9: 55. TL: Japan, “Hakodad”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       diana Butler, 1866 (Pararge). D: South Ussuri district (Pyazanovka, Sukhanovka); South Sakhalin; Shikotan and Kunashir islands in Kuriles.

 

maacki Bremer, 1861 (Lasiommaa). Bulletin de la Academie des Sciences, Saint-Pétersbourg, 3: 549. TL: “Ussuri, zwischen dem Noor und der Ema”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       maacki Bremer, 1861 (Lasiommata). D: Amur district; Ussuri district (western border and southern part).

 

Genera of Diurnal Lepidoptera, Washingron: pl. 64. TS: Zophoessa sura Doubleday, [1849].

 

callipteris Butler, 1877 (Lethe). Annales of the Magazin of Natural History, London, (4) 19: 92. TL: Japan, “Tokei, Jedo”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          diluta Esaki & Nakahara, 1924 (Lethe). Ins. Ins. Menstr., 12: 56, fig. 3. TL: Japan, Hokkaido, Sapporo. Had been originally described as a subspecies of callipteris. D: South Kuriles and Sakhalin.

Lepidoptera Indica, London, 1 (12): 310. TS: Pronophilla schrenckii Ménétriès, 1858.

 

schrenckii Ménétriès, 1858 (Pronophilla). Bulletin de la physique et naturelle Academie de Sciences, Saint-Pétersbourg, 17: 215. TL: Bureya Mts. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       schrenckii Ménétriès, 1858 (Pronophilla). D: Amur district from Bureya river to Gorin river; Ussuri district; SW Sakhalin.

 

Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1866: 770. TS: Lasiommata bhadra Moore, 1857.

 

goschkevitschae Ménértiès, 1857 (Lasiommata). Enumeratio corporum animalium musei Petropolitanae, Petropoli, 2: 104, Tab. 10, fig. 4. TL: “Japon”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       goschkevitschae Ménétriès, 1857 (Lasiommata). D: Kunashir island in Kuriles.

 

niphonica Butler, 1881 (Neope). Annales of the Magazin of the Natural History, London, 7: 133. TL: “Japan”. Had been originally described as a good species.

Remark. The specific rank was given in Fujioka (1972).

·       niphonica Butler, 1881 (Neope). D: Sakhalin (southern part); Kuriles: Iturup and Kunashir islands.

 

Lepidoptera Indica, London, 2 (13): 14. TS: Lasiommata epimenides Ménétriès, 1859.

 

epaminondas Lang, 1884 (Pararge). Rhopalocera Europae descripta et delineata, London, 1: 328. TL: Blagovestshensk. Had been originally described as a variety of epimenides.

Remark. The specific rank by Dubatolov & Korshunov (1988).

·       epaminondas Lang, 1884 (Pararge). D: Amur district; Ussuri district.

 

epimenides Ménétriès in Schrenck, 1859 (Lasiommata). Reisen und Forschungen im Amur-Lande, 2: 39; pl. 3, fig. 3 – 9. TL: “Amur mer.” – by the lectotype designation (Dubatolov & Korshunov, 1988: 59). Had been originally described as a good species.

·       epimenides Ménétriès in Schrenck, 1859 (Lasiommata). D: East Transbaikal; Amur district; Ussuri district.

Tibus Parargini Tutt, 1896

Verzeichniss bekannter Schmett[er]linge, Augsburg, 4: 59. TS: Papilio aegeria Linnaeus, 1758.

 

aegeria Linnaeus, 1758 (Papilio). Systema Naturae... (ed. 10), 1: 473. TL: South Europa and North Afrika. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       tircis Godart, 1821 (Satyrus). Histoire naturelle des Lépidoptères ou Papillons de France, Paris, 1: 163; pl. 8, fig. 1. TL: Paris. Had been originally described as a good species. D: European part (without north); Middle and South Ural.

 

Lepidoptera Indica, London, 2 (13): 14. TS: Pararge dumetorum Oberthür, 1866.

 

achine Scopoli, 1763 (Papilio). Entomologia carniorica exhibens Insecta Carnioliae indugena et distributa in ordines, genera, species, varietates. Methodo Linnaeana, Vindobonae: 156. TL: “Karnten”: Carinthia in Austria. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       achine Scopoli, 1763 (Papilio). D: European part; South Siberia; Caucasus.

·       euximia Staudinger, 1892 (Pararge). Deutsche entomologische Zeitschrift Iris, Berlin, 5: 337. TL: Partizansk and Askold Island in Ussuri region. Had been originally described as a variety of achine. D: South of Far East.

·       karafutonis Matsumura, 1919 (Pararge). Thous. Ins. Jap. Add., 3: 28. TL: “Saghalien”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of achine. D: Sakhalin.

·       kurilensis Matsumura, 1928 (Pararge). Insecta Matsumurana, Sapporo, 2 (4): 191, 193. TL: Shikotan Island. Had been originally described as a subspecies of achine. D: South Kuriles.

 

deidamia Eversmann, 1851 (Hipparchia). Bulletin de la Société des Naturalistes de Moscou, 24: 617. TL: “le gouvernement d’Irkoutzk de la Sibйrie orientale”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       deidamia Eversmann, 1851 (Hipparchia). D: Taiga of Asiatic part; South Siberia; Amur district; middle Far East/

·       evdokimovi Korb, 1997 (Lopinga). Lambillionea, Bruxelles, 97: 519; Abbn. 1, 2. TL: “Südural, Bolschoj Taganaj-Gebirge”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of deidamia. D: South and Middle Ural.

·       sachalinensis Matsumura, 1911 (Pararge). Journal of the College of Agriculture of Imperial University of Sapporo, 4: 45. TL: Sakhalin: “Solowiyovka, Tonnaitcha”. Had been originally described as a variety of deidamia. D: Sakhalin.

 

Type species: Pararga eversmanni Eversmann, 1847.

 

 

eversmanni Eversmann, 1847 (Hipparchia). Bulletin de la Société des Naturalistes de Moscou, 20 (3): pl. 2, fig. 5, 6. TL: “Dshungarischer Alatau” (Lukhtanov & Lukhtanov, 1994: 75). Had been originally described as a good species.

·       cashmirensis Moore, 1874 (Pararge). Proceedings of the scientific meetings of the Zoological Society of London, 1874: 265 – 266; pl. 43, fig. 3. TL: “Goolmurg, Cashmere”. Had been originally described as a good species. D: Pamir; Darvaz.

·       evdokimovi Korb 2005 . D: West Tian Shan.

·       eversmanni Eversmann, 1847 (Hipparchia). D: North and Inner Tian Shan; Dzhungaria; ?Tarbagatai.

·       unicolor Grum-Grshimailo, 1893 (Pararge). Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, Sankt-Petersburg, 27: 384. TL: “Buchara orientali (Karategin, Baldshuan)”. Had been originally described as a variety of eversmanni.  D: Kopet Dagh; Gissar; Alai.

 

British Butterflies and their transformations, London, 1: 65. TS: Papilio megera Linné, 1767.

 

adrastoides Bienert, 1870 (Pararga). Lepidopterologische Ergebnisse einer Reisen in Persien in den Jahren 1858 und 1859, Leipzig: 30. TL: “Siaret” – by the lectotype (Nekrutenko, 1990: 116). Had been originally described as a variety of maera.

·       adrastoides Bienert, 1870 (Pararga). D: Talysh in Transcaucasus.

 

maera Linnaeus, 1758 (Papilio). Systema Naturae... (ed. 10), 1: 473. TL: Sweden. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       abastumana Sheljuzhko, 1937 (Pararge). Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstage von Prof. Dr. Embrik Strand, Riga, 2: 345. TL: “Abastuman” – by the lectotype (Nekrutenko, 1990: 114). Had been originally described as a subspecies of  maera. D:  Small Caucasus; Transcaucasus.

·       crimaea A.Bang-Haas, 1907 (Pararge), stat. rest. Deutsche entomologische Zeitschrift Iris, 20: 69. TL: Crimea. Had been originally described as a subspecies of maera. D: Crimea.

·       jachontovi Sheljuzhko, 1937 (Pararge). Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstage von Prof. Dr. Embrik Strand, Riga, 2: 343. TL: “Kislovodsk” – by the lectotype (Nekrutenko, 1990: 114). Had been originally described as a subspecies of maera. D: Great Caucasus.

·       maera Linnaeus, 1758 (Papilio). D: European part; Kazakhstan; Kopet Dagh; North Tian Shan; Dzhungaria; Altai.

·       weiwuerica Huang & Murayama, 1992 (Lasiommata). Tyô to Ga, Tokyo, 43: 5; figs. 13, 14. TL: “Jiadengyu, Altai, 1400 – 1700 m, grassland in forest zone”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of maera. D: SW Altai.

 

megera Linné, 1767 (Papilio). Systema Naturae... (ed. 12), 1: 771. TL: Austria. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       megera Linné, 1767 (Papilio). D: South of European part; Caucasus; Transcaucasus; Kopet Dagh; Kazakhstan; North Tian Shan (mountain ridges Kirghizsky Ala-Too and Transili Alatau); Dzhungaria; Crimea.

 

menava Moore, 1865 (Lasiommata). Proceedinds of the Zoological Society of London, 1865: 499; pl. 30, fig. 3. TL: “Middle Kunawur”. Had been originally described as a god species.

·       menava Moore, 1865 (Lasiommata). D: Mountains of Middle Asia.

·       nasshreddini Christoph, 1877 (Pararge). Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, Sankt-Petersburg, 12: 240; Tab. 5, fig. 13, 14. TL: Shakhrud. Had been originally described as a good species. D: Transcaucasus in the Ordubad vicinity.

 

petropolitana Fabricius, 1787 (Papilio). Mantissa Insectorum, 2: 36. TL: Saint-Pétersbourg. Had been originally described as a variety of maera.

·       petropolitana Fabricius, 1787 (Papilio). D: European part; Caucasus; Transcaucasus; Kazakhstan; Southern Siberia; Southern Far East.

 

Vestnik zoologii, Kiev, 1988 (1): 50 [nom. subst. pro Esperia Nekrutenko, 1987, non Hübner, [1825] et Esperella Nekrutenko, 1987, non G.Vosmaer in Bronn, 1885. TS: Papilio climene Esper, [1783].

 

climene Esper, [1783] (Papilio). Die Schmetterlinge in Abbildungen nach der Natur mit Beschreibungen, Erlangen, 1: 165; Tab. 85, Fig. 1 – 3. TL: “Gegenden der Wolga”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       climene Esper, [1783] (Papilio). D: South of European part.

·       roxandra Herrich-Schäffer, [1850] (Satyrus). Systematische Bearbeitung der Schmetterlinge von Europa, zugleich als Text, Revision und Supplement zu Jakob Hübner’s Sammlung europäischer Schmetterlinge, Regensurg, 6: Tab. 99, Fig. 471 – 473. TL: “Helenendorf” (Nekrutenko, 1990: 109). Had been originally described as a variety of climene. D: Caucasus; Transcaucasus.

 

Subfamily Melanargiinae Wheeler, 1903

Tribus Melanargiini Wheeler, 1903

 

Systematische Beschreibung der europäischen Schmetterlinge; mit Abbildungen auf Steintafeln, Aachen; Leipzig, 1 (3): 97. TS: Papilio galathea Linnaeus, 1758.

 

epimede Staudinger, 1887 ([Melanargia]). Mémoires sur les Lépidoptères, Saint-Pétersbourg, 3: 147; pl. 16, fig. 10. TL: “Raddefka”. Had been originally described as a variety of [halimede].

·       epimede Staudinger, 1887 (Melanargia). D: Amur district (from Zea river to Gorin river); Ussuri district.

 

galathea Linnaeus, 1758 (Papilio). Systema Naturae... (ed. 10), 1: 474. TL: Europa. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       donsa Fruhstorfer, 1917 (Melanargia). Archiv Naturgeschichten, A 82: 22. TL: “Tiflis”. Had been originally described as a forma of galathea. D: Transcaucasus; southern slope of Great Caucasus.

·       galathea Linnaeus, 1758 (Papilio). D: European part northwards to the Nizhny Novgorod region; South Ural.

·       njurdzhan Sheljuzhko, 1937 (Melanargia). Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstage von Prof. Dr. Embrik Strand, Riga, 2: 322. TL: “Teberda” – by the lectotype (Nekrutenko, 1990: 121). Had been originally described as a subspecies of galathea. D: Northern slope of Great Caucasus.

 

halimede Ménétriès, 1859 (Arge). Bulletin de la Academie des Sciences, Saint-Pétersbourg, 17: 216. TL: “Montagnes de Chingan, et sur les rives de la riviere Sakhalin, ou partie superieure du fleuve Amour, jusqu’aux montagnes de Geonz”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       halimede Ménétriès, 1859 (Arge). D: Transbaikal; Ussuri district; Amur district.

 

hylata Ménétriès, 1832 (Satyrus). Catalogue raisonné des objets de zoologie recueillis dans un voyage au Caucase et jusqu’alors frontiиres actuelles de la Perse, enterpris par ordre de S.M.Empereur, Saint-Pétersbourg: 251. TL: “Taliisch” – by the lectotype (Nekrutenko, 1990: 126). Had been originally described as a good species.

·       hylata Ménétriès, 1832 (Satyrus). D: Transcaucasus: Talysh, mountain ridges Karadag, Zagros, Elburs, southern slope of Zangezursky Mts.

 

larissa Geyer in Hübner, [1827] (Papilio). Sammlung europäischer Schmetterlinge, Augsburg: Tab. 182, Fig. 896 – 899. TL: “Cres. Kroatien”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       astanda Staudinger, 1871 (Melanargia). Catalog der Lepidopteren des europaeischen Faunengebietes, Dresden (ed. 2): 23. TL: “[Helenendorf]”, “[Goektschai]”. Had been originally described as a variety of larissa. D: Transcaucasus from Kura valley to the border with Turkey.

·       hertina Staudinger, 1901 (Melanargia). Catalog der Lepidopteren des palaearktischen Faunengebietes, Dresden (ed. 3), 1: 42. TL: “Achalzich”. Had been originally described as a variety of larissa. D: Gruzien: districts of Akhalzikh and Aspindz.

 

parce Staudinger in Staudinger & Bang-Haas, 1882 (Melanargia). Berliner entomologische Zeitschrift, 26: 170. TL: Margelan. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       lucida Staudinger, 1886 (Melanargia). Stettiner entomologische Zeitschrift, 47: 226. TL: “Südliches Alai”. Had been originally described as a variety of parce. D: Alai; Gissar; Darvaz.

·       parce Staudinger in Staudinger & Bang-Haas, 1882 (Melanargia). D: Tian Shan.

 

russiae Esper, [1786] (Papilio). Die Schmetterlinge in Abbildungen nach der Natur mit Beschreibungen, Erlangen, 1 (2): 162; Tab. 84, Fig. 1, 2. TL: Sevastjanovka in the Pensa region. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       caucasica Nordmann, 1851 (Arge). Bulletin de la Société impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou, 24: 403; Tab. 1, Fig. 1 – 3. TL: “Helenendorf” – by the lectotype (Wagener, 1975: 49). Had been originally described as a variety of hertha. D: Small Caucasus; Transcaucasus.

·       valarauko Korb 2005 ssp.n. D: Northern part of its areal in European part of Russia.

·       russiae Esper, [1786] (Papilio). D: European part (southern and central part); Caucasus; West Siberia (steppes); Kazakhstan; Altai; Sayan; North Tian Shan; Dzhungaria.

 

teneates Ménétriès, 1832 (Satyrus). Catalogue raisonné des objets de zoologie recueillis dans un voyage au Caucase et jusqu’alors frontiиres actuelles de la Perse, enterpris par ordre de S.M.Empereur, Saint-Pétersbourg: 252. TL: “Taliisch” – by the lectotype (Nekrutenko, 1990: 126). Had been originally described as a good species.

·       teneates Ménétriès, 1832 (Satyrus). D: Talish and Gilan vicinity in Transcaucasus.

 

 

 

Subfamily Coenonymphinae Tutt, 1896

Tribus Ypthimini Miller, 1969

 

Zutrage der Sammlung exotischer Schmetterlinge, Augsburg: 17. TS: Ypthima huebneri Kirby, 1871.

 

moschulskyi Bremer & Grey, 1852 (Satyrus). Etudes Entomologiques, 6: 60. TL: China near Peking (by the lectotype (Dubatolov & Lvovsky, 1997: 192). Had been originally described as a good species.

·       amphithea Ménétriès in Schrenck, 1859 (Ypthyma). Reisen und Forschungen im Amur-Lande, Sankt-Petersburg, 2 (1): 106. TL: “sur les rives du Sungari non loin de sa joncion avec l’Amour”. Had been originally described as a good species. D: Ussuri district to Khabarovsk.

 

argus Butler, 1866 (Ypthima). Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London, 9: 56. TL: Japan, Honsu. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       hampeia Fruhstorfer in Seiz, [1911] (Ypthima). Die Gross-Schmetterlinge der Erde, Stuttgart, 9: 290. TL: Ussuri. Had been originally described as a subspecies argus. D: Ussuri district; Amur district from Zea river to Gorin river.

·       jesoensis Matsumura, 1919 (Ypthima). Matsumuriana, Sapporo, 1: 1. TL: Japan: Hokkaido, “Jozankei”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of argus. D: Kunashir Island.

 

Stettiner entomologische Zeitschrift, 11: 311. TS: Papilio tircis Stoll in Cramer, [1782].

 

dohrnii Zeller, 1850 (Triphysa). Stettiner entomologische Zeitschrift, 11: 308. TL: “aus Südsibirien” (Lukhtanov & Lukhtanov, 1994: 89). Had been originally described as a good species.

·       albovenosa Ershov, 1885 (Triphysa). Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, Sankt-Petersburg, 12: 336. TL: Blagovestshensk. Had been originally described as a good species. D: Amur district; Ussuri district; Transbaikal.

·       dohrnii Zeller, 1850 (Triphysa). D: Altai; Sayan; Praebaikal.

·       sacha Korshunov, 1996 (Triphysa). Dopolnenija i ispravlenija k knige “Dnevnye babochki asiatskoj chasti Rossii”, Novosibirsk: 30 – 31. TL: “Якутск, ботсад” [Yakutsk, botanic gardin]. . Had been originally described as a subspecies of albovenosa. D: Naerlena plateau.

·       tscherskii Grum-Grshimailo, 1899 (Triphysa). Annales Musei Zoologici, Saint-Pétersbourg, 4: 461. TL: “Olenek, Tomba, Alakit, Werchojansk, Jakutsk”. . Had been originally described as a variety of phryne. D: East Siberia; West Chukotka; Transural (north).

 

glacialis A.Bang-Haas, 1912 (Triphysa). Deutsche entomologische Zeitschrift Iris, 26: 105. TL: “Arasagun-Gol”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       glacialis A.Bang-Haas, 1912 (Triphysa). D: South Siberian mountains.

 

phryne Pallas, 1771 (Papilio). Reisen durch verschieden Provinzen des Russischen Reichs in den Jahren 1768 – 1774, Sankt-Petersburg, 1: 572. TL: Volga (South Russia). . Had been originally described as a good species.

·       phryne Pallas, 1771 (Papilio). D: SE European part; South Ural; southern part of West Siberia.

·       striatula Elwes, 1899 (Triphysa). Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London, 1899: 365. TL: “between the Kurai and Bashkaus”. Had been originally described as a variety of phryne. D: Altai.

·       ssp? D: Transili Alatau.

 

Verzeichniss bekannter Schmett[er]linge, Augsburg, 1: 65. TS: Papilio geticus Esper, [1793].

 

amaryllis Stoll in Cramer, 1782 (Papilio). Uitleven Kap., 4: Tab. 391 A, B. TL: “de la Siberie”. . Had been originally described as a good species.

·       rinda Ménétriès, 1859 (Coenonympha). Bull. phys. Acad. St.-Petersb. 3 (1): 106. TL: “rives sepentrionales de l’Amour”. Had been originally described as a good species. D: Amur region.

·       amaryllis Stoll in Cramer, 1782 (Papilio). D: South Siberia (to Praebaikal); South Transural; South Ural.

·       borisovi Korshunov & Ivonin in Korshunov, 1996 (Coenonympha). Dopolnenija i ispravlenija k knige “Dnevnye babochki asiatskoj chasti Rossii”, Novosibirsk: 31. TL: “Байкал, п. Листвянка” [Baikal, Listvjanka]. . Had been originally described as a subspecies of amaryllis. D: Praebaikal.

 

arcania Linnaeus, 1758 (Papilio). Fauna Svecica: 273. TL: Sweden.  Had been originally described as a good species.

·       arcania Linnaeus, 1758 (Papilio). D: European part.

·       caucasica Jachontov, 1914 (Coenonympha). Revue Russe d’Entomologie, Moscow, 14: 298. TL: “Zhelesnovodsk”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of arcania. D: Caucasus; Transcaucasus.

 

decolorata Wagner, 1913 (Coenonympha). Entomologische Mitteilungen, 2: 189; Fig. 15. TL: Tushkantau Mts., Burkhan valley. Had been originally described as a good species. D: TL.

Remark. V. & A.Lukhtanov (1994) in his book wrote: “Die von Wagner (1913) nach 4 ♂♂ aus dem Tyschkantau-Gebirge (Burchan-Schlucht) beschriebene C. decolorata wurde danach niemals wieder gesammelt. Sie hat sowohl Ähnlichkeit mit C. mahometana als auch mit C. sunbecca, die beide im Tyschkantau-Gebirge im Juni in denselben Biotopen fliegen. Wahrscheinlich handelt es sich nur um eine Hybride [C. mahometana X C. sunbecca]” (opus citato: 85). But we don’t have now a base for the “destruction” of this species, so I give it here as a good species.

 

glycerion Borkhausen, 1788 (Papilio). Naturgeschichte der europäischen Schmetterlinge nach systematischer  Ordnung: Tagschmetterlinge, Frankfurt, 1: 90. TL: South Germany. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       alta Sheljuzhko, 1937 (Coenonympha). Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstage von Prof. Dr. Embrik Strand, Riga, 2: 352. TL: “Teberda" – by the lectotype (Nekrutenko, 1990: 130). Had been originally described as a subspecies of iphis [Denis & Schiffermüller], [1775]. D: Great and Small Caucasus.

·       beljaevi Dubatolov, 1997 (Coenonympha). Far Eastern Entomologist, Vladivostok, 44: 8 – 10; fig. 21 – 28. TL: South Ussuri region. Had been originally described as a subspecies of glycerion. D: South Ussuri region.

·       glycerion Borkhausen, 1788 (Papilio). D: European part; Ural; West Siberia.

·       iphicles Staudinger, 1892 (Coenonympha). Deutsche entomologische Zeitschrift Iris, 5: 338. TL: “Kentei”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of iphis. D: East Kazakhstan; Altai; Sayan; Praebaikal; Transbaikal; Tuva; Amur district; Ussuri district.

·       iphina Staudinger, 1892 (Coenonympha). Deutsche entomologische Zeitschrift Iris, 5: 339. TL: Tarbagatai. Had been originally described as a subspecies of iphis. D: Tarbagatai; Dzhungaria.

·       korshunovi Nekrutenko, 1978 (Coenonympha). Doklady Akademii Nauk  Ukrainskoj SSR, Seria B, Kiev, 1978 (7): 646. TL: “Ай-Петринскаяяйла, Крым” [Aj-Petrinskaja jajla, Crimea]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of amynthas Poda, 1761. D: Crimea.

 

hero Linnaeus, 1761 (Papilio). Fauna Svecica: 274. TL: South Sweden. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       hero Linnaeus, 1761 (Papilio). D: European part; Ural.

·       perseis Lederer, 1853 (Coenonympha). Verhandlungen des zoologisch-botanischen Vereins, Wien, 3: 360. TL: “in den Vorbergen des Altai zwischen Ust-Kamenogorsk und Ustbuchtarminsk am Irtisch”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of hero. D: Siberia; Amur district; Ussuri district; Sakhalin; South Kuril Islands.

 

mixturata Alphéraky, 1897 (Coenonympha). Mémoires sur les Lépidoptères, Saint-Pétersbourg, 9: 326. TL: “Kamtschatka”. Had been originally described as a variety of tiphon Rottemburg, 1775.

·          mixturata Alphéraky, 1897 (Coenonympha). D: Kamchatka.

 

leander Esper, [1784] (Papilio). Die Schmetterlinge in Abbildungen nach der Natur mit Beschreibungen, Erlangen, 1 (2): 176; Tab. 89, fig. 5. TL: “Steppen an der Wolga”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       leander Esper, [1784] (Papilio). D: Southern part of European part; South Ural; south-west of West Siberia; Caucasus; Transcaucasus.

 

mahometana Alphéraky, 1881 (Coenonympha). Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, Sankt-Petersburg, 16: 428. TL: “Kounguesse”. Had been originally described as a variety of iphis.

·       acelae Hanus, 1996 (Coenonympha). Atalanta, Würzburg, 27: 208; col. pl. 4, figs. 10 – 12. [= aceli Hanus, 1996: 456, syn.n. – unjustified emendation, junior objective synonym]. TL: “Kirghizia, Dolon Pass, 2800 m”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of mahometana.  D: Inner Tian Shan.

·       mahometana Alphéraky, 1881 (Coenonympha). D: North Tian Shan westwards to Bishkek; East Tian Shan.

 

mongolica Alphéraky, 1881 (Coenonympha). Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, Sankt-Petersburg, 16: 426; Tab. 15, Fig. 26. TL: “Kouldjа”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       mongolica Alphéraky, 1881 (Coenonympha). D: Mountains in the Ili valley; East Dzhungaria; very rare in western parts of Kungey Ala-Too and Terskey Ala-Too mountain ridges; Ketmen Mts.

 

nolckeni Erschoff in Fedrschenko, 1874 (Coenonympha). Reise nach Turkestan, 2, 5 (7) (Lepidoptera): 23; Taf. 2, Fig. 17. TL: “in monte Naubid in Turkestano Rossico”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       nolckeni Erschoff in Fedtschenko, 1874 (Coenonympha). D: Alai; Gissar; Darvaz.

 

oedippus Fabricius, 1787 (Papilio). Mantissa Insectorum, 2: 31. TL: “in Russia australiori”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       amurensis Heyne in Rühl, [1894] (Coenonympha). Die palaearktischen Grossschmetterlinge und ihre Naturgeschichte. Tagfalter, Leipzig, 1: 607. TL: “Amur”. Had been originally described as a variety of oedippus. D: Transbaikal; Amur district; Ussuri district.

·       antioedippus Korb 2005. D: Altai; Tuva; Sayan; Praebaikal.

·       oedippus Fabricius, 1787 (Papilio). D: Southern part of forest and forest-steppe zone of European part.

                                                                                                                           

pamphilus Linnaeus, 1758 (Papilio). Systema Naturae... (ed. 10), 1: 472. TL: Sweden. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       lyllus Esper, [1805] (Papilio). Die Schmetterlinge in Abbildungen nach der Natur mit Beschreibungen, Erlangen, Suppl. 1: 23; Tab. 122, Fig. 1. TL: Portugal. Had been originally described as a good species. D: European part; Crimea; Caucasus; Transcaucasus; Kopet Dagh; Middle Asia (without Pamir); Alati.

 

saadi Kollar in Kollar & Redtenbacher, 1849 (Satyrus). Ueber den Charakter der Insekten-Fauna von Südpersien, Vienna: 11. TL: “Armenia” – by the lectotype (Nekrutenko, 1990: 134). Had been originally described as a good species.

·       saadi Kollar in Kollar & Redtenbacher, 1849 (Satyrus). D: Arid, halbdesert and desert biotopes of Southern Transcaucasus (southwards Kura river).

 

jiadengyuica Huang & Murayama, 1992 (Coenonympha). Tyô to Ga, Tokyo, 43: 5 – 6; fig. 15. TL: “Jiadengyu, Altai, 1380 m, grassland in forest zone”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of semenovi.

·          jiadengyuica Huang & Murayama, 1992 (Coenonympha). D: Ukok plateau in SW Altai (southern part).

 

sunbecca Eversmann, 1843 (Hipparchia). Bulletin de la Société des Naturalistes de Moscou, 16: 538; Tab. 7, fig. 4. TL: “Dshungarische Alatau” (Lukhtanov & Lukhtanov, 1994: 83). Had been originally described as a good species.

·       alexandra Heyne in Rühl, 1894 (Coenonympha). Die palaearktischen Grossschmetterlinge und ihre Naturgeschichte. Tagfalter, Leipzig, 1: 624. TL: Kirghiz Mts. Had been originally described as a variety of sunbecca. D: North Tian Shan; West Tian Shan; Inner Tian Shan; Alai; Gissar.

· ptach Korb 2005. D: Kirghiz Mts.

·       sunbecca Eversmann, 1843 (Coenonympha). D: Dzhungaria.

Remark. Unfortunately, the lack of a material from Gissar and Darvaz does not allow me to speak about real taxonomic status of local populations of C. sunbecca. It is possible to assume, however, proceeding from differences, noticed on an available material, of pattern of wings (in particular, displacement of spots of submarginal and postdiscal rows on the bottom party of wings inside), that gissaric and darvazic C. sunbecca are close to alexandra, but independent subspecies.

 

symphita Lederer, 1870 (Coenonympha). Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, Sankt-Petersburg, 8: 44. TL: “Achalzich” – by the lectotype (Nekrutenko, 1990: 131). Had been originally described as a good species.

·       karsiana Sheljuzhko, 1929 (Coenonympha). Mitteilungen der Münchener entomologischen Gesellschaft, 19: 351. TL: “Prov. Kars / Sarykamysch” – by the lectotype (Nekrutenko, 1990: 131). Had been originally described as a subspecies of symphita. D: Transcaucasus; Little Caucasus.

 

tullia Müller, 1764 (Papilio). Fauna insectorum Fridrichsdalina: 36. TL: “Fridrichsdal”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       caeca Staudinger, 1886 (Coenonympha). Stettiner entomologische Zeitschrift, 47: 251. TL: “Namangan”. Had been originally described as a good species. D: North Tian Shan (without Kirghiz Mts.).

·       chatiparae Sheljuzhko, 1937 (Coenonympha). Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstage von Prof. Dr. Embrik Strand, Riga, 2: 353. TL: “Teberda” – by the lectotype (Nekrutenko, 1990: 129). Had been originally described as a subspecies of tiphon. D: Great Caucasus.

·       elwesi Davenport, 1941 (Coenonympha). Bulletin of the Museum comparative zoology of the Harvard College, 87: 249. TL: Chuya in Altai. Had been originally described as a  subspecies of tullia.  D: Altai.

·       eupompus Stauder, 1924 (Coenonympha). Internationale entomologische Zeitschrift, Guben, 17: 152. TL: Ili region. Had been originally described as a forma of pamphilus. D: Dzhungaria; Ili valley.

·       fridolini Kusnezov in Davenport, 1941 (Coenonympha). Bulletin of the Museum comparative zoology of the Harvard College, 87: 256. TL: “Ganju River and the Pae-ör Range, Polar Ural”. Had been originally described as a form of tullia. D: Polar Ural.

·       subcaeca Heyne in Rühl, 1894 (Coenonympha). Die palaearktischen Grossschmetterlinge und ihre Naturgeschichte. Tagfalter, Leipzig, 1: 827. TL: “Südliches Sibirien”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of caeca. D:  Tuva; Praebaikal; Transbaikal.

·       timanensis Sedykh, 1977 (Coenonympha). Geograficheskie aspeky okhrany flory i fauny, Sykyvkar: 102. TL: Ukhta in Komi Republic. D: Middle Ural.

·       tiphon Rottemburg, 1775 (Papilio). Naturforscher, Halle, 6: 15. TL: Halle. D: European part (center and north).

·       tshonkurtshakus Korb, 1999 (Coenonympha). Alexanor, Paris, 20 (7): 387 – 388; figs. 1, 2. TL: “ Kirghizistan, monts Alexandre (= Kyrgyz Ala-Toosu, Kirghizskogo khrebet), Vallée du Tchon-Kuurtchak (= Chon-Kuurchak) (3500 – 3700 m)”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of tullia. D: Kirghiz Mts.

·       viluiensis Ménétriès, 1859 (Coenonympha). Bulletin de la physique Academie, Saint-Pétersbourg, 17: 215. TL: Vilui river. Had been originally described as a variety of tiphon. D: Chukotka; Central Siberia.

 

 

Subfamily Erebiinae Doherty, 1886

Tribus Erebiini Doherty, 1886

 

Annales of the Magazin of the Natural History, London, (8) 1: 60. TS: Erebia myops Staudinger, 1881.

 

myops Staudinger, 1881 (Erebia). Stettiner entomologische Zeitschrift, 42: 296. TL: “Ala Tau”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       mangystavica V.Lukhtanov in Lukhtanov & Lukhtanov, 1994 (Lyela). Herbipoliana, Marktleuthen, 3: 118. TL: “Westkasachstan, Mangyschlak-Halbinsel, Sharmysh (25 km E Schepte), 300 m”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of myops. D: Mangyshlak peninsula.

·       myops Staudinger, 1881 (Erebia). D: Tian Shan.

·       tekkensis Staudinger, 1886 (Erebia). Stettiner entomologische Zeitschrift, 47: 241. TL: Tekkes. Had been originally described as a as a variety of myops. D: Kopet Dagh; Kugitangtau and Babatag mountain ridges.

 

Mitteilungen der Münchener entomologischen Gesellschaft, 70: 11. TS: Papilio phegea Borkhausen, 1788 (Koçak, 1981 b).

 

afra Fabricius, 1787 (Papilio). Mantissa Insectorum, 2: 41. TL: South Russia. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       afra Fabricius, 1787 (Papilio). D: South European part; steppes of Kazakhstan; Caucasus; Transcaucasus; Altai.

·       krymaea Sheljuzhko, 1929 (Erebia). Mitteilungen der Münchener entomologischen Gesellschaft, 19: 348; Fig. 2. TL: Jaltinskaya Jayla, Crimea. Had been originally described as a subspecies of afra. D: Crimea.

·       transcaspica Goltz, 1930 (Ereboformia). Entomologische Zeitschrift, Frankfurt am Main, 44: 143. TL: North Iran. Had been originally described as a subspecies of afra.  D: Kopet Dagh.

 

Entomological Record, London, 12: 233 [nota]. TS: Papilio parmenio Boeber, 1809.

 

parmenio Boeber, 1809 (Papilio). Mémoires de la Société des Naturalistes de Moscou, 2: 306; Tab. 19. TL: Baikal. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       parmenio Boeber, 1809 (Papilio). D: South Siberian mountains; Amur district; Lena plateau; East Yakutia.

 

K. Swenska Vetensk Akad. Handliae, Stokholm, 1: 58. TS: Papilio ligea Linnaeus, 1758.

 

aethiops Esper, [1777] (Papilio). Die Schmetterlinge in Abbildungen nach der Natur mit Beschreibungen, Erlangen, 1: 312; Tab. 25, Fig. 3. TL: “Suddeutschland”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       aethiops Esper, [1777] (Papilio). D: European part (middle and southern part).

·       melusina Herrich-Schäffer, [1847] (Erebia). Systematische Bearbeitung der Schmetterlinge von Europa, Augsburg, 6: 10; Tab. 77, Fig. 373, 374. TL: “aus dem Kaukasus”. Had been originally described as a good species. D: Caucasus; Transcaucasus.

·       uralensis Goltz in Seitz, [1931] (Erebia). Die Gross-Schmetterlinge der Erde, Stuttgart, Suppl. 1: 146. TL: “Ural”. D: Altai; South-West Siberia; Sayan; Middle and South Ural.

 

ajanensis Ménétriès, 1857 (Erebia). Enumeratio corporum animalium musei Petropolitanae, Petropoli, 2: 104. TL: “Ajan”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          ajanensis Ménétriès, 1857 (Erebia). D: Altai; Sayan; Tuva; Praebaikal; Amur district

·       kosterini P.Gorbunov, Korshunov & Dubatolov in Korshunov & Gorbunov, 1995 (Erebia). Dnevnye babochki asiatckoj chasti Rossii, Ekaterinburg: 123. TL: “Магаданскаяобл., п-овКони, низовьяр. Хинджа” [Magadan region, Koni peninsula, Khindzha river under course]. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       ssp? D: Magadan region: Palatka, Karamken.

 

anyuica Kurentzov, 1966 (Erebia). Novye vidy fauny Sibirin i prilegayustshikh regionov, Novosibirsk: 34 – 35; ris. 1, 2. TL: Kolyma river basin: Anyusky Mts. The neoype designation of S.Korb is invalid (Korb, 1999 a: 1368) because the holotype present. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       anyuica Kurentzov, 1966 (Erebia). D: Anyujsky Mts. in East Siberia.

·       argentea Churkin, 2003 (Ererbia). Helios, Moscow, 4: 206 – 207; fig. 1, pl. 13, figs. 16 – 18. TL: “Kamchatka, Elisovskyi Distr., Petropavlovsk vic., Avachinskyi volcano, 200 m”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of anyuica. D: Kamchatka.

·       occultoides Korb, 1999 (Erebia). Zoological Journal, Moscow, 78 (11): 1368 – 1369; fig. 2, 2. TL: «Магаданскаяобл., окрестностипос. Палатка» [Magadan reg., Palatka vicinity]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of anyuica. D: middle district of Magadan reg.

 

callias Edwards, 1871 (Erebia). Transactions of the American entomological Society, Philadelphia, 3: 274. TL: “Colorado”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       altajana Staudinger, 1901 (Erebia). Catalog der Lepidopteren des palaearktischen Faunengebietes, Dresden, (ed. 3): 50. TL: “Alt[ai]”. Had been originally described as a variety of tyndarus Esper, [1781]. D: North Altai.

·       sibirica Staudinger, 1881 (Erebia). Stettiner entomologische Zeitschrift, 42: 270. TL: Tarbagatai. Had been originally described as a variety of tyndarus. D: Tarbagatai; South Altai.

·       simulata Lukhtanov, 1987 (Erebia). Zoological Journal, Moscow, 66: 697. TL: Had been originally described as a forma of sibirica. D: Sayan; Praebaikal.

·       tsherskiensis Dubatolov, 1992 (Erebia). Vestnik zoologii, Kiev, 1992 [non tsherakiensis Dubatolov, 1992, loco citato)  (6): 42 – 43; ris. A. TL: “Вост. Якутия, 185 кмСЗУсть-Неры, истокручьяБуркат, правыйистокр. Мюрюле, 1100 – 1200 м” [East Yakutia, 185 km NW Ust-Nera, the source of Burkat, the right source of Myuryule, 1100 – 1200 m]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of  callias. D: Far East.

 

cyclopius Eversmann, 1844 (Hipparchia). Bulletin de la Société des Naturalistes de Moscou, 17: 590.  TL: “in provinzia Irkuzkensi”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       cyclopius Eversmann, 1844 (Hipparchia). D: Sayan; Tuva; Praebaikal; Transbaikal; Amur district; Ussuri district; Altai (without SW); Middle and South Ural; middle tayga of West Siberia.

·       sinopius Huang & Murayama, 1992 (Erebia). Tyô to Ga, Tokyo, 43: 5; fig. 16. TL: “Jiadengyu, Altai, 1400 – 1500 m, grassland in forest zone”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of cyclopius. D: SW Altai.

 

dabanensis Erschoff, 1871 (Erebia). Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, Sankt-Petersburg, 8: 315. TL: “Chamar-Daban”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       chingiza Churkin, 2000 (Erebia). Atalanta, Würzburg, 29: 113 – 114; pl. 8, figs. 7, 8. TL: “Russia, Chita Region, Kodar Mts., near Sul’ban River, 1600 -1900m”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of dabanensis. D: TL.

·       dabanensis Erschoff, 1871 (Erebia). D: Transbaikal.

·       olshvangi P.Gorbunov in Korshunov & Gorbunov, 1995 (Erebia). Dnevnye babochki asiatskoj chasti Rossii, Ekaterinburg: 129. TL: “ПолярныйУрал, ст. КрасныйКамень, г. Сланцевая, 300 – 400 м” [Polar Ural, Krasnyj Kamen, Slanzevaya Mt., 300 – 400 m]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of dabanensis. D: Polar Ural.

·       tundra Staudinger, 1887 (Erebia). Mémoires sur les Lépidoptères, Saint-Pétersbourg, 3: 148; pl. 8, fig. 1. TL: “Kultusch, Gow. Irkutsk” – by the lectotype (Lukhtanov & Lukhtanov, 1994: 112). Had been originally described as a good species. D: Northern part of Siberia.

 

disa Thunberg, 1791 (Papilio). Diss. Ent. sist. Ins. Svec., 2: 37. TL: “Lapponia”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       disa Thunberg, 1791 (Papilio). D: North and Polar tundras of European part and Siberia.

·       festiva Warren, 1931 (Erebia). Entomologist’s Record and Journal of Variation, London, 43: 170. TL: “Yablonoi Mountains”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of disa. D: Altai; Sayan; Tuva; Praebaikal; Transbaikal.

·       strekeri Holland, 1930 (Erebia).  Entomological News, New York, 41: 12. TL: Alaska, Kuskoquim river. Had been originally described as a subspecies of disa. D: Chukotka; ?Kamchatka.

 

discoidalis Kirby in Richardson, 1837 (Hipparchia). The fauna of the borealic America, 4: 298; pl. 3, fig. 2, 3. TL: “Cumberland-House, Lat 54º”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       lena Christoph, 1889 (Erebia). Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, Sankt-Petersburg, 23: 299. TL: “Mittleres Lena-Gebiet”. Had been originally described as a good species. D: Polar tundras of Siberia; Chukotka; Far East (north and middle part).

·       yablonoica Warren, 1931 (Erebia). Entomologist’s Record and Journal of Variation, London, 43: 171. TL: “Yablonoi Mountains”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of discoidalis. D: Amur district, East Sayan, Baikal region, Transbaikalia.

 

edda Ménétriès in Middendorf, 1851 (Erebia). Reise in Sibirien, Zoologie, Saint-Pétersbourg, 2 (1): 58. TL: “Udskoj Ostrog”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       edda Ménétriès in Middendorf, 1851 (Erebia). D: Synja river in the Subpolar Praeural; Malaja Sosva in North Transural; middle and south tayga of Siberia eastwards of Enisej.

 

embla Thunberg, 1791 (Papilio). Diss. ent. sist. Ins. Svecica, 2: 38. TL: Västerbotten, Sweden. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       dissimulata Warren, 1931 (Erebia). Entomologist’s Record and Journal of Variation, London, 43: 169. TL: “Sayan mts.”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of embla. D: Altai; Sayan; Tuva; Praebaikal; Transbaikal.

·       septentrionalis Esaki & Hori, 1937 (Erebia). Insect-Fauna of Saghalien, Tokyo, 1 (Butterflies): 212. TL: Sakhalin (north). Had been originally described as a subspecies of embla. D: North Sakhalin.

·       succulenta Alphéraky, 1897 (Erebia). Mémoires sur les Lépidoptères, Saint-Pétersbourg, 9: 325. TL: “Kamtschatka”. Had been originally described as a variety of embla. D: Far East; Chukotka; Kamchatka.

·       unicolor Spuler, 1908 (Maniola). Die Schmetterlinge Europas, Stuttgart, 1: 38. TL: “in Lappland”. Had been originally described as a variety of embla. D: North of European part (southwards to Nizhny Novgorod region); Polar Ural; north of West Siberia.

 

erynnin Warren, 1932 (Erebia). Entomological Record, London, 44: 166, nom. nov. pro erinna Staudinger, 1894, nec erynis Esper, [1804 – 1805]). TL: “Ost Sajan... Sib. c.m.” – by the lectotype (Lukhtanov & Lukhtanov, 1994: 101). Had been originally described as a good species.

Remark. V. & A. Lukhtanov (1994: 100 – 101) wrote: “Im Sajan-Gebirge und im Baikal-Gebiet kommt die nahe verwandte, wenig bekannte Art E. erynnin Warren, 1932 (Ent. Rec. 44: 166, nom. nov. pro Erebia erina Staudinger, 1894, Dt. Ent. Z. Iris 7: 247, t. 9, f. 2 – sekundдres Homonym von Papilio erynis Esper, [1804 – 1805], Schmett. Abb. Nat. Suppl. 2: 20, Tab. 121, fig. 3; Erebia erinna Staudinger, 1894, Dt. ent. Z. Iris 7: 376 – sekundäres Homonym von Papilio erina Fabricius, 1787, Mantissa Insect. 2: 41; = Erebia sajanensis Korshuniv, 1972, Rev. Ent. URSS 51: 149, syn.nov., nec. Erebia sedakovii sajanensis Warren, 1931, Ent. Rec. 43: 52) vor. Der Lectotypus dieser Art, der von mir in coll. Staudinger im ZMHUB [Zoological Museum of the Humboldt University, Berlin] festgelegt wurde, trдgt folgende Etiketten: 1) “Ost Sajan 92 Sib.c.m.”, 2) “Origin.”, 3) “Erynna”, 4) “Erinna Stgr., Erynnis”, 5) “Lectotypus, ♂, design. V.Lukhtanov.”

D: Sayan; Praebaikal.

 

eugenia Churkin, 2000 (Erebia). Helios, Moscow, 1: 30 – 32; fig. 1. TL: “Int. Tian-Shan, western edge of Kokshaal Range, Sary-Beles Mts., upper stream of Kuldzha-Bashi R., … 3700 – 3800 m”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          eugenia Churkin, 2000 (Erebia). D: TL.

 

euryale Esper, [1805] (Papilio). Die Schmetterlinge in Abbildungen nach der Natur mit Beschreibungen, Erlangen, Suppl. 2: Tab. 118, fig. 2, 3. TL: “Riesengebirge”. Had been originally described as a  good species.

·       euryale Esper, [1805] (Papilio). D: Central European part; Middle Ural.

·       iremelica Korshunov in Korshunov & Gorbunov, 1995 (Erebia). Dnevnye babochki asiatskoj chasti Rossii, Ekaterinburg: 123 [nom. nov. pro uralensis Goltz, 1930, nec uralensis Staudinger, 1871]. TL: Ural. D: Middle Ural.

 

euryaloides Tengström, 1869 (Erebia). Not. Sällsk. Fauna Flora fennica, 10: 295. TL: Finland. Had been originally described as a variety of ligea. Specific rank by: Korshunov & Nikolaev, 2004.

·       arctica Poppins, 1906 (Erebia). Acta of the Society of fauna and flora fennica, 28 (3): 5. TL: “Bugranitza, Kanin peninsula”. Had been originally described as a variety of euryale. D: Kanin Peninsula.

·       euryaloides Tengström, 1869 (Erebia). D: North of European part.

·       flaveoides Korshunov & Tatarinov in Korshunov, 1996 ([Erebia]). Dopolnenija i ispravlenija k knige Dnevnye babochki asiatskoj chasti Rossii, Novosibirsk: 33. TL: “ПриполярныйУрал, ср. теч. р. М. Паток” [Subpolar Ural, middle course of the Malyj Patok river]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of euryale. D: Polar Ural; Subpolar Ural; North Ural.

·       taiga Nikolaev & Korshunov, 2004 (Erebia). Euroasian Entomological Journal, Moscow-Novosibirsk, 3 (1): 51; figs. 25, 26, 50. TL: “Республика Коми, Усть-Вымский р-н, г. Микунь, разнотравный луг, равнинная часть средней тайги” [Komi Republic, Ust-Vymsky district, Mikun Mt., meadow, middle taiga]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of euryaloides. D: Taiga of NE Europa.

·       zhuravskyi Nikolaev & Korshunov, 2004 (Erebia). Euroasian Entomological Journal, Moscow-Novosibirsk, 3 (1): 49 – 51; figs. 17 – 24, 52. TL: “Урал, Косьвинский Камень, верх подгольцового пояса” [Ural, Kosvinsky Stain, upperside of subgoltzy zone]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of euryaloides. D: Middle and South Ural (to 62º N.L.).

 

fasciata Butler, 1868 (Erebia). Catalogue of diurnal Lepidoptera of the family Satyridae of the British Museum, London: 92; pl. 2, fig. 8. TL: “Arctic America”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       avinoffi Holland, 1930 (Erebia). Transacions of the American entomological Society, New York, 56: 151. TL: “Alaska”. Had been originally described as a good species. D: Chukotka; Vrangelya Insel.

·       semo Grum-Grshimailo, 1899 (Erebia). Annales Musei zoologisi, Sankt-Petersburg, 4: 460. TL: “in montibus inter valles flumenum Olenek et Chatanga, et in valle fl. Kolyma”. Had been originally described as a variety of fasciata. D: Tundras of Siberia; Polar Ural; very possible in the polar tundras of northeast European part.

 

fletcheri Elwes, 1899 (Erebia). Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London, 1899: 347; pl. 12, fig. 4. TL: “between the Kurai and Bashkaus”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       chajataensis Dubatolov, 1992 (Erebia). Vestnik zoologii, Kiev, 1992 (6): 43. TL: “Якутия, 180 кмВСВп. Хандыга, верх. р. Хандыга, 232 кмтрассыХандыга – Магадан” [Yakutia, 180 km ENE Khandyga, upper course of Khandyga river, 232  km of the way Khandyga – Magadan]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of fletcheri. D: East Siberian mountains (Suntar Khayata Mts., Tas-Kystabyt Mts., Myuryulyu river, Madaun, Aborigen, Palatka, Karamken).

·       chorymensis Korshunov in Korshunov & Gorbunov, 1995 (Erebia). Dnevnye babochki asiatskoj chasti Rossii, Ekaterinburg: 132. TL: “КузнецкийАлатау, р-нгорыБобровой” [Kuznetsky Alatau Mts., near Mt. Bobrovaja]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of fletcheri. D: TL.

·       fletcheri Elwes, 1899 (Erebia). D: Altai (Kuraisky Mts.); West Sayan (Sajlyg-Khem-Tayga Mts.), East Sayan (Mondy); Transbaikal (Sokkhondo); Ezop Mts.

 

frodo Korb, 2005. sp.n. (Erebia). Here is described as a good species of the genus Erebia. Type material. Holotype male, 4.07.1993, Chita reg., Udokan, leg. Y.Perunov. Deposited in the Zoological Institute, St.Petersburg, Russia. D: Only known from its type locality.

 

graucasica Jachontov, 1909 (Erebia). Revue Russe d’Entomologie, Moscow, 9: 289. TL: “Казбек, Цминда-Самеба” [Kazbek, Zminda-Sameba]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of tyndarus.

·       graucasica Jachontov, 1909 (Erebia). D: Great Caucasus.

·       hippocoon Niesiołowski, 1937 (Erebia). Annales musei zoologoci polonici, Praha, 11: 466; Taf. 54, Fig. 3; Taf. 55, Fig. 1 – 5. TL: “sьdostlichen Hдnge des Elbrus, nahe der Mündung des Adyl-Su in der Baksan-Fluss... 1800 m”. Had been originally described as a good species. D: Transcaucasus.

·       transcaucasica Warren, 1950 (Erebia). The Entomologist, London, 1950: 229. TL: “Borzhom”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of cassioides Reiner & Hocherwarth, 1792. D: Little Caucasus.

 

hewitsoni Lederer, 1864 (Erebia). Wiener entomologische Monatsschrift, 8: 167; Taf. 3, Fig. 6, 7. TL: Abastumani. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       hewitsoni Lederer, 1864 (Erebia). D: Little Caucasus: mountain ridges Murovdagh, Meskhetsky, Trialetsky and Shavshetsky.

 

ilmena Nikolaev in Nikolaev & Korshunov, 2004 (Erebia). Euroasian Entomological Journal, Moscow-Novosibirsk, 3 (1): 52 – 54; figs. 43 – 48, 55, 56 – 59. TL: “Челябинская область, Кусихинский р-н, национальный парк «Зюрат-Куль»” [Chelyabinsk Province, Kusikhinsky district, national park “Zjurat-Kul”]. Had been originally described as a good species.

·ilmena Nikolaev in Nikolaev & Korshunov, 2004 (Erebia). D: Middle and South Ural.

 

iranica Grum-Grshimailo, 1895 (Erebia). Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, Sankt-Petersburg, 29: 291. TL: “Demavend” – by the lectotype (Nekrutenko, 1990: 143). Had been originally described as a variety of tyndarus.

·       dromulus Staudinger, 1901 (Erebia). Catalog der Lepidopteren des palaearktischen Faunengebietes, Dresden (ed. 3): 50. TL: “Ararat” – by the lectotype (Nekrutenko, 1990: 143). Had been originally described as a variety of tyndarus. D: Ararat.

·       iranica Grum-Grshimailo, 1895 (Erebia). D: Elburs.

·       sheljuzhkoi Warren, 1935 (Erebia). Entomological Record, 47: 4. TL: “Teberda”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of callias. D: Great Caucasus.

 

jeniseiensis Trybom, 1877 (Erebia). K. Vetensk. Akad. Forhandl., Stockholm, 1877 (6): 46. TL: Yenisei. Had been originally described as a subspecies of ligea.

·       fasciola Warren, 1931 (Erebia). Entomologist’s Record and Journal of Variation, London, 43: 98. TL: Altai. Had been originally described as a subspecies of jenireiensis. D: South Siberian mountains.

·       jeniseiensis Trybom, 1877 (Erebia). D: middle and south tayga of Siberia.

·       ssp? D: Magadan region.

 

kalmuka Alphéraky, 1881 (Erebia). Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, Sankt-Petersburg, 16: 414; pl. 15, fig. 18, 19. TL: “Jouldousse”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       kalmuka Alphéraky, 1881 (Erebia). D: Inner Tian Shan.

 

kefersteini Eversmann, 1851 (Hipparchia). Bulletin de la Société impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou, 24 (1): 610. TL: “la Sibérie orientale”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       arnica Churkin, 1999 (Erebia). Atalanta, Würzburg, 29: 111, pl. 8, fig. 9. TL: Barguzin Mts., Kedrovoe Lake. Had been originally described as a subspecies of kefersteini. D: Transbaikal (Khamar-Daban Mts.).

·       kefersteini Eversmann, 1851 (Hipparchia). D: Altai; Sayan; Tuva; Praebaikal.

·       kholsunica Lukhtanov, 1990 (Erebia). Vestnik zoologii, Kiev, 1990 (6): 14; ris. 1 (2, 3), 2 (1). TL: “КазахскаяССР, Алтай, 50 кмксеверо-востокуотг. Зыряновска, стыкхребтовХолзуниЛиствяга, 2000 м” [Kazakhstan, Altai, 50 km NE Zyrjanovsk, between the mountain ridges Kholzun and Listvjaga, 2000 m]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of kefersteini. D: West Alati (Kholzun and Listvjaga Mts.).

·       otteni Murzin & Sinyaev, 2003 (Erebia).  Helios, Moscow, 4: 202 – 203; pl. 13, figs. 4 – 6. TL: “Siberia, Kuznetskyi Alatau, Taije Su R., 53º56’N, 89º10’E, h=1650 m”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of kefersteini. D: Kuznetsky Alatau.

·       ssp? D: Yakutia.

 

kindermanni Staudinger, 1881 (Erebia). Stettiner entomologische Zeitschrift, 42: 269. TL: Ulba Mts., West Altai (Lukhtanov, 1990: 16, nota). Had been originally described as a good species.

·       kindermanni Staudinger, 1881 (Erebia). D: North Altai.

·       sarytavica Lukhtanov, 1990 (Erebia). Vestnik zoologii, Kiev, 1990 (6): 15; ris. 1 (5), 2 (2). TL: “КазахскаяССР, ЮжныйАлтай, Курчумскийхр., гораСары-Тау, 2300 м” [Kazakhstan, South Altai, Kurchumsky Mts., Sary-Tau Mt., 2300 m]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of kindermanni. D: South Altai.

 

kozhantshikovi Sheljuzhko, 1925 (Erebia). Entomologische Anzeigen, 5: 9. TL: Dzhalinda river. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       kozhantshikovi Sheljuzhko, 1925 (Erebia). D: North-East Siberia; Lena plateau; East Siberia; Kamchatka; Chukotka; Transbaikal; Bureja Mts.

 

ligea Linnaeus, 1758 (Papilio). Systema Naturae... (ed. 10), 1: 473. TL: Sweden. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       arsenjevi Kurentzov, 1950 (Erebia). Revue d’Entomologie de l’URSS, Léningrad, 31: 243. TL: “Приморскийкрай, Уссурийскийзаповедник” [Ussuri preservation] – by the syntypes (Azarova, 1986: 123). Had been originally described as a subspecies of ligea. D: Ussuri district; Far East; Kamchatka.

·       eumonia Ménériès, 1859 (Erebia). Bull. phys. Acad. St.-Petersb., 3 (1): 105. TL: “Bai Hadschi”. Had been originally described as a good species. D: Mounains of South Siberia.

·       kamensis Krulikowsky, 1909 (Erebia). Revue Russe d’Entomologie, Moscow, 9: 299. TL: “in provinciis Rossiae orientalis Kasan, Viatka, Perm”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of euryale. D: South-East and East European part.

·       ligea Linnaeus, 1758 (Papilio). D: West and Center of European part; North European part; Middle Ural; West Siberia.

·       sachalinensis Matsumura, 1919 (Erebia). Thous Ins. Japan Add., Tokyo, 3: 525. TL: “Saghalien, Motodomari”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of ligea. D: Sakhalin; South Kuril Islands.

 

magdalena Strecker, 1898 (Erebia). Bulletin of the Brooklynian entomological Society, 3: 35. TL: Had been originally described as a good species.

·       chara Churkin, 1999 (Erebia). Atalanta, Würzburg, 29: 107, pl. 8, figs. 1 - 3. TL: North Transbaikal region: “Kodar Mts., near Sul’ban river, 1600 – 1900 m”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of erinnyn. D: TL.

·       sachaensis Dubatolov, 1992 (Erebia). Vestnik zoologii, Kiev, 1992 (6): 41 – 42. TL: “Якутия, 180 кмВСВп. Хандыга, верх. р. В.Хандыга, 248 – 249 кмтрассыХандыга – Магадан, пр. бер. р. Сетарым, ю.-з. склон, 1500 м” [Yakutia, 180 km ENE Khandyga, upper course of E Khandyga river, 248 – 249 km of the way Khandyga – Magadan, the right shore of Setarym, SW slope, 1500 m]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of magdalena. D: TL.

 

maurisius Esper, [1803] (Papilio). Die Schmetterlinge in Abbildungen nach der Natur mit Beschreibungen, Erlangen, Suppl. 1: 106; Tab. 113, fig. 4 – 5. TL: “Ostsajan-Gebirge” (Lukhtanov & Lukhtanov, 1994: 108). Had been originally described as a good species.

·       elwesi Staudinger, 1901 (Erebia). Catalog der Lepidopteren des palaearktischen Faunengebietes, Dresden (ed. 3): 44. TL: “Alt.[ai] or.[ientalis]” Had been originally described as a variety of haberhaueri. D: Altai.

·       maurisius Esper, [1803] (Papilio). D: Sayan; Tuva; Praebaikal.

 

medusa [Denis & Schiffermüller], [1775] (Papilio). Ankundung des systematischen Werkes der Schmetterlinge Wienergegend, Wien: 167. TL: Vienna. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       chatiparae Sheljuzhko, 1937 (Erebia). Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstage von Prof. Dr. Embrik Strand, Riga, 2: 326. TL: “Teberda” – by the lectotype (Nekrutenko, 1990: 140). Had been originally described as a subspecies of medusa. D: Caucasus; Transcaucasus.

·       euphrasia Fruhstorfer, 1917 (Erebia). Archiv Naturgeschichte, A 82: 44. TL: “Bulgarien, Rhila und Rodope... Monte Maggiore, Istrien... Borshom, Kaukasus”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of medusa. D: South of European part; Praecaucasus.

·       medusa [Denis & Schiffermüller], [1775] (Papilio). D: Central European part; North European part; North Ural; West Siberia.

·       transiens Heyne in Rühl, [1895] (Erebia). Die palaearktische Grossschmetterlinge, Augsburg, 1: 810. TL: “Ostsibirien”. Had been originally described as a variety of medusa. D: Amur district.

·       uralensis Staudinger, 1871 (Erebia). Catalog der Lepidopteren des europaeischen Faunengebietes, Berlin (Aufl. 2): 24. TL: “Ural”. Had been originally described as a variety of medusa. D: Middle and South Ural; South Siberian mountains.

Remark. On the same page of Catalog der Lepidopteren des europaeischen Faunengebietes Otto Staudinger esablish the species-group taxon polaris Staudinger, 1871 (p. 24). Taxa uralensis and polaris are synonyms.

 

melancholica Herrich-Schäffer, [1846] (Erebia). Systematische Bearbeitung der Schmetterlinge von Europa, zugleich als Text, Revision und Supplement zu Jakob Hübner’s Sammlung europäischer Schmetterlinge, Regensburg, 6: Tab. 58, Fig. 276 – 279. TL: “[Ararat]” (Nordmann, 1851: 404). Had been originally described as a good species.

·       melancholica Herrich-Schäffer, [1846] (Erebia). D: Great Caucasus; Meskhetsky Mts.; Trialetsky Mts.

 

meta Staudinger, 1886 (Erebia). Stettiner entomologische Zeitschrift, 47: 237. TL: “Aus den Gebirgen bei Osch”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       alexandra Staudinger, 1887 (Erebia). Stettiner entomologische Zeitschrift, 48: 55. TL: “Alexander-Gebirge”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of mopsos. D: North Tian Shan.

·       gertha Staudinger, 1886 (Erebia). Stettiner entomologische Zeitschrift, 47: 238. TL: “Namangan”. Had been originally described as a variety of meta. D: Chatkal Mts.

·       meta Staudinger, 1886 (Erebia). D: Alai; Gissar; Inner Tian Shan.

 

mongolica Erschoff, 1888 (Erebia). Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, Saint-Petersburg, 22: 199, pl. 11, fig. 3. TL: “Чатыръ-Куль” [Chatyr-Kul] – by the lectotype (Churkin, 2002: 23). Had been originally described as a good species.

·       mongolica Erschoff, 1888 (Erebia). D: North and Inner Tian Shan.

 

mopsos Staudinger, 1886 (Erebia). Stettiner entomologische Zeitschrift, 47: 239. TL: “Gebirgen bei Namangan”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       alexandra Staudinger, 1887 (Erebia). Stettiner entomologische Zeitschrift, 48: 55 - 56. TL: “Alexander-Gebirge”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of mopsos. D: North Tian Shan (central and western parts).

·       manuevi Churkin & Zhdanko, 2000 (Erebia). Tethys, Alma-Ata, 2000: ???. TL: “Kasakhstan, N.Tian-Shan, Zailyisky Alatau, 20 km S Almaty, … 2700 – 2900 m”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of meta. D: Central part of Transilian Alatau Mts.

·       melanops Christoph, 1889 (Erebia). Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, Sankt-Petersburg, 23: 299. TL: “Tienschan” (Lukhtanov & Lukhtanov, 1994: 105). Had been originally described as a good species. D: Karaganda region; Dzhungaria; North and Inner Tian-Shan (eastern parts).

·       mopsos Staudinger, 1886 (Erebia). D: Chatkal Mts., eastern edge of Talassky Mts., Suusamyr Mts. (last locality – by the two males which I collected in this place (near Suusamyr village) in 2004).

 

neriene Boeber, 1809 (Papilio). Mémoires de la Société des Naturalistes de Moscou, 2: 307.  TL: “Baikal”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       neriene Boeber, 1809 (Papilio). D: Transbaikal; Amur region; Ussuri region.

·       scoparia Butler, 1881 (Erebia). Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1881: 268. TL: Hokkaido. Had been originally described as a variety of  neriene. D: Sakhalin.

·       sajanensis Warren, 1931 (Erebia). Entomological Record, 43: 147. TL: “Sajan Mts”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of sedakovii Eversmann, 1847. D: Altai; Sayan; Praebaikal.

 

niphonica Janson, 1877 (Erebia). Cistula Entomologica, 2:  153. TL: Japan, “Assamayama, at an elevation of about 7000 feet”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       doii Nakahara, 1926 (Erebia). Insecutor Inscit. Menstr., Washington, 14: 50. TL: “Kunashiri Island”. Had been originally described as a  subspecies of sedakovii. D: South Kuril Islands.

·       scoparia Butler, 1881 (Erebia). Proceedings of the zoological Society of London, 1881: 849. TL: Japan, “Shiribetsu, Kuramatsunai”. Had been originally described as a good species. D: the lower Amur river basin, Sakhalin Island.

 

occulta Roos & Kimmich, 1983 (Erebia). Entomologische Zeitschrift, Frankfurt am Main, 93: 69 – 76. TL: Seward peninsula. Had been originally described as a good species.

Remark. A.G.Belik  (1996: 162) wrote: “The use of the name Erebia anyuica Kurentsov, 1966 constitutes a big problem. In fact it is still unclear which insect Kurentsov described under this name. Judging from the original description it superficially looks like a butterfly belonging to the E. magdalena species complex (large butterflies with a wingspan of 50 mm, completely blackish-brown without any trace of wing pattern on both upper- and underside – cf. Kurentsov, 1970: 57), while the structure of the male genitalia, figured in the original description, clearly shows that the species belongs to the E. dabanensis species group (cf. Kurentsov, 1970: 57, fig. 53, 2, 3). The Nearctic species E. occulta Roos & Kimmich, 1983 (= E. phellea Philip & Troubridge, 1983) has the same structure of male genitalia. This fact led Dubatolov (1992: 44) to accept E. occulta conspecific with E. anyuica.”

·       iltshira Belik, 1996 (Erebia). Phegea, Antwerpen, 24: 157 – 163; fig. 1; pl. 1, figs. 1 – 8. TL: “Russia, Vostochnyy Sayan mountains, khrebet (mountain ridge) Kitoiskiye Gol’tsy, river Kitoi upper stream, vicinity of the lake Il’chir, 2250 m”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of anyuica. D: West Sayan; East Sayan; Praebaikal (Baikalsky mountain ridge).

·       jakuta Dubatolov, 1992 (Erebia). Vestnik zoologii, Kiev, 1992 (6): 44. TL: “Якутия, 180 кмВСВп. Хандыга, 232 кмтрассыХандыга – Магадан, гребеньгоры” [Yakutia, 180 km ENE Khandyga, 232 km of the way Khandyga – Magadan, a mountain peak]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of anyuica. D: Suntar-Khayata Mts.

·       sokhondinka Dubatolov & Zintshenko in Korshunov & Gorbunov, 1995 (Erebia). Dnevnye babochki asiatskoj chasti Rossii, Ekaterinburg: 128. TL: “Читинскаяобл., Сохондинскийзаповедник, ВерхнийБукукун” [Chita reg., Sokhondinsky preservation, Verkhny Bukukun]. Had been originally described as a susbspecies of occulta. D: Transbaikal.

 

ocnus Eversmann, 1843 (Hipparchia). Bulletin de la Société impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou, 16: 538; pl. 8, fig. 5. TL: “Noor-Saisan gegend”  - by the lectotype designation (Churkin, 2002 a: 8). Had been originally described as a good species.

·       ocnus Eversmann, 1843 (Hipparchia). D: Dzhungaria.

·       regeli Churkin, 2002 (Erebia). Helios, Moscow, 3: 14 – 15;  fig. 2 d, pls. 1, 2, figs. 10 – 12, 18. TL: “Turkestan”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of ocnus. D: SW Dzhungaria.

·       tianchanica Lang, 1884 (Erebia). Rhopalocera Europae descripta et delineata. The butterflies of Europe described and figured, London, 1: 320. TL: “Kuldja”. Had been originally described as a good species. D: North Tian Shan.

 

ola Korshunov in Korshunov & Gorbunov, 1995 (Erebia). Dnevnye babochki asiatskoj chasti Rossii, Ekaterinburg: 127. TL: “Магаданская обл., верховья р. Ола, окр. горы Нух (1828 м)” [Magadan reg., upper course of Ola river, Nukh Mt. vicinity]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of mackinleyensis.

·       ola Korshunov in Korshunov & Gorbunov, 1995 (Erebia). D: TL.

 

pandrose Borkhausen, 1788 (Papilio). Naturgeschichte der europäischen Schmetterlinge nach systematischer Ordnung: Tagschmetterlinge, Frankfurt, 1: 95. TL: “Steyermark”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       pandrose Borkhausen, 1788 (Papilio). D: Kola peninsula; Polar Ural.

·       yernikensis Korshunov in Korshunov & Gorbunov, 1995 (Erebia). Dnevnye babochki asiatskoj chasti Rossii, Ekaterinburg: 133 [nom. nov. pro orientalis Goltz, 1930, nec epiphron orientalis Elwes, 1900]. TL: Altai. Had been originally described as a subspecies of pandrose. D: Altai; Sayan; Praebaikal; Tuva; Transbaikal.

 

pawlowskii Ménétriès in Schrenck, 1859 (Erebia). Reisen und Forschungen im Amur-Lande, Sankt-Petersburg, 2 (1): 75. TL: “riviere Grande Sibagli”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       pawlowskii Ménétriès in Schrenck, 1859 (Erebia). D: Yakutia; Magadan reg.; Stanovoe Nagorje.

·       sajana Staudinger, 1894 (Erebia). Deutsche entomologische Zeitschrift Iris, 7: 244. TL: Sayan, “Munku Sardyk-Gebirge”. Had been originally described as a variety of pawlowskii. D: East Sayan; Praebaikal; North Transbaikal.

 

polonina Nikolaev in Nikolaev & Korshunov, 2004 (Erebia). Euroasian Entomological Journal, Moscow-Novosibirsk, 3 (1): 54 – 56; figs. 34 – 42, 54, 60 – 63. TL: “Украинские Карпаты, хр. Свидовец, полонина Драгобрат, 1300 м” [Ukrainian Carpathians, Svidovetz Mts., polonina Dragobrat, 1300 m]. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       polonina Nikolaev in Nikolaev & Korshunov, 2004 (Erebia). D: Svidovetz Mts in Ukrainian Carpathians.

 

progne Grum-Grshimaïlo, 1890 (Erebia). Mémoires sur les Lépidoptères, Saint-Pétersbourg, 4: 454. TL: “du col Kaouk”. Had been originally described as a  variety of radians.

·       progne Grum-Grshimaïlo, 1890 (Erebia). D: Alai mountain ridge.

·       samodurovi Tschikolowez, 1992 (Erebia). Atalanta, Würzburg, 23: 181; Textabb.; Taf. 10, Fig. 4 – 7. TL: “Kirgisien, Transalaj-Gebirgskette, Nord-Seite Kisil-Art-Paβ, 4000 m”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of progne. D: Transalai mountain ridge.

 

radians Lang, 1884 (Erebia). Rhopalocera Europae descripta et delineata. The butterflies of Europa described and figured, London, 1: 320. TL: “Kuldja”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       radians Lang, 1884 (Erebia). D: North Tian Shan; Alai.

·       uzyngyrus Churkin & Tuzov, 2000 (Erebia). Helios, Moscow, 1: 9 – 10;  figs. 1 a, 2 a, b, 4 a, 6 c, 7 d, i.TL: “Tian-Shan, Kirgizsky Range, Uzungyr Mts., Chon-Kurchak R., 2700 m”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of radians. D: Central and Eastern part of Kirghiz Mts.

·       zhdankoi Churkin & Tuzov, 2000 (Erebia). Helios, Moscow, 1: 8 – 9; figs. 1 c, 2 e – f, 5 c, 6 b, 7 a, e, f. TL: “Inn. Tian-Shan, SW edge of At-Bashi Mountains, near Chatyr-Kel L., Karasu R., 3700 - 3900 m”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of radians. D: Inner Tian Shan.

 

rossi Curtis in Ross, 1834 (Hipparchia). Narrative 2nd voyage. N.W.Passage, 1829 – 1833, Appendix: LXVIII. TL: “Boothia Peninsula” in North America. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       erda Sheljuzhko, 1924 (Erebia). Entomologische Anzeigen, 4: 165. TL: “Munko-Sardyk”. Had been originally described as a good species. D: Altai.

Remark. “ob E. rossi f. erda und E. ero zwei gute Arten sind, die                                                                          zusammen in Südsibirien fliegen, oder ob es sich nur im infraspezifische Formen einer Art handelt” (Lukhtanov & Lukhtanov, 1994: 98).

·       ero Bremer, 1861 (Erebia). Bulletin de la Academie impériale des Sciences, Saint-Pétersbourg, Ser. 3, 3: 548. TL: “Apfelgebirge”. Had been originally described as a good species. D: Sayan; Praebaikal; Tuva; Transbaikal.

·       subarctica Korshunov, 1996 (Erebia). Dopolnenija k knige Dnevnye babochki asiatskoj chasti Rossii, Novosibirsk: 33 – 34. TL: “лев. берег р. Танловой – притока р. Щучьей (Ю. Ямал)”.  [left shore of the Tanlovaya river in South Yamal]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of rossi. D: Northern part of Siberia; Chukotka.

 

sibo Alphéraky, 1881 (Erebia). Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, Sankt-Petersburg, 16: 416; pl. 15, fig. 20, 21. TL: “Tian Chian/Arschan/11.000 [feet]” – by the lectotype (Churkin, 2002 a: 16). Had been originally described as a good species.

·       sibo Alphéraky, 1881 (Erebia). D: Inner Tian Shan; ?Dzhungaria.

 

sokolovi Lukhtanov, 1990 (Erebia). Vestnik zoologii, Kiev, 1990 (6): 13; ris. 1 (1). TL: “Казахская ССР, Джамбульская обл., 30 км к югу от пос. Мерке, Киргизский хр., верховья р. Каракыстак, 3100 м” [Kazakhstan, Dzhambul reg., 30 km S Merke, Kirghiz Mts., upper course of Karakystak river, 3100 m]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of radians.

·       arcana Churkin & Tuzov, 2000 (Erebia). Helios, Moscow, 1: 14 – 15; figs. 1 e, 3 g, h, 5 h, 6 g, 8 b, k. TL: “Tian-Shan, Dzhetim-Bel Mts., Ekurgen-Kel L., 3700 – 4000 m”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of sokolovi. D: West Tian Shan.

·       colorata Churkin & Tuzov, 2000 (Erebia). Helios, Moscow, 1: 13 – 14; figs. 1 d, 3 c, d, 5 f, 6 f, 8 c, i. TL: “Int. Tian-Shan, Moldo-Too Mts., 10 km S from Song-Kel L., Moldoo Pass”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of sokolovi. D: Inner Tian Shan.

·       severa Churkin & Tuzov, 2000 (Erebia). Helios, Moscow, 1: 12 - 13; figs. 1 d, 3 e, 5 g, 6 h. TL: “Int. Tian-Shan, West edge of Kokshaal Range, Sary-Beles Mts., upper stream of Kuldzha-Bashi R., … 3700 – 3800 m”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of sokolovi. D: Inner Tian Shan: Kokshaaltau mts.

·       sokolovi Lukhtanov, 1990 (Erebia). D: Western part of Kirghiz Mts.

 

 

stubbendorfii Ménétriès, 1846 (Erebia). Bulletin de la physique et mathematique Academie impériale des Sciences, Saint-Pétersbourg, Ser. 2, 5: 264. TL: “Kansk” – by the lectotype (Lukhtanov & Lukhtanov, 1994: 110). Had been originally described as a good species.

Remark. The status restarated by V. & A. Lukhtanov (1994: 110).

·       stubbendorfii Ménétriès, 1846 (Erebia). D: Altai; West Sayan (Pazaryk-Ergak-Tayga Mts.); Tuva.

 

theano Tauscher, 1806 (Papilio). Mémoires de la Société des Naturalistes de Moscou, 2: 207. TL: “in Montibus Altaicis Sibiriae”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       approximata Warren, 1930 (Erebia). Entomologist’s Record and Journal of Variation, London, 42: 56. TL: West Altai, “Korgon Mts”. Had been originally described as a race of subspecies theano of pawlowskii  [E. t. approximata Warren, 1936 (Monograph of  the genus Erebia, London: 237) – new status]. D: Korgon Mts.

·       shoria Korshunov & Ivonin in Korshunov & Gorbunov, 1995 (Erebia). Dnevnye babochki asiatskoj chasti Rossii, Ekaterinburg: 130. TL: “долинар. Тузухсувверховьяхр. Томи” [Tuzukhsu valley in the upper course of Tom’ river]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of theano. D: Kusnezky Alatau Mts. in Siberia.

·       theano Tauscher, 1806 (Papilio). D: Altai; Sayan; Tuva; Praebaikal.

·       tshugunovi Korshunov & Ivonin in Korshunov & Gorbunov, 1995 (Erebia). Dnevnye babochki asiatskoj chasti Rossii, Ekaterinburg: 130. TL: “Новосибирскаяобл., с. Китерня, долинар. Китерня” [Novosibirsk region, Kiternja, Kiternja river valley]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of theano. D: Salairsky Kryazh in Novosibirsk region.

 

troubridgei Dubatolov, 1992 (Erebia). Vestnik zoologii, Kiev, 1992 (6): 43 – 44. TL: “Якутия, 180 км ВСВ п. Хандыга, верх. р. В. Хандыга, 232 км трассы Хандыга – Магадан” [Yakutia, 180 km ENE Khandyga, upper course of E. Khandyga river, 232 km of the way Khandyga – Magadan]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of dabanensis.

Remark. The specific status by V.K.Tuzov (1995: 107).

·       troubridgei Dubatolov, 1992 (Erebia). D: West Chukotka; Magadan region; East and Central Yakutia.

 

turanica Erschoff, 1877 (Erebia). Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, Sankt-Petersburg, 12: 336. TL: “auf den Alpen von Turkestan”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       grumi V.Lukhtanov in Lukhtanov & Lukhtanov, 1994 (Erebia). Herbipoliana, Marktleuthen, 3: 104 [nom. nov. pro Erebia turanica var. tristis Grum-Grshimailo, 1893, nec E. tristis Herrich-Schäffer, 1848 et E. tristis Bremer, 1861]. TL: “In Turkestania occidentali”. Had been originally described as a variety of turanica. D: West Tian Shan.

·       jucunda Püngeler, 1903 (Erebia). Deutsche entomologische Zeitschrift Iris, 16: 286. TL: “Gebirge nördlich von Korla”. Had been originally described as a variety of turanica. D: Terskey Ala-Too Mts.

·       laeta Staudinger, 1881 (Erebia). Stettiner entomologische Zeitschrift, 42: 205. TL: “Tianschan”. Had been originally described as a variety of turanica. D: North Tian Shan.

·       susamyr Lukhtanov, 1999 (Erebia). Atalanta, Würzburg, 30 (1/4): 139. TL: “Kirgisien, Suusamyr-Gebirge, Kysyloi Gegend, Kobyk, 2100 m.” Had been originally described as a subspecies of turanica. D: Suusamyrtoo mountain ridge.

·       turanica Erschoff, 1877 (Erebia). D: Inner Tian Shan.

·       ssp? D: SW Altai (Zyryanovsk vicinity).

 

usgentensis Heyne in Rühl, 1894 (Erebia). Die palaearktischen Grossschmetterlinge und ihre Naturgeschichte. Tagfalter, Leipzig, 1: 502. TL: “Usgent” (by the lectotype (Churkin & Tuzov, 2000a: 8). Had been originally described as a variety of radians.

·       usgentensis Heyne in Rühl, 1894 (Erebia). D: Usgent vicinity in Alai Mts.

·       ssp? D: Kirghiz Mts. near Bishkek (Chon-Kuurchak valley).

 

wanga Bremer, 1864 (Erebia). Mémoires de la Academie des Sciences, Saint-Pétersbourg, 8: 20. TL: “Bureja-Gebirge”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       wanga Bremer, 1864 (Erebia). D: Ussuri district; South Amur district.

 

 

youngi Holland, 1900 (Erebia). Entomological News, 11: 388. TL: North-East Aliaska, between Forty-Mile and Mission Greeks. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       tschuktscha Herz, 1903 (Erebia). Ezhegodnik imperatorskogo zoologicheskogo muzeja, Sankt-Petersburg, 3: 16. TL: “Tschuktsch. Halbinsel. Б. Провидения” [Chukotka, Provideniya Bay] – by the holotype (Dubatolov, 2002: 143). Had been originally described as a variety of dabanensis. D: Chukotka.

 

Lepidoptera Indica, London, 2 (16): 103. TS: Erebia kalinda Moore, 1865.

 

alajense Korb, 2004 (Paralasa). Alexanor, Paris, 23 (2): 116; Abb. 2. TL: “Weiler von Alajku, Alaj-Gebirge”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·            alajense Korb, 2004 (Paralasa). D: TL.

 

ali Churkin & Tuzov, 1998 (Paralasa). Neue entomologische Nachrichten, Berlin, 41: 188; pl. 1, fig. 4. TL: “Alai, Kollektorsky Mts., Dugoba R., 2,700 m”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          ali Churkin & Tuzov, 2000 (Paralasa). D: Alai.

 

bogutena Lukhtanov & Lukhtanov, 1994 (Paralasa). Atalanta, Würzburg, 25: 167 – 168; Taf. 5 b. TL: “Kasachstan, Alma-Ata-Gebiet, Boguty-Gebirge, 1300 m”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of jordana.

·       bogutena Lukhtanov & Lukhtanov, 1994. D: Boguty Mts.; Kirghiz Mts.

 

chitralica Evans, 1923 (Erebia). Journal of the Bombay natural History Society, 29 (3): 783; pl. 13, fig. D13.2. TL: “Chitral”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of kalinda.

·       chitralica Evans, 1923 (Erebia). D: Severo-Alichursky, Yuzhno-Alichursky and Vakhansky Mts.

 

hades Staudinger, 1890 (Erebia). Berliner entomologische Zeitschrift, 26: 172. TL: “auf dem Alai-Gebirge”.

·       erebus Grum-Grshimaïlo, 1890 (Erebia). Mémoires sur les Lépidoptères, Saint-Pétersbourg, 4: 448 - 449. TL: “Kisil Art”. Had been originally described as a  good species. D: Transalai Mts, Kyzyl Art Pass.

·       hades Staudinger, 1890 (Erebia). D: Gissar; Alai.

·       yaktshashma Churkin & Tuzov, 1998 (Paralasa). A guide of butterflies from Russia and adjacent territories, Sofia, 1: 124; pl. 53, figs. 4 – 6. TL: Yaktshashma valley. Had been originally described as a  subspecies of hades. D: Darvaz.

 

horaki Tuzov, 1998 (Paralasa). A guide to butterflies of Russia and adjacent territories, Sofia, 1: 125; pl. 53; figs. 13, 14. TL: Taldyk, Alai. Had been originally described as a  good species.

·horaki Tuzov, 1998 (Paralasa). D: Alai Mts.

 

ida Grum-Grshimaïlo, 1890 (Erebia). Mémoires sur les Lépidoptères, Saint-Pétersbourg, 4: 451 - 452. TL: “Montagnes Khodja-Djaïlaou – au pied du col Kisil-Tokay du côté occidental”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       ida Grum-Grshimaïlo, 1890 (Erebia). D: Southern parts of Zulumart range, western part of Muzkol Mts and northern slopes of western part of Severo-Alichursky Mts..

 

ishkashima Ju.L. & Ju.Ju.Stshetkin, 1991 (Erebia). Doklady Akademii Nauk Tadzhikskoj SSR, Dushanbe, 34 (1): 64. TL: “Шугнанский хребет: ущелье Сангоудара, 3500 м” [Shugnan Mts., Sangoudara valley, 3500 m]. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       ishkashima Ju.L. & Ju.Ju.Stshetkin, 1991 (Erebia). D: Pamir: Shugnansky, Shakhdarinsky, Ishkashimsky, Yuzhno-Alichursky and Severo-Alichursky mountain ridges.

 

jordana Staudinger in Staudinger & Bang-Haas, 1882 (Erebia). Berliner entomologische Zeitschrift, 27: 171. TL: “auf dem Alai-Gebirge, in der Nähe des Dorfes Jordan,... auf dem Hazret-Sultan Gebirge”.  Had been originally described as a good species.

·       helios O.Bang-Haas, 1927 (Erebia). Horae Macrolepidopterologicae regionis palaearcticae, Drezden, 1: 143. TL: Naryn. Had been originally described as a variety of jordana. D: Inner Tian Shan.

·       jordana Staudinger in Staudinger & Bang-Haas, 1882 (Erebia). D: Alai.

·       roxana Grum-Grshimailo, 1887 (Erebia).  Mémoires sur les Lépidoptères, Saint-Pétersbourg, 3: 75. TL: Transalai, Kisil Art. Had been originally described as a good species. D: Transalai Mts.; Darvaz.

·       seravschana Lukhtanov, 1999 (Paralasa). Atalanta, Würzburg, 30 (1/4): 141 – 142. TL: “Tadschikistan, Aini-Bezirk (60 km E Aini), Seravschan-Gebirge, Dascht, 2100 – 2600 m.” Had been originally described as a subspecies of jordana. D: eastern part of Zeravshan Mts.

·       shachristana Ju.L. & Ju.Ju.Stshetkin, 1991 (Erebia). Doklady Akademii Nauk Tadzhikskoj SSR, Dushanbe, 34 (1): 65. TL: “Зеравшанскийхр: близкишлакаВору” [Zeravshansky Mts. near Voru Kishlak]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of jordana. D: Gissar.

 

kotzschae Goltz, 1937 (Erebia). Entomologische Rundschau, 54: 357 – 364. TL: Hindukush. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       kotzshae Goltz, 1937 (Erebia). D: Ishkashimsky Mts.

·       shugnana Stshetkin, 1971 (Erebia). Izvestija Akademii Nauk Tadzhikskoj SSR, Otdel biologicheskikh nauk, Dushanbe, 1971 (4): 67 – 72. TL: Shugnan Mts. Had been originally described as a good species. D: Western part of Shugnansky Mts.

 

kusnezovi Avinov, 1910 (Erebia). Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, Sankt-Petersburg, 39 (5): 249; Tab. 14, fig. 11. TL: “In Ferghana septentrionali lecta” [Padhsa-Ata in Chatkal Mts.]. Had been originally described as a variety of manni.

·       issykkuli Lukhtanov, 1999 (Paralasa). Atalanta, Würzburg, 30 (1/4): 140 – 141. TL: “Kirgisien, Issyk-Kul-Gebiet, Kungey-Alatoo, Turaigyr, 2250 m.” Had been originally described as a subspecies of kusnezovi. D: southern slopes of Kungey Ala-Too Mts. and northern slopes of Terskey Ala-Too Mts.

·       kolesnichenkoi Churkin & Zhdanko, 2001 (Paralasa). Helios, Moscow, 2: 195 – 197; fig. 1; pl. 16, figs. 13 – 15.  TL: “Suusamyr Mts., Kokemeren R., Kyzyl-Oi vic., 2200 – 2500 m”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of kuznezovi [sic!]. D: Suusamyr Valley.

·       kusnezovi Avinov, 1910 (Erebia). D: West Tian Shan without Talassky Mts.; western part of Kirghiz Mts.

·       talastauana Lukhtanov, 1999 (Paralasa). Atalanta, Würzburg, 30 (1/4): 140. TL: “Gouv. Syr-Darja, Aulie-Ata, Alatau mont. Occ., 2500 m.” Had been originally described as a subspecies of kusnezovi. D: Talassky Mts.

 

 

 

langara Stshetkin, 1971 (Erebia). Doklady Akademii Nauk Tadzhikskoj SSR, Dushanbe, 14 (3): 78 – 79. TL: “Langar”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of semenovi.

·       langara Stshetkin, 1971 (Erebia). D: Northern slope of Vanchsky Mts.

 

maracandica Erschoff in Fedtschenko, 1874 (Erebia). Reise nach Turkestan, 2 (5) 3: 17; tab. 1, Fig. 13. TL: “Maracandia in monde Tschupanata”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       maracandica Erschoff in Fedtschenko, 1874 (Paralasa). D: Gissar; Darvaz; Alai.

 

nero Staudinger, 1894 (Erebia). Deutsche entomologische Zeitschrift, 7: 351. TL: “Fergana mer. (? Transalai)”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       nero Staudinger, 1894 (Erebia). D: Transalai Mts.; West Pamir.

 

pamira Ju.Ju.Stshetkin, 1986 (Erebia). Bulleten Moskovskogo obstshestva ispytatelej prirody, Otdelenie biologicheskikh nauk, Moscow, 91 (3): 66 – 67; ris. 1, 2. TL: “северный склон Шахдаринского хребта в районе пика К. Маркса, 4300 – 4350 м, скалы” [the northern slope of the Shakhdarinsky mountain ridge near K. Marx peak, 4300 – 4350 m, rocks]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of  manioides Wyatt & Omoto, 1966.

·          pamira Ju.Ju.Stshetkin, 1986 (Erebia). D: South Pamir – Shugnansky, Shakhdarinsky, Yuzhno-Alichursky, Severo-Alichursky.

 

semenovi Avinov, 1910 (Erebia). Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, Sankt-Petersburg, 39 (5): 249; Tab. 14, fig. 8 et 9. TL: “In montibus Alajensibus lecta”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       semenovi Avinov, 1910 (Erebia). D: Northern slope of the Alai mountain ridge.

 

shakti Wyatt, 1961 (Paralasa). The Journal of the Lepidopterological Society, 15 (1): 13. TL: “Bala Quran, Anjuman Valley, Hindu Kush, 14,000 ft.” Had been originally described as a good species.

·       ssp? D: West Pamir: Rushansky Mts.

 

summa Avinov, 1910 (Erebia). Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, Sankt-Petersburg, 39 (5): 236; Tab. 14, fig. 10. TL: [East Pamir]. Had been originally described as a variety of manni.

·       summa Avinov, 1910 (Erebia). D: Eastern parts of the Severo-Alichursky and Yuzhno-Alichursky mountain ridges; Vakhansky Mts.

 

unica Korb, 1997 (Paralasa). Zoological Journal, Moscow, 76: 1050 [nom. nov. pro Erebia fasciata Staudinger, 1887, nec E. fasciata Butler, 1868]. TL: “Transalai”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       unica Korb, 1997 (Paralasa). D: Alai and Transalai Mts.

 

 

Subfamily Satyrinae Boisduval, [1833]

Tribus Maniolini Grote, 1897

 

Fauna Boica, 2: 167. TS: Papilio jurtina Linnaeus, 1758.

 

jurtina Linnaeus, 1758 (Papilio). Systema Naturae... (ed. 10), 1: 415. TL:  Sweden. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       jurtina Linnaeus, 1758 (Papilio). D: Central European part; West Siberia; Altai; North Tian Shan.

·       strandiana Obratzov, 1936 (Maniola). Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstage  von Prof. Dr. Embrik Strand, Riga, 1: 683. TL: Fundukleevka, Kirovograd region in Transcaucasus. Had been originally described as a subspecies of jurtina. D: South of European part; Caucasus; Transcaucasus; Kopet Dagh.

 

Entomological Record, London, 27: 156. TS: Papilio lycaon Rottemburg, 1775.

 

amardaea Lederer, 1869 (Epynephele). Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, Sankt-Petersburg, 6: 84; Tab.5, fig. 1, 2. TL: “Hadschyabad” – by the lectotype (Lukhtanov & Lukhtanov, 1994: 129). Had been originally described as a good species.

·       amardaea Lederer, 1869 (Epynephele). D: Kopet Dagh.

·       perplexa Wyatt & Omoto, 1966 (Hyponephele). Entomops, Nice, 6: 182 – 183; figs. TL: “Bala Quran, Anjuman V., Hindu-Kush, 3,300 – 3,400 m”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of amardaea. D: West Pamir.

 

cadusia Lederer, 1869 (Epinephele). Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, Sankt-Petersburg, 6: 84; Taf. 4, Fig. 10, 11. TL: “Hadschyabad”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       cadusia Lederer, 1869 (Epinephele). D: Kopet Dagh.

 

cadusina Staudinger, 1881 (Epinephele). Stettiner entomologische Zeitschrift, 42: 299. TL: “Lepsa-Gebiet” – by the lectotype (Lukhtanov & Lukhtanov, 1994: 122). Had been originally described as a good species.

·       cadusina Staudinger, 1881 (Epinephele). D: South Ural; SE Kazakhstan; Dzhungarian Alatau Mts.; Saur; Tarbagatai.

·       gurkini Korshunov in Korshunov & Gorbunov, 1995 (Hyponephele). Dnevnye babochki asiatskoj chasti Rossii, Ekaterinburg: 121. TL: “Ц.Алтай, ...склонр. Катуниблизеёслиянияср. Чуей” [Central Altai, ...the ufer of Katun’ river near Chuya river]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of cadusina. D: Central and South West Altai.

·       monotoma Staudinger, 1886 (Epynephele). Stettiner entomologische Zeitschrift, 47: 251. TL: “Prov. Samark.” – by the lectotype (Lukhtanov & Lukhtanov, 1994: 123). Had been originally described as a variety of cadusina. D: Alai; Tian Shan.

 

capella Christoph, 1877 (Epinephele). Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, Sankt-Petersburg, 12: 245; Tab. 5, fig. 15; Tab. 6, fig. 16. TL: North Iran, Shahkuh Mts. (“…Kalkgebirge…”), Hadzhyabad. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       capella Christoph, 1877 (Epinephele). D: Kopet Dagh.

·       shivacola Wyatt, 1961 (Hyponephele). The Journal of the Lepidopterological Society, 15 (1): 174; pl. 2, fig. 52, pl. 3, fig. 53. TL: “Shiva Mts, 9,000 ft”. Had been originally described as a good species. D: Gissar; Pamir.

 

catalampra Staudinger, 1895 (Epinephele). Deutsche entomologische Zeitschrift Iris, 8: 347. TL: “Uliassutai” – by the lectotype (Lukhtanov & Lukhtanov, 1994: 119). Had been originally described as a variety of lycaon.

·       catalampra Staudinger, 1895 (Epinephele). D: Tuva; South Transbaikal.

 

catamelas Staudinger, 1886 (Epinephele). Stettiner entomologische Zeitschrift, 47: 251. TL: “Altai, Omifluss” – by the lectotype (Lukhtanov & Lukhtanov, 1994: 119). Had been originally described as a variety of lycaon.

·       catamelas Staudinger, 1886 (Epinephele). D: Transbaikal; Praebaikal; Tuva; Sayan; Altai (without SW).

·       rufodiffusus Korb, 2000 (Hyponephele). Alexanor, Paris, 21 (1): 52; figs. 2, 3, 7, 8, 13, 14. TL: “Monts Altaï, Změïnogorsk”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of Hyponephele catamelas. D: SW Altai.

 

comara Lederer, 1870 (Epinephele). Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, Sankt-Petersburg, 8: 12; Taf. 1, Fig. 9, 10. TL: “Hadschyabad” – by the lectotype (Nekrutenko, 1990: 154). Had been originally described as a good species.

·       comara Lederer, 1870 (Epinephele). D: Ordubad vicinity in Transcaucasus.

 

dzhungarica Samodurov, 1996 (Hyponephele). Nachrichten des entomologischen Vereins Apollo, N.F., Frankfurt am Main, 17: 26 – 28; Abbn. 10, 16, 24 (N 240710, 240808). TL: “SO-Kasachstan, Taldy-Kurganer Gebiet, Dsungarski-Alatau, loc. Kapal, 1300 m”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       dzhungarica Samodurov, 1996 (Hyponephele). D: Dzhungaria (only Dzhungarian Alatau ?).

 

davendra Moore, 1865 (Epinephele). Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London: 502; pl. 30, fig. 7 – 8. TL: Cashmir. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          seravshana Lukhtanov, 1997 (Hyponephele). D: Gissar; Darvaz; Pamir; Alai.

 

dysdora Lederer, 1870 (Epinephele). Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, Sankt-Petersburg, 6: 85; Taf. 5, Fign. 1, 2. TL: “Hadschyabad” – by the lectotype (Lukhtanov & Lukhtanov, 1994: 127). Had been originally described as a good species.

·       dysdora Lederer, 1870 (Epinephele). D: Kopet Dagh; South and South East Kazakhstan; North Uzbekistan; Tian Shan; Alai.

·       dysdorina Heyne in Rühl, [1894] (Epinephele). Die palaearktische Grossschmetterlinge und ihre Naturgeschichte. Tagfalter, Leipzig, 1: 598. TL: “Tura”. Had been originally described as a variety of dysdora. D: South-East Turkmenia; Central and South Usbekistan; Gissar; Darvaz; West Pamir.

 

evanescens Wyatt & Omoto, 1966 (Hyponephele). Entomops, Nice, 6: 181; figs. TL: “Bala Quran, Anjuman V., Hindu-Kush, 2,900 m”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of davendra.

·       evanescens Wyatt & Omoto, 1966 (Hyponephele). D: West Pamir: mountain ridges Vanchsky, Yazgulemsky, Ishkashimsky and, possible, Shugnansky and both Alichursky.

 

fortambeka Samodurov, 1996 (Hyponephele). Nachrichten des entomologischen Vereins Apollo, N.F., Frankfurt am Main, 17: 24 – 25; Abbn. 2, 14, 24 (N 279308). TL: “[Tadschikistan], Zentr.-Pamir, [Peter-I.-Gebirgskette], Fortambek-Gletscher, 4000 m”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       fortambeka Samodurov, 1996 (Hyponephele). D: TL.

 

fusca Stshetkin, 1960 (Epinephele). Trudy instituta zoologii i parazitologii Akademii Nauk Tadzhikskoj SSR, Dushanbe, 19: 99 – 100. TL: “Песчаный перевал, пески у горы Буритау” [Pescheny pass, sands near Buritau Mt.]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of narica.

·       fusca Stshetkin, 1960 (Epinephele). D: South Gissar; Kopet Dagh.

 

germana Staudinger, 1887 (Epinephele). Stettiner entomologische Zeitschrift, 48: 62. TL: “Alex. Geb.” – by the lectotype (Lukhtanov & Lukhtanov, 1994: 125). Had been originally described as a variety of haberhaueri.

·       germana Staudinger, 1887 (Epinephele). D: Tian Shan: mountain ridges Kirghiz, Kungey Ala-Too, Transili Alatau; possible in Ketmen Mts. and Terskey Ala-Too Mts.

 

glasunovi Grum-Grshimailo, 1893 (Epynephele). Horae Societatis  Entomologicae Rossicae, Sankt-Petersburg, 27: 129. TL: “Hissar Mt.”, “Iskander-Darja” – by the lectotype (Lukhtanov & Lukhtanov, 1994: 129). Had been originally described as a variety of amardea.

·       glasunovi Grum-Grshimailo, 1893 (Epynephele). D: Gissar; Darvaz; Alai; North Tian Shan; Kirghiz Mts. (eastern part); Inner Tian Shan; South Tian Shan.

·       magna Samodurov, 1996 (Hyponephele). Nachrichten des entomologischen Vereins Apollo., N.F., Frankfurt am Main, 17: 35, 40; Abbn. 12, 23, 24 (N 315209). TL: “Kasachstan, Dschambuler Gebiet, Kirgisische Gebirgskette, Schlucht des Karakystak-Fluβes, 30 km südl. loc. Merke”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of glasunovi. D: Kirghiz Mts. (western part); West Tian Shan.

 

haberhaueri Staudinger, 1886 (Epynephele). Stettiner entomologische Zeitschrift, 47: 247. TL: “Alai” – by the lectotype (Lukhtanov & Lukhtanov, 1994: 124). Had been originally described as a good species.

·       haberhaueri Staudinger, 1886 (Epynephele). D: North Alai; eastern parts of mountain ridges Gissarsky, Zeravshansky and Turkestansky; Syrdarjinsky Karatau Mts. in West Tian Shan as well as the West Tian Shanian mountain ranges Karzhantau, Pskemsky, Ugamsky, Sandalashsky, Koksujsky, Kuraminsky, Talassky, Tshatkalsky; Naryntau Mts.; Kirghiz Mts.

·       ocellata Samodurov in Samodurow, Tschikolowez & Korolew, 1995 (Hyponephele). Atalanta, Würzburg, 26: 168; Textabbn.  3 g, 4 m; Taf. 3, Abbn. 5, 6, 5A, 6A. TL: “S.Kirgisien, nördliche Abhänge des äuβersten östlichen Teiles der Alai-Gebk., Oberlauf des Fluβes Tar, Ail Kysyldshar, 2100 m”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of haberhaueri. D: Eastern part of Alai Mts.;  Fergansky Mts.

 

hilaris Staudinger, 1886 (Epinephele). Stettiner entomologische Zeitschrift, 47: 249. TL: “Margelan” – by the lectotype (Lukhtanov & Lukhtanov, 1994: 129). Had been originally described as a good species.

·       bori Herz, 1900 (Epinephele).  Annales Musei Academiae Scientarum, Zoologia, Saint-Petersburg, 5: 446. TL: “Kischlak Bori”. Had  been originally described as a variety of hilaris. D: Gissar; Darvaz.

·       djalali Wyatt & Omoto, 1966 (Hyponephele). Entomops, Nicé, 6: 185 – 186; figs. TL: “Shiva Mts., N.E. Badachshan, 2,700 m”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of hilaris. D: West Pamir.

·       hilaris Staudinger, 1886 (Epinephele). D: Alai; Tian Shan (without Inner Tian Shan).

·       pallida Samodurov, 2000 (Hyponephele). Atalanta, 31 (1/2): 161 – 162; Textabb.; Farbtaf. 12, Abbn. 7, 8. TL: “Inn. Tian-Shan, W. Kokschaal Mts., Kuldzha-Bashi r., 3200 m”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of hilaris. D: Inner Tian Shan (At-Bashi Mts., Kokshaaltau Mts., Naryntau Mts., Baibichetau Mts., Baidulu Mts. etc).

·       tsvetajevi Samodurov, 1996 (Hyponephele). Nachrichten des entomologischen Vereins Apollo, N.F., Frankfurt am Main, 17: 25 – 26; Abbn. 3, 15. TL: “Usbekistan, Turkestanski-Gebirgskette, loc. Woruch, Alamajdan.” Had been originally described as a subspecies of hilaris. D: Turkestansky Mts.

 

huebneri Koçak, 1980 (Hyponephele). Nota lepidopterologica, 2 (4): 140 [nom. nov. pro Papilio narica Hübner, [1808 – 1813], nec Papilio narica Fabricius, 1793]. TL: South Ural. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       huebneri Koçak, 1980 (Hyponephele). D: South of European part; deserts and steppes of Kazakhstan, Turkmenia and Uzbekistan.

·       iliensis Lukhtanov, 1999 (Hyponephele). Atalanta, Würzburg, 30 (1/4): 142. TL: “Südost-Kasachstan, Alma-Ata-Gebiet, Ili-Tal, Taschkarasu, 500 m.” Had been originally described as a subspecies of huebneri. D: valleys of Ili and Saisan.

 

interposita Erschoff in Fedtschenko, 1874 (Epinephele). Reise nach Turkestan, 2 5 (3) (Lepidoptera): 22; Tab. 2, Fig. 16. TL: Samarkand. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       depressa Korolew, 1995 (Hyponephele). Atalanta, Würzburg, 26: 189 – 190; Textabbn. 13 f – k, 14 h – m; Taf. 5, Abbn. 3, 4, 3A, 4A. TL: “SW Tadshikistan, Tabaktschi-Geb., Unterlauf des Wachsch-Fl., Kalininabad”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of interposita. D: SW Tadshikistan; Kopet Dagh; South Gissar.

·       interposita Erschoff in Fedtschenko, 1874 (Epinephele). D: Tian Shan; Alai; Gissar; Darvaz; South Altai.

·       mimonovi Samodurov, 1995  (Hyponephele). Atalanta, Würzburg, 26: 188 – 189; Textabn. 13 m, 14 n, p, q; Taf. 5, Abbn. 3, 4, 3A, 4A.  TL: “N.Usbekistan, Karakalpakien, Tachtakupyr-Gegend, Sarkul-See”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of interposita. D: Karakalpakia in North Uzbekistan.

 

issykkuli Samodurov, 1996 (Hyponephele). Nachrichten des entomologischen Vereins Apollo, N.F., Frankfurt am Main, 17: 23 – 24; Abbn. 1, 13, 24 (N 266702). TL: “[Kirgisien, Terskej-Alatau], südl. Ufer des Issykkul-Sees, loc. Akoleng [12 km SO loc. Rybatschje (jetzt Issykkul)]”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       issykkuli Samodurov, 1996 (Hyponephele). D: “Kirgisien, sьdliches Ufer des Issykkul-Sees, Gebirgskette Terskej-Alatau” (Samodurow et al., 1996: 24).

 

jasavi Lukhtanov, 1990 (Hyponephele). Vestnik zoologii, Kiev, 1990 (6): 18; ris. 5 (5, 6), 6. TL: “Казахская ССР, Чимкентская обл., хр. Сырдарьинский Каратау, р. Боялдыр в 40 км к северу от г. Кентау, 900 м” [Kazakhstan, Chimkent reg., Syrdarjinsky Karatau Mts., Boyaldyr river, 40 km N Kentau, 900 m]. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       jasavi Lukhtanov, 1990 (Hyponephele). D: Syrdarjinsky Karatau, Borkolday and Talassky mountain ridges in West Tian Shan; possible in the western part of Kirghiz Mts.

 

kirghisa Alphéraky, 1881 (Epynephele). Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, Sankt-Petersburg, 16: 423; Tab. 15, fig. 24, 25. TL: “Kouldjа”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       chamyla Staudinger, 1901 (Epinephele). Catalog der Lepidopteren des palaearktischen Faunengebietes, Berlin (ed. 3): 63. TL: “Tian. or.” – by the lectotype (Lukhtanov & Lukhtanov, 1994: 124). Had been originally described as a variety of kirghisa. D: North Tian Shan.

·       kirghisa Alphéraky, 1881 (Epinephele). D: Dzhungaria; eastern spurs of Kungey Ala-Too Mts.; Ketmen mountain ridge.

·       obscurata Samodurov, 1996 (Hyponephele). Nachrichten des entomologischen Vereins Apollo, N.F., Frankfurt am Main, 17: 33 – 34; Abbn. 9, 19, 24 (N 297403). TL: “Kirgisien, Kirgisische Gebirgskette (südl. Abhang), Gegenden Ails Aral, 35 km östl. Talas, 1950 m”. Had been originally  described as a  subspecies of kirghisa. D: Western part of Kirghiz Mts., southern slope.

·       terskeana Lukhtanov & Lukhtanov, 1994 (Hyponephele). Herbipoliana, Marktleuthen, 3: 123. TL: “Kirgisien, Westlicher Terskey-Alatau, Orto-Tokoi”. Had been originally  described as a subspecies of kirghisa. D: Western part of Terskey Ala-Too Mts.

 

korshunovi Lukhtanov, 1994 (Hyponephele). Atalanta, Würzburg, 25: 531 – 534; Taf. 17 b. TL: “Tadschikistan, Westtienschan, Kuraminski-Gebirge, Altyn-Topkan-Gegend, 1600 m” Had been originally described as a  good species.

·       korshunovi Lukhtanov, 1994 (Hyponephele). D: West Tian Shan: Kuraminsky Mts.

 

laeta Staudinger, 1886 (Epynephele). Stettiner entomologische Zeitschrift, 47: 250. TL: “Osch” – by the lectotype (Lukhtanov & Lukhtanov, 1994: 122). Had been originally described as a  variety of  cadusina.

·       laeta Staudinger, 1886 (Epynephele). D: Alai; Peter the Great Mts.; Gissarsky Mts.; Zeravshansky Mts.; Kirghiz Mts.; Talassky Mts.; Suusamyrtoo Mts.; region betveen Kirghiz Mts. and Alai.

·       ochracea Samodurov, 1996 (Hyponephele). Nachrichten des entomologischen Vereins Apollo, N.F., Frankfurt am Main, 17: 31 – 32; Abbn. 7, 20, 24 (N 242010). TL: “Usbekistan, Kuraminskyi Ridge, Kamshik [!] Pass, 2500 – 2700 m”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of laeta. D: West Tian Shan (without Talassky Mts.).

·       turkestana Samodurov, 1996 (Hyponephele). Nachrichten des entomologischen Vereins Apollo, N.F., Frankfurt am Main, 17: 32 – 33; Abbn. 8, 21, 24 (N 245708). TL: “[Tadschikistan], Turkestanski-Gebirgskette Kumbel-Paβ, 3000 – 3200 m”. Had been originally  described as a subspecies of laeta. D: Turkestansky Mts.

 

lupina Costa, [1836] (Satyrus). Fauna del Regno di Napoli ossia enumerazione di tutti gli animali che abitano le diverse regioni di questo regno e le acque che le bagnano contenente la descrizione de nuovi o poco esattamente conosciuti con figure ricavate da originale viventi e dipinte al naturele. Lepidotteri. Napoli: [69], [311]. TL: Otranto, Bosco di Guagnano, Napoli. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       intermedia Staudinger, 1886 (Epinephele). Stettiner entomologische Zeitschrift, 47: 251. TL:  “Im der niedriger (heißer) gelegenen Gegenden Central- und Klein-Asiens sowie Südruβlands (nach Alphemlei)”,  but “Amasia” by the lectotype designation (Wagener in Samodurow et al., 2001: 160). Had been originally described as a variety of lycaon. D: Middle Asia and Kazakhstan; Altai.

·       kopetdagica Samodurov in Samodurow, Korolew & Tschikolowez, 2001 (Hyponephele). Atalanta, Würzburg, 32 (1/2): 168 – 171; Farbtaf. 11, Abbn. 1, 2. TL: “[Turkmenien], Aschchabad-Gegend, Firjusa”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of lupina. D: Kopet-Dagh.

·       lanata Alphéraky, 1876 (Epinephele).  Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, Sankt-Petersburg, 10: 11. TL: North Caucasus. Had been originally described as a subspecies of lycaon. D: Crimea; Caucasus.

·       lupina Costa, [1836] (Saturys). D: South of middle of European part; South and Middle Ural; South-West Sibirien and Transural.

·       transcaucasica Jachontov, 1910 (Epinephele). Revue Russe d’Entomologie, Moscow, 10: 48. TL: “Mzkheta”. Had been originally  described as a variety (subspecies) of lupina. D: Transcaucasus.

 

lycaon Rottemburg, 1775 (Papilio). Naturforscher, Halle, 6: 17. TL: Brandenburg, Berlin region. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       alpherakyi Sheljuzhko, 1937 (Epinephele). Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstage von Prof. Dr. Embrik Strand, Riga, 2: 348. TL: “Teberda” – by the lectotype (Nekrutenko, 1990: 149). Had been originally described as a subspecies of lycaon. D: Great Caucasus; Little Caucasus.

·       jakovlevi Korolev in Samodurow, Korolew & Tschikolovez, 2001 (Hyponephele). Atalanta, Würzburg, 32 (1/2): 131 – 132; Abb. 75; Farbtaf. 11, Abbn. 7, 8. TL: “Zentr. Altai [Kosch-Agatschski Rayon], Fluß Karagem-Tal, 1300 m”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of lycaon. D:  TL.

·       lycaon Rottemburg, 1775 (Papilio). D: European part (without north); Kazakhstan;  Altai; Middle and South Ural; SW Siberia.

·       zuvandica Samodurov & Koroljev, 1996 (Hyponephele). Nachrichten des entomologischen Vereins Apollo, N.F., Frankfurt am Main, 17: 28 – 29; Abbn. 5, 17, 24 (N 240804). TL: “Aserbajdschan, Talysch, Zuvand, loc. Gosmoljan, 1400 m”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of lycaon. D: Transcaucasus.

 

maureri Staudinger, 1886 (Epinephele). Stettiner entomologische Zeitschrift, 47: 246. TL: “Südliche Alaj”. Had been originally described as a variety of haberhaueri.

·       galtscha Grum-Grshimailo, 1893 (Epinephele). Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, St.Petersburg, 27: 128. TL: “Iskander-Kul” – by the holotype (by homonimy). Had been originally described as a variety of lycaon. D: central parts of Seravshan, Gissar and Peter the Great mountain ridges.

·       maureri Staudinger, 1886 (Epinephele). D: Western part of Alai valley; northern slope of Peter the Great Mts. (eastern part).

·       subnephele Stshetkin, 1963  (Epinephele). Trudy instituta zoologii i parasitologii AN Tadzhikskoj SSR, Dushanbe, 24: 44. TL: “вхребтеХозратишоинасопкеХоджа-Мумин” [Khozratishoh Mts. and Khodzha-Mumin Mt.]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of rueckbeili. D: Gissar Mts. (southern slope); Karateginsky Mts.; Babatagh Mts.; Khozratishokh Mts; mountain ridges of south-west Tadzhikistan; western and central part of Peter the Great Mts.

 

murzini Dubatolov, 1989 (Hyponephele). Proceedings of the Zoological Institute, Leningrad, 200: 139. TL: “Узбекистан, Кураминский хр., пер. Камчик” [Uzbekistan, Kuraminsky Mts., Kamchik pass]. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       murzini Dubatolov, 1989 (Hyponephele). D: West Tian Shan: mountain ridges Ugamsky, Kuraminsky and Karzhantau; possible in other West Tian Shanian ranges.

 

naricina Staudinger, 1870 (Epinephele). Berliner entomologische Zeitschrift, 14: 100. TL: “Mangischlak” – by the lectotype (Lukhtanov & Lukhtanov, 1994: 126). Had been originally described as a good species.

·       naricina Staudinger, 1870 (Epinephele). D: South of European part; deserts and semideserts of Middle Asia and Kazakhstan.

 

naricoides Gross, 1977 (Hyponephele). Atalanta, Würzburg, 8: 125. TL: NE Anatolia, 10 km NW of Erdzinzhan, 1500 m. Had been originally described as a  subspecies of naricina.

·       naricoides Gross, 1977 (Hyponephele). D: West Kopet Dagh; Talysh; South Armenia; Nakhichevan.

 

naubidensis Erschoff in Fedtschenko, 1874 (Epinephele). Reise nach Turkestan, 2, 5 (3) (Lepidoptera): 21; Tab. 5, Fig. 73. TL: Mt. Naubid “in Turkestano Rossico”. Had been originally described as a  variety of  “amardea”.

·       naubidensis Erschoff in Fedtschenko, 1874 (Epinephele). D: All Middle Asiatic mountains without Pamir.

 

 pamira Lukhtanov, 1990 (Hyponephele). Vestnik zoologii, Kiev, 1990 (6): 16 – 17; ris. 3 (1 – 4), 4 (1). TL: “Западный Памир, верховья р. Тогузбулак, 3800 м” [West Pamir, upper course of Toguzbulak river, 3800 m]. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       jacobsoni Lukhtanov, 1990 (Hyponephele). Vestnik zoologii, Kiev, 1990 (6): 17; ris. 3 (5, 6). TL: “ВосточныйПамир, ПамирскийПост” [East Pamir, Pamirsky Post]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of pamira. D: East Pamir; Central Pamir: mountain ridges Severo- and Yuzhno-Alichursky, Vakhansky, Pshartsky, Muzkol, etc.).

·       pamira Lukhtanov, 1990 )Hyponephele). D: West Pamiric mountain ridges from Vanchsky (in north) to Shakhdarinsky (in south).

 

pasimelas Staudinger, 1886  (Epinephele). Stettiner entomologische Zeitschrift, 47: 251. TL: “bei Raddefskaja, im Amurgebiet”. Had been originally described as a variety of lupina.

·       pasimelas Staudinger, 1886 (Epinephele). D: Amur region.

·       monochromus Korb, 2000 (Hyponephele). Alexanor, Paris, 21 (1): 52; figs. 4, 11, 12, 17, 18. TL: “Région de l’Oussouri, Dalněgorsk”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of Hyponephele pasimelas. D: Ussuri region.

 

prasolovi Lukhtanov, 1990 (Hyponephele). Vestnik zoologii, Kiev, 1990 (6): 17 – 18; ris. 5 (1 – 4), 4 (2). TL: “Таджикская ССР, Гиссарский хр., ущ. Сиама, 2600 м” [Tadzhikistan, Gissarsky Mts., Siama valley, 2600 m]. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       prasolovi Lukhtanov, 1990 (Hyponephele). D: Mountain ridges Gissarsky (southern slope, western and central part), Mechetly and Karateginsky.

 

tenuistigma Moore, 1892 (Maniola). Lepidoptera Indica, 2: 48; pl. 103, fig. 4.  TL: “Khojak, Baluchistan”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       laspura Evans, 1932 (Maniola). The identification of Indian butterflies, Madras: 112 – 113.  TL: “Chitral over 9,000 feet”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of tenuistigma. D: West Pamir.

 

tristis Grum-Grshimailo, 1893 (Epinephele). Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, Sankt-Petersburg, 27: 128. TL: “Iskanderkul-See, Fluβ Jagnobdarja” (Samodurow et al., 1996b: 236). Had been originally described as a variety of dysdora.

·       tristis Grum-Grshimailo, 1893 (Epinephele). D: Mountain ridges Gissarsky, Zeravshansky, Mrchitly, Bajsuntau, Kugitangtau, Peter the Great.

·       tshikolovetsi Samodurov, 1996 (Hyponephele). Atalanta, Würzburg, 27: 240 – 241; Textabbn. 20 (h, i), 21 (h), 22 (f). TL: “[Usbekistan], Hissar-Alaj, Turkestanski Gebirgskette [westlicher Teil], Kischlak Shum-Shum, 1600 m”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of tristis. D: Western part of Turkestansky Mts.

 

przhewalskyi Dubatolov, Sergeev & Z[h]danko, 1994 (Hyponephele). Atalanta, Würzburg,  25: 171 – 172; figs. 1, 2. TL: “Kyrgyzstan, Issyk Kul, Przhevalsk”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       przhevalskyi Dubatolov, Sergeev & Z[h]danko, 1994 (Hyponephele). D: North Tian Shan.

 

pseudokirgisa Stshetkin, 1984 (Hyponephele). Zoological Journal, Moscow, 63: 1582 – 1584; ris. 1, 2 a. TL: “западная часть Зеравшанского хребта, урочище Аман-Кутан, 1400 м” [western part of Zeravshansky Mts., Aman-Kutan valley, 1400 m]. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       pseudokirgisa Stshetkin, 1984 (Hyponephele). D: Western parts of the ridges Gissarsky and Zeravshansky, mountain ridges Bajsuntau and Kugitangtau.

 

pulchra Felder & Felder, 1867 (Epinephele). Reise der österreichischen Fregatte Novara, Wein, Lepidoptera: 491. TL: Had been originally described as a good species.

·       baroghila Tytler, 1926 (Epinephele). The Journal of the Bombay natural history Society, 31: 257. TL: “from the extreme north-east corner of Chitral and the watershed between Chitral and Wakhan, Afghanistan and the adjoining country of the extreme north-west of Yasin in Gilgit at elevations over 9000’”. D: South Pamir.

 

rubriceps Herz, 1900 (Epinephele). Annales Musei zoologici Scientarum, Sankt-Petersburg, 5: 446. TL: “Kischlak Urgut”  – by the lectotype (Lukhtanov in Samodurov et al., 1997: 86). Had been originally described as a variety of haberhaueri.

Remark. The specific rank by Samodurow et al., 1997: 86.

Remark. “Im Jahre 1991 ist von Dubatolov auch die Unterart H. toharica karacongrada Dub., 1991 aus der Kugitangtau-Gebirgskette beschrieben worden. Wir hatten nocht die Möglichkeit, die Typen von t. toharica Dbtl. & Serg. aus der Tujuntau-Gebirgskette in Südtadschikistan zu untersuchen. Der Vergleich der Serie der kugitangischen Tieren mit der Abbildung und Beschreibung der Ausweisung dieser Population als eigene Unterart hervor. Die Ausweisung des Lektotypus von rubriceps und die genannten Untersuchungen führen zu folgender Syninymie: Hyponephele rubriceps Herz, 1900, stat.nov. = toharica Dubatolov & Sergeev, 1991, syn.n.; = karakongrada Dubatolov, 1991, syn.nov.” (Samodurow et al., 1997: 86 – 87).

 

rueckbeili Staudinger, 1887 (Epinephele). Stettiner entomologische Zeitschrift, 48: 63. TL: “Issyk Kul” – by the lectotype (Lukhtanov & Lukhtanov, 1994: 125). Had been originally described as a good species.

·       rueckbeili Staudinger, 1887 (Epinephele). D: Mountain ridges Terskey Ala Too, Bajdulu, Naryntoo, Kirghiz (eastern part).

 

rufomaculata Korb, 2005. TL: Gorky [now Nizhny Novgorod], Artemovskye meadows. D: Only known from the Nizhny Novgorod region.

 

sheljuzhkoi Samodurov & Tshikolovets, 1996 (Hyponephele). Nachrichten des entomologischen Vereins Apollo, N.F., Frankfurt am Main, 17: 28 – 31; Abbn. 6, 18, 24 (N 241309, 239404). TL: “[Kirgisia, Innerer Tienschan], Naryn”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       sheljuzhkoi Samodurov & Tshikolovets, 1996 (Hyponephele). D: Inner Tian Shan.

 

Tribus Oeneini Wheeler, 1903

 

 Entomological Montley Magazine, London, 4: 121. TS: Satyrus pumilus Felder & Felder, [1867].

 

palaearctica Staudinger, 1889 (Aulocera). Stettiner entomologische Zeitschrift, 50: 20 - 21. TL: “Gebirgen südlich vom Issyk-Kul”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       palaearctica Staudinger, 1889 (Aulocera). D: Only one time was indicated for Kizyl-Art (possible in Transalai Mts.) (D’Abrera, 1992: 224)..

 

pumilus Felder & Felder, [1867] (Chionobas). Reisen der Österreichischen Fregate Novara, Wien: 490; Tab. 69, fig. 6, 7. TL: “at ‘Trantse Sumdo on the Lanak Pass at about 15.000 feet elevation, and at Pangebog’” (Moore, [1893]: 37). Had been originally described as a good species.

·       pumilus Felder & Felder, [1867] (Satyrus). D: South Pamir, Sarykolsky Mts.

 

Verzeichniss bekannter Schmett[er]linge, Augsburg, (4): 58. TS: Papilio norna Thunberg, 1791.

Subgenus Oeneis sensu stricto

 

actaeoides Lukhtanov, 1989 (Oeneis). Vestnik zoologii, Kiev, 1989 (4): 30; ris. 1 (3). TL: “Эндыбальск[ий] завод, Верхоянск[ий] окр[уг], дол[ина] р. Эндыбал” [Endybalskij zavod, Verkhojanskij okrug, valley of Endybal river]. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       actaeoides Lukhtanov (Oeneis). D: NW Yakutia.

·       czekanowskii Lukhtanov, 1989 (Oeneis). Vestnik zoologii, Kiev, 1989 (4): 30 – 31; ris. 1 (4). TL: “В[ерхняяТомба], прит[ок] Оленека, Якут[ский] о[круг]” [Verkhnaja Tomba, the source of Olenek river, Yakutsky okrug]. Had been originally described as a  subspecies of actaeoides. D: Central and East Yakutia; Magadan region; Chukotka.

 

agaskyra Korshunov & Nikolaev, 2002 (Oeneis). Butterflies of North Asia. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press: 331 – 332. TL: “Хакасия, оз. Агаскыр в окр. с. Сарала, ок. 800 м” [Khakassia, Agaskyr Lake near Sarala village, about 800 m]. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       agaskyra Korshunov & Nikolaev, 2002 (Oeneis). D: Khakassia; Tuva.

 

akoene Belik & Yakovlev, 1998 (Oeneis). Phegea, Amtwerpen, 26: 132 – 135, col.  pl. TL: “Russia, Altai Mts., Ukok plateau, 6 km SE of Belyashi (Dzhazator) village, mouth of Kudaby river valley, 1300 – 1600 m”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of jutta.

·       akoene Belik & Yakovlev, 1998 (Oeneis). D: Central and South Altai.

 

aktashi Lukhtanov, 1984 (Oeneis). Revue d’Entomologie de l’URSS, Léningrad, 53: 785 – 787; ris. 43 – 50, 52 – 54, 55 – 57. TL: “Алтай, Курайский хребет, 10 – 15 км к северо-востоку от пос. Акташ, 2500 – 2700 м” [Altai, Kuraisky Mts., 10 – 15 km NE of Aktash, 2500 – 2700 m]. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       aktashi Lukhtanov, 1984 (Oeneis). D: Altai.

·       ona Korshunov, 1996 (Oeneis). Dopolnenija i ispravlenija k knige “Dnevnye babochki asiatskoj chasti Rossii”. Novosibirsk: 38. TL: “Истокир. Оны, Саянскийперевал, хр. Сайлыг-Хем-Тайга” [upper course of Ona river, Sayansky pass, Saylyg-Khem-Tajga mountain ridge]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of aktashi. D: West Sayan.

·       sarala Korshunov, 1988 (Oeneis). Taksonomija zhivotnykh Sibiri, Novosibirsk: 74 – 76; ris. 7 (g, d), 8 (a). TL: “КузнецкийАлатау, верховьяр. СаралыугорыБобровой” [Kusnezky Alatau Mts., upper course of Sarala river near Bobrovaja Mt.]. Had been originally described as a good species. D: Kusnezky Alatau Mts.

 

alpina Kurentzov, 1970 (Oeneis). Bulavousye cheshuekrylye Dalnego Vostoka SSSR: Opredelitel. LeningraD: 50, 74; ris. 42 (2), 44 (1). TL: “в гольцах Омсукчанского хребта (восточные отроги Колымского хребта)” [in the goltsy of Omsukchansky Mts. (eastern spurs of Kolymsky Mts.]. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       alpina Kurentzov, 1970 (Oeneis). D: “Известенпонемногимэкземплярам, собраннымвсеверныхотрогахКолымскогохребта (Омсукчанскийхр., п. Билибино, р. Анадырь)” (Korshunov & Gorbunov, 1995: 140) [It is known only in some specimens which

·       were collected in the northern spurs of Kolymsky Mts. (Omsukchansky Mts., Bilibino, Anadyr’ river).

 

also Boisduval, [1834] (Chionobas). Icones historiques des Lépidoptères  nouveaux ou peu connus. Paris: Roret: 197. TL: “Sibérie” (Kamtchatka – by Korshunov & Nikolaev, 2002: 167). Had been originally described as a good species.

·            also Boisduval, [1834] (Chionobas). D: Polar Ural; Yamal; Taymyr; Kamchatka.

 

altaica Elwes, 1899 (Oeneis). Transactions of the Royal entomological Society of London, 1899: 353; pl. 13, fig. 2, 5. TL: Altai. Had been originally described as a variety of norna.

·            altaica Elwes, 1899 (Oeneis). D: Altai.

·            kalarica Korshunov & Nikolaev, 2002 (Oeneis). Butterflies of North Asia. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press: 325 – 326. TL: “Читинская обл., Сохогдинский заповедник, Верх. Букукун, ок. 2000 м” [Chita area, Sokhondinsky reserve, Verkhny Bukukun, about 2000 m].  Had been originally described as a good species. D: Transbaikal.

·          tshukota Korshunov, 1998 (Oeneis). Novye opisanija i utochnenija dlja knigi Dnevnye babochki asiatskoj chasti Rossii, Novosibirsk: 29. TL: "20 кмвверхпор. АнадырьотМарково" [20 km upper the river Anadyr from Markovo]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of chione. D: Chukotka.

 

ammon Elwes, 1899 (Oeneis). Transactions of the Royal entomological Society of London, 1899: 356; pl. 14, fig. 2, 7. TL: Altai, steppe of Chuja. Had been originally described as a variety of bore.

Remark. In the book of Korshunov (1998: 28) about this taxon is written: "Приходится обратить внимание на приведение Oeneis arasaguna Austaut, 1911 синонимом к ammon у V.K.Tuzov в книге "Butterflies of Russia", v. 1, 1997 год. Да с пометкой, что распространение ammon ограничено ("confived") Алтаем и Саянами. Но arasaguna описана из Монголии из долины реки Арсайн-гол рядом с озером Хупсугул, между хребтами Сордил-Сарьдаг и Баян-Ула. Г.Е.Грум-Гржимайло в книге "Западная Монголия и Урянхайский край", т. 1, С.-Петерб., 1914: 222 называет эту реку Ара-Сай (поблагодарим за помощь уважаемого лингвиста из Москвы доктора С.Л.Николаева). Разницамежду arasaguna и ammon явная". [It is necessary to pay attention to reduction Oeneis arasaguna Austaut, 1911 synonym to ammon at V.K.Tuzov in the book "Butterflies of Russia", v. 1, 1997. Yes with a mark, that the distribution of ammon is limited ("onfived") to Altai and Sayan. But arasaguna is described from Mongolia from a valley of the river Arsajn-Gol near to lake Khupsugul, between ranges Khordil-Sar'dagh and Bayan-Ula. G.E.Grum-Grshimailo in the book "Western Mongolia and Uryankhajsk territory", v. 1, Saint-Petersburg., 1914: 222 names this river as Ara-Saj (we shall thank for the help of dear linguist from Moscow of the doctor S.L.Nikolaev). A difference between arasaguna and ammon is obvious]. But I'm agree with opinion of V.K.Tuzov.

·       ammon Elwes, 1899 (Oeneis). D: Altai; Sayan; Tuva.

 

ammosovi Dubatolov & Korshunov, 1988 (Oeneis). Taksonomija zhivotnykh Sibiri, Novosibirsk: 63 – 64; ris. 2 (zh), 3. TL: “Правый берег Лены близ Якутска, пос. Хаптагай, плато, остепнённый склон” [Right shore of Lena river near Yakutsk, Khaptagay, a plateau, steppe slope]. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       ammosovi Dubatolov & Korshunov, 1988 (Oeneis). D: TL.

 

arasaguna Austaut, 1911 (Oeneis). Entomologische Zeitschrift, 24: 243. TL: “Arasagun-Gol”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       arasaguna Austaut, 1911 (Oeneis). D: East Sayan.

 

bore Schneider, 1792 (Papilio). Neuestes Magazin für die Liebhaber der Entomologie, 1: 415. TL: “Lappland”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       bore Schneider, 1792 (Papilio). D: Polar Europa; Polar Siberia.

·       mackinliensis dos Passos, 1949 (Oeneis). American Museum Novitates, 1389: 35. TL: McKinley Park, Alaska. Had been originally described as a subspecies of bore. D: Chukotka.

 

chione Austaut, 1911 (Oeneis). Entomologische Zeitschrift, 24: 244. TL: Okhotsk. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          chione Austaut, 1911 (Oeneis). D: North-east of Asia.

 

elwesi Staudinger, 1901 (Oeneis). Catalog der Lepidopteren des palaearktischen Faunengebietes (ed. 3): 52. TL: “Altai or.[ientalis]”  – by the lectotype (Lukhtanov, 1989: 32). Had been originally described as a variety of mulla.

·       elwesi Staudinger, 1901 (Oeneis). D: SE Altai.

·       ulugchemi Korshunov in Korshunov & Gorbunov, 1995 (Oeneis). Dnevnye babochki asiatskoj chasti Rossii, Ekaterinburg: 139. TL: “Тува, окр. Кызыла, горынаправомберегур. Улуг-Хем, близустьяКа-Хема”. [Tuva, Kyzyl vicinity, mountains on the right shore of Ulug-Khem river, near the under course of Ka-Khem]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of elwesi. D: Tuva.

 

excubitor Troubridge, Philip, Scott & Shepard, 1982 (Oeneis). Canadian Entomologist, 114: 881 – 885; figs. 1 – 9. TL: “Yukon: Mt. Chambers, Ogilvie Mts., hilltop 4 km E., 1400 m”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       ostracon Korb, 1996 (Oeneis). Vestnik zoologii, Kiev, 1996 (4 – 5): 101. TL: “Магаданскаяобл., пос. Палатка” [Magadan reg., Palatka]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of excubitor. D: Magadan region in vicinity of Palatka; possible in Chukotka.

Remark. In last "Additions" of Y.P.Korshunov (1998: [71]) about Oeneis excubitor the following is written: "16.04.1998 из РЖ [я] узнал об описании таксона ostracon для Oeneis excubitor Troubridge et al., 1982 из Магаданской обл (...). Одно то, что excubitor приводится для нашей фауны, к которой он не относится, и в "Вестнике зоологии", где на эту тему было подробное объяснение В.Лухтанова (...), вызывает досаду и удивление. Объяснение гласило, что alpina и excubitor – разные виды. Похожих бабочек северо-востока Азии можно связывать только с alpina. Кстати, и в книге "Butterflies of Russia" зря в графе распространения alpina стоит "Alaska". [16.04.1998  from Referative Journal [I] has found out about the description of taxon ostracon for Oeneis excubitor Troubridge et al., 1982 from the Magadan region (...). One that excubitor is resulted for ours fauna, to which it does not concern, and in "Vestnik zoologii", where on this theme there was a detailed explanation of V.Lukhtanov (...), causes disappointment and surprise. The explanation said, that alpina and excubitor are different species. The similar butterflies of northeast of Asia can be connected only with alpina. By the way, and in the book "Butterflies of Russia" wrongly in the column of distribution of alpina there is "Alaska"]. It is a pity, certainly, that Y.P.Korshunov is so categorical – as follows from him of lines, he did not see not only material on excubitor, but also description (!!!). I bring in the chronological order of the citation about this species. "These classical taxonomic comparisons indicate that O. excubitor is distinct from all other nearctic species. Altough O. excubitor is very different from all other palaearctic species, its relationship with O. alpina (Kurentzov) is unclear. O. alpina is known from one specimen, captured by V.N.Kurnakov, 7 June 1953, from the barren rocks of the Omsuchansk (Kolyma) Range in the Magadanskaya Oblast, U.S.S.R. Kurentzov's figure (1970, p. 47, fig. 2) of the holotype is a line drawing and for our purpose, does not adequately illustrate this species. We have been unsuccesfull in our efforts to obtain colour photographs of this specimen from the U.S.S.R. Kurentzov's figure vaguely resembles O. excubitor on the ventral surface, altough the ventral hindwing of O. alpina is shown with less mottling than is present on that of O. excubitor, and the mesial band of O. alpina is shown to be very much darker than that of O. excubitor and more closely approaches that of certain examples of O. uhleri cairnesi (Gibson). Kurentzov's figure shows heavier spotting than 96% of the specimens of O. excubitor we have examined, with dorsal surface ocelli in cells M₁, M₃ and CU₁ of the forewing and cells M₃, CU₁, and CU₂ of the hindwing. The hindwing ocellus in cell CU₂ is absent in all examples of O. excubitor that we have studied. Our most heavily spotted specimen of O. excubitor (...) approaches O. alpina on the dorsal surface, except it is missing the ocellus in hindwing cell CU₂, and it has an ocellus in hindwing cell M₁, which is absent in O. alpina. Kurentzov (1970, p. 50, fig. 1) shows the male valvae of O. alpina similar to certain examples of O. excubitor, but the uncus is shown to be much narrower than that of O. excubitor and is not narrowed at the base. This is a standard feature of O. excubitor and does not v[e]ry much in different specimens. Due to the aforementioned differences between O. alpina and O. excubitor, we must assume that they are separate species. Altough it is unlikely, it is possible that O. excubitor is actually a subspecies of O. alpina. A further analysis must await the collection of additional specimens of O. alpina" (Troubridge et al., 1982: 887). "Недавно с территории Аляски был описан новый вид O. excubitor, очень близкий к O. alpina (Troubridge et al., 1982). Поскольку авторы, описавшие O. excubitor, не располагали сравнительным материалом по O. alpina, то они допускали, что первый является подвидом второго. Сравнение экземпляра O. alpina с паратипом O. excubitor, хранящимся в ЗИН АН СССР, подтвердило видовую самостоятельность последнего. O. alpina отличается от O. excubitor несколько более светлой окраской крыльев, гораздо более слабым развитием струйчатого рисунка на нижней стороне задних крыльев, формой срединной перевязи на исподе задних крыльев. Струйчатый рисунок у O. alpina развит только по краю задних крыльев. У O. excubitor он занимает всю поверхность задних крыльев с нижней стороны, кроме того он хорошо развит на исподе передних крыльев в их маргинальной и субмаргинальной частях. У O. alpina срединная перевязь на задних крыльях довольно узкая, с заметными выступами с обеих сторон, имеет неодинаковую ширину на своем протяжении. У O. excubitor перевязь шире, примерно одинаковой ширины на своем протяжении, без выступов и зубцов. Кроме того в отличие от O. alpina она не окружена широкими желтыми полями и окаймлена лишь немногочисленными светлыми чешуйками" [Recently from territory of Alaska the new species  O. excubitor was described. O. excubitor is very close to O. alpina (Troubridge et al., 1982). As the authors who have described O. excubitor, had not a comparative material on O. alpina, they supposed, that first is subspecies of the second. Comparison of a specimen of O. alpina with the paratypus of O. excubitor stored in the Zoological Institute of the Academy of Sciences of USSR, has confirmed the specific independence of last. O. alpina differs from O. excubitor by a little bit more light colouring of wings, much weaker development of marble pattern on the bottom party of hindwings, form of the middle belt on the underside of hindwing. The marble pattern at O. alpina is advanced only on border of hindwings. At O. excubitor it occupies all surface of  hindwings from the bottom party, besides it is well advanced on underside of forewings in them marginal  and submarginal parts. At O. alpina the middle belt on hindwings rather narrow, with appreciable ledges from both parties, has unequal width on the extent. At O. excubitor this belt is wider, approximately identical width on the extent, without ledges and cogs. Besides as against O. alpina it is not surrounded with wide yellow fields and is bordered only not numerous light scales] (Lukhtanov, 1989: 31 – 32). "В 1992 г. автор получил от В.В.Багликова сборы дневных бабочек из района пос. Палатка и пос. Карамкен Магаданской обл., в которых оказалось несколько экземпляров O. excubitor. Автором были просмотрены значительные материалы по Oeneis группы norna из окрестностей стационара "Абориген" Тенькинского р-на Магаданской обл. (сборы Г.А.Ануфриева, 1987 г.), в которых было обнаружено 2 экз. этого вида (...) Кроме того, в сборах В.В.Багликова было обнаружено 12 ♂ и 1 ♀ этого вида; еще 2 ♂O. excubitor В.В.Багликов передал Ю.Б.Косареву. Изучение этих экземпляров, а также изображений, сопровождающих описание вида, позволило заключить, что на территории Палеарктики вид представлен отличным от номинативного подвидом, обладающим значительно меньшим размахом изменчивости в размерах и крыловом рисунке" [In 1992 the author has received from V.V.Baglikov the collection of the  butterflies from area of loc. Palatka and loc. Karamken of the Magadan province, in which has appeared some species of  O. excubitor. The author saw significant materials on Oeneis of group norna of vicinities of “Aborigen” station of the Tenkinsk district on the Magadan province (collected by G.A.Anufriev,  1987.), in which 2 specimens of this species were revealed (...) Besides in the collection of V.V.Baglikov  it was revealed 12 ♂♂ and 1 ♀ of this species; 2 ♂♂ of O. excubitor V.V.Baglikov has transferred to Y.B.Kosarev. The study of these specimens, and also images accompanying the description of a species, has allowed to conclude, that in territory of Palaearctis the species is submitted with subspecies distinct from nominotypical subspecies, having considerably smaller scope of variability in the sizes and wing pattern figure (Korb, 1996: 100). The presence in territory of Palaearctis of some nearctic species not is a nonsens, and there is a phenomenon well explained by two words:  the Beringian bridge. It is not necessary to forget about it.

 

fulla Eversmann, 1851 (Hipparchia). Bulletin de la Société impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou, 24: 614. TL: “Noor-Saisan-Gegend” – by the lectotype (Lukhtanov, 1987: 155). Had been originally described as a good species.

·       fulla Eversmann, 1851 (Hipparchia). D: Tarbagatai, Saur.

 

grumi Korshunov & Nikolaev, 2002 (Oeneis). Butterflies of North Asia. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press: 320 – 321. TL: “Тува, хр. Зап. Танну-Ола, пер. Хондергей, 1800 – 1900 м, горная тундра, сев. склон” [Tuva, Western Tannu-Ola Mts., Khondergey Pass, 1800 – 1900 m, montainous tundra, northern slope]. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       grumi Korshunov & Nikolaev, 2002 (Oeneis). D: Tannu-Ola Mts. in Tuva.

 

hilda Quensel, 1791 (Papilio). Acta holmiae: 265; Tab. 9, Fig. 7, 8. TL: “Lapponia”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       hilda Quensel, 1791 (Papilio). D: Polar Ural; Kola Peninsula.

 

hora Grum-Grshimailo, 1888 (Oeneis). Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, Sankt-Petersburg, 22: 307. TL: Alai valley. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       hora Grum-Grshimailo, 1888 (Oeneis). D: Alai; Inner Tian Shan; Central Tian Shan; North Tian Shan.

 

judini Korshunov, 1988 (Oeneis). Taksonomija zhivotnykh Sibiri, Novosibirsk: 76, 78; ris. 7 (b, w), 8 (b), 9 (a). TL: “Тува, хр. Восточный Танну-Ола, пос. Шурмак, остепнённый склон” [Tuva, Vostochny Tannu-Ola Mts., Shurmak, steppe slope]. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       judini Korshunov, 1988 (Oeneis). D: “Малоизвестныйвид. Самец обнаружен 6 июля 1973 г. на остепнённом склоне у п. Шурмак, самка – 20 июля 1972 г на перевале от р. Дурген к оз. Кара-Холь” [It is a little known species. The male collected 6th July 1973 on the steppe slope in the vicinity of Shurmak, the female was found 20th July 1972 on the pass between Durgen river and Kara-Khol’ lake] (Korshunov & Gorbunov, 1995: 141).

 

jutta Hübner, [1806] (Papilio). Sammlung europäischer Schmetterlinge, Augsburg, 1: Fig. 614, 615. TL: Lapland. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       balder Boisduval, 1832 (Chionobas). Icones historique des Lépidoptères nouveaux ou peu connus collections avec figures colorieers des papillons d’Europe nouvellement decouverts, Paris: 189; pl. 39, fig. 1 – 3. TL: “…au Cap-Nord, au Groenland et au Islande”. Had been originally described as a good species. D: Leningrad region, Karelia.

·       gigantea Austaut, 1911 (Oeneis). Entomologische Zeitschrift, Frankfurt am Main, 24: 243. TL: Ural, “Soymonovsk”. Had been originally described as a variety of jutta. D: Ural (without south).

·       jutta Hübner, [1806] (Papilio). D: North tayga of Europa and Siberia.

·       sachalinensis Matsumura, 1927 (Oeneis). Insecta Matsumurasca, 1: 128. TL: Sakhalin, “Tomarigishi, Katangri”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of jutta. D: Sakhalin.

·       timanica Sedykh, 1977 (Oeneis). Geograficheskye aspekty okhrany flory i fauny na severo-vostoke evropejskoj chasti SSSR, Syktyvkar: 103. TL: “Ухта” [Ukhta]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of jutta. D: Timanic mountains.

 

kardakovi Korshunov & Nikolaev, 2002 (Oeneis). Butterfies of North Asia. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press: 324 – 325. TL: “Сев.-Вост. Якутия, хр. Сунтар-Хаята, 232 км трассы Хандыга-Магадан” хТУ Yakutia, Suntar-Khayata Mts., 232 km of the Khandyga – Magaran road]. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       kardakovi Korshunov & Nikolaev, 2002 (Oeneis). D: TL.

 

lukhtanovi Korshunov, 2000 (Oeneis). Butterflies of Ural, Siberia and Far East. Novosibirsk: Korshunov Press: 99. TL: “хр. Сунтар-Хаята, верховья реки Верх. Хандыга” [Suntar-Khayata Mts., Verkhnyaya Khandyga river upper course]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of jutta.

·       lukhtanovi Korshunov, 2000 (Oeneis). D: ТУ Yakutia; NW Amur region.

 

magna Graeser, 1888 (Oeneis). Berliner entomologische Zeitschrift, 32: 97. TL: “Pochrofka”  – by the lectotype (Lukhtanov, 1987: 146). Had been originally described as a variety of jutta.

·       dubia Elwes, 1899 (Oeneis). Transactions of the Royal entomological Society of London, 1899: 354; pl. 13, fig. 6; pl. 14, fig. 3. TL: Altai, Ongudai. Had been originally described as a good species. D: Altai; West Sayan.

·       kamtschatica Kurentzov, 1970 (Oeneis). Bulavousye cheshuekrylye Dalnego Vostoka SSSR, LeningraD: 71; ris. 72 (2). TL: "долинар. Камчатки" [Kamchatka river valley]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of magna. D: Kamchatka; Chukotka.

·       kurentzovi Murayama, 1973 (Oeneis). Mushi, Tokyo, 29: 21 [nom. nov. pro Oeneis magna mongolica Kurentzov, 1970, nec Oeneis mongolica Oberthür, 1876]. TL: "всухихредкостойныхлиственничникахгорХангаявсевернойМонголии" [in the dry forests from Laryx sibirica in Khangai Mts. in northern Mongolia]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of magna. D: Tuva.

·       magadanica Kurentzov, 1970 (Oeneis). Bulavousye cheshuekrylye Dalnego Vostoka SSSR, LeningraD: 73; ris. 72 (1). TL: "большаячастьМагаданскойобластикюгудоШантарскихостровов" [a general part of the Magadan region southwards to Shantarskye islands]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of magna. D: Magadan region; Yakutia.

·       transbaicalica Kurentzov, 1970 (Oeneis). Bulavousye cheshuekrylye Dalnego Vostoka SSSR, LeningraD: 72; ris. 40 (4), 72 (3). TL: "вовсехлесныхрайонахЗабайкальяивобластилиственничнойлесостепи" [in all forest regions of Transbaikal and in the region of forest-steppe with Laryx sibirica]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of magna. D: Transbaikal.

 

melissa Fabricius, 1775 (Papilio). Systema entomologicae, sistens insectorum classes, ordines, genera, species, adiectis synonymis, locis descriptionibus, observationibus, Flensburgi, Lipsiae: 513. TL: "insula Terre neuve Americae". Had been originally described as a good species.

·          karae Kusnezov, 1925 (Oeneis). Compte Rendu d'Academiae des Sciences de l'URSS, Léningrad, 1925: 121. TL: "северТюменскойобласти, ПолярныйУрал" [north of Tjumen river, Polarnyj Ural] – by the lectotype (Lukhtanov, 1983: 766). Had been originally described as a forma of semidea Say, 1828. D: Polar tundras of European part and West Siberia.

·          orientalis Kurentzov, 1970 (Oeneis). Bulavousye cheshuekrylye Dalnego Vostoka SSSR, LeningraD: 69; ris. 38 (2). TL: "Магаданскаяобл." [Magadan reg.]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of ammon. D: Magadan region; Middle Far East; East Siberia; Chukotka; Kamchatka.

·          tunga Staudinger, 1894 (Oeneis). Deutsche entomologische Zeitschrift Iris, 7: 248; Taf. 9. fig. 1. TL: "Ost-Sajan-Gebiet" – by the lectotype (Lukhtanov, 1987: 153). Had been originally described as a good species. D: South Siberian mountains: Sayan, Tuva, Praebaikal, Transbaikal.

 

mulla Staudinger, 1881 (Oeneis). Stettiner entomologische Zeitschrift, 42: 270. TL: "auf dem südlichen Rücken des Tarbagatai". Had been originally described as a good species.

·          mulla Staudinger, 1881 (Oeneis). D: Saur; Tarbagatai.

 

nikolaevi Korshunov, 2002 (Oeneis). The butterflies of North Asia. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press: 324. TL: “Зап. Тува, 30 км ЮЗ п. Мугур-Аксы, г. Монгун-Тайга” [West Tuva, 30 km SW of Mugur-Aksy settlement, Mongun-Taiga Mt.]. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       nikolaevi Korshunov, 2002 (Oeneis). D: TL.

 

norna Thunberg, 1791 (Papilio). Dissertatio entomologica sistens Insecta Svecica, 2: 36. TL: Lapland. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          astafjevi Korshunov & Nikolaev, 2002 (Oeneis). Butterflies of North Asia. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press: 326 – 327. TL: “Северо-запад Амурской обл., Урушинский хр., 7 – 8 км СВ горы Халан, дол. ручья Хаимкан” [NW of Amur region, Urushinsky Mts., 7 – 8 km NE of Khalan Mt., Khaimkan river valley]. Had been originally described as a good species. D: Transbaikal; NW Amur region.

·          norna Thunberg, 1791 (Papilio). D: Kola peninsula; Polar, Subpolar and North Ural; southern part of Yamal peninsula.

·          oeno Boisduval, 1832 (Chionobas). Icones historique des Lépidoptères nouveaux ou peu connus collections avec figures colorieers des papillons d’Europe nouvellement decouverts, Paris, 1: 195. TL: “du nord de la Siberie”. Had been originally described as a good species. D: Chukotka, Kamchaka.

·          tundra A.Bang-Haas, 1912 (Oeneis). Deutsche entomologische Zeitschrift Iris, 26: 104. TL: "Arasagun-gol, Sajan" – by the lectotype (Lukhtanov & Lukhtanov, 1994: 144). Had been originally described as a variety of norna. D: Sayan; Praebaikal.

 

pansa Christoph, 1893 (Oeneis). Deutsche entomologische Zeitschrift Iris, 6: 87. TL: "Witim". Had been originally described as a variety of semidea.

·          arenaria Korshunov & Nikolaev, 2002 (Oeneis). Butterflies of North Asia. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press: 321. TL: “Ямал, на дороге к р. Тарседа, тундра” [Yamal Peninsula, on the road to the Torseda river, tundra]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of pansa. D: Polar Ural; Yamal Peninsula.

·          pansa Christoph, 1893 (Oeneis). D: Magadan region; region of the Vitim river.

·          stelleri Korshunov & Nikolaev, 2002 (Oeneis). Butterflies of North Asia. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press: 321. TL: “Зап. Чукотка, 100 км от Певека, Усть-Чаун” [West Chukotka, 100 km from Pevek, Ust’-Chaun]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of pansa. D:  Taymyr Peninsula; Chukotka; Kamchatka.

 

patrushevae Korshunov, 1985 (Oeneis). Sistematika i biologia chlenistonogikh i gelmintov, Novosibirsk: 63 – 64; ris. TL: "Полярный Урал, ст. Красный Камень, 1000 м над ур.м." [Polar Ural, Krasnyj Kamen', 1000 m]. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          arethusoides Lukhtanov, 1989 (Oeneis). Vestnik zoologii, Kiev, 1989 (4): 28 – 29; ris. 1 (2). TL: "Sredne-Kolymsk, Province Yakutsk, N.E.Siberia". Had been originally described as a subspecies of patrushevae. D: Yakutia; Magadan region; Chukotka.

·            mitrandir Korb, 2005. TL: Chita reg., Udokan, 1000 m. D: Known only from its type locality, possible in other montane countries of Transbaikal.

·          patrushevae Korshunov, 1985 (Oeneis). D: Polar Ural.

 

pavlovi Korshunov & Nikolaev, 2002 (Oeneis). Butterflies of North Asia. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press: 330 – 331. TL: “Читинская обл., Сохондинский заповедник, Верх. Букукун, горная тундра” [Chita Province, Verkhny Bukukun, Sokhondinskhy Reserve, montainous tundra]. Had been originally described as a good species.

·            pavlovi Korshunov & Nikolaev, 2002 (Oeneis). D: Amur area; Transbaikal.

 

philipi Troubridge, 1988 (Oeneis). Canadian Entomologist, 120: 684 – 686; figs. 1, 9 D – F, 12, 13 A, 14. TL: "Canada, Yukon Territory, km 1 Dempster Highway at Klondike River, 460 m". Had been originally described as a good species.

·          ssp.? D: Magadan region: Aborigen station, Palatka and Karamken vicinity.

 

polixenes Fabricius, 1775 (Papilio). Systema entomologicae, sistens insectorum classes, ordines, genera, species, adiectis synonymis, locis descriptionibus, observationibus, Flensenburgi; Lipsiae: 484. TL: "in America boreali". Had been originally described as a good species.

·          antonovae Lukhtanov, 1989 (Oeneis). Vestnik zoologii, Kiev, 1989 (2): 36; ris. 3 (4). TL: "р. ГыдаоколоустьяЯмбутосё" [Gyda river near mouth of Yambutosjo river]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of polixenes. D: Gydan peninsula; Taymyr peninsula.

·          beringiana Kurentzov, 1970 (Oeneis). Bulavousye cheshuekrylye Dalnego Vostoka SSSR, LeningraD: 73; ris. 41, 68. TL: "горныетундрыЧукотки" [mountainous tundra of Chukotka]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of polixenes. D: Chukotka; Kamchatka; Vrangel island; eastern part of Magadan region.

·          paior Lukhtanov, 1989 (Oeneis). Vestnik zoologii, Kiev, 1989 (4): 28. TL: "ПолярныйУрал, р. Харута-Шор" [Polar Ural, Kharuta-Shor river]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of polixenes.

 

 

pupavkini Korshunov in Korshunov & Gorbunov, 1995 (Oeneis). Dnevnye babochki asiatskoj chasti Rossii, Ekaterinburg: 141. TL: "Путоран, ср. течение р. Рыбная" [Putoran, middle course of Rybnaya river]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of magna.

·            pupavkini Korshunov in Korshunov & Gorbunov, 1995 (Oeneis). D: Polar Ural; under course of Enisej river.

 

rosovi Kurentzov, 1970 (Oeneis). Bulavousye cheshuekrylye Dalnego Vostoka SSSR, LeningraD: 49, 73; ris. 42 (1), 44 (6). TL: "в горах окрестностей Тугура на Охотском побережье,… на о. Карагинском у северо-восточных берегов Камчатки" [in the mountainous vicinity of Tugur of the Okhotskoe Sea coast,… on the Karaginsky island near north-eastern shores of Kamchatka]. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          rosovi Kurentzov, 1970 (Oeneis). D: TL.

 

?  saepestriata Sedykh, 1974 (Oeneis). Zhivotnyj mir Komi ASSR, Syktyvkar: 135 – 137. TL: Polar Ural. Had been originally described as a good species. D: Polar Ural.

Remark. "Aus dem Polarural wurde Oeneis saepestriata… nach einem ♂ beschrieben. Dieses ♂, das sich jetzt im ZISP befindet, hat eine ockelgelbliche Oberseite der Flügel und auf der Unterseite der Hinterflügel viele dunkle Striche. Leider ist der Hinterlieb des Falters verlorengegangen und es daher unmöglich, die Ausbildung der Kopulationsorgane zu untersuchen" (Lukhtanov & Lukhtanov, 1994: 143 – 144).

 

sapozhnikovi Korshunov, 1982 (Oeneis). Gelminty, klestshi i nasekomye, Novosibirsk: 86 – 88; ris. 1, 2. TL: "Монголия, Центральный аймак, 10 км сев.-зап. сомона Мунгэн-Морьт" [Mongolia, Central ajmak, 10 km NW of somon Mungen-Mor't]. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          sapozhnikovi Korshunov, 1982 (Oeneis). D: Tuva: Kysyl, Erzin, Sangilenskoje Nagorje; Tunkinskaya valley.

 

 

shurmaki Korshunov, 1988 (Oeneis). Taksonomija zhivotnykh Sibiri, Novosibirsk: 78 – 80; ris. 7 (a), 9 (g). TL: "пос. Шурмак" [Shurmak, Tuva]. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          shurmaki Korshunov, 1988 (Oeneis). D: TL.

 

sibirica Kurentzov, 1970 (Oeneis). Bulavousye cheshuekrylye Dalnego Vostoka SSSR, LeningraD: 70 – 71; ris. 70 (1), 71 (1) (genitalia very poor figured). TL: “внутренние районы Якутии и Магаданской области” [the inner regions of Yakutia and Magadan region]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of jutta.

·            sibirica Kurentzov, 1970 (Oeneis). D: Middle and southern part of Far East; Ussuri region; Amur region; Transbaikal.

 

solanikovi Kurentzov, 1970 (Oeneis). Bulavousye cheshuekrylye Dalnego Vostoka SSSR, LeningraD: 46, 69; ris. 37 (2), 67 (1). TL: "в лиственничных лесах хребта Хангая" [in forests from Laryx sibirica of the Khangai Mts.]. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          solanikovi Kurentzov, 1970 (Oeneis). D: TL.

 

tatarinovi Korb, 1998 (Oeneis). Alexanor, Paris, 20: 308; fig. 18, 19. TL: “partie polaire des monts Ourals” [Polarny Ural loc.]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of ammon. Specific status by: Korshunov & Nikolaev, 2002: 157.

·            tatarinovi Korb, 1998 (Oeneis). D: Polar Ural; Taymyr; Sayan Mts.?

 

 

taygete Geyer, 1830 (Oeneis). Sammlung exotischer Schmetterlinge, Augsburg, 2: Taf. 123; Fig. 15. TL: “Labrador”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          fordi dos Passos, 1949 (Oeneis). American Museum Novitates, 1389: 48. TL: Kuskoquim river, Alaska. Had been originally described as a subspecies of taygete. D: Chukotka.

 

tschukotkensis Kurentzov, 1970 (Oeneis). Bulavousye cheshuekrylye Dalnego Vostoka SSSR, LeningraD: 74. TL: "в горных тундрах Чукотки (Чяплинские ключи)" [in the mountainous tundra of Chukotka (Chaplinskije Kljuchi)] – by the lectotype (Korb, 1998 b: 308). Had been originally described as a subspecies of simulans.

·          tshukotkensis Kurentzov, 1970 (Oeneis). D: Chukotka.

Remark. The specific rank by Tuzov, 1995: 108.

 

 

Subgenus Protoeneis Gorbunov, 2001

The butterflies of Russia: classification, genitalia, keys for identification. Ekatherinburg: Thesis press: 228. TS: Chionobas nanna Ménétriès, 1859.

 

anna Austaut, 1911 (Oeneis). Entomologische Zeitschrift, Stuttgart, 24: 243. TL: “Arasagun-Gol”, East Sayan. Had been originally described as a variety of nanna.

·          anna Austaut, 1911 (Oeneis). D: Sayan.

·          burjatica Korshunov & Nikolaev, 2002 (Oeneis). Butterflies of North Asia. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press: 319. TL: “Бурятия, 50 км к Ю от Улан-Удэ” [Buratia, 50 km S of Ulan-Ude]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of anna. D: Buratia.

·          dzhulunkuli  Korshunov, 1998 (Oeneis). Novye opisanija i utochnenija dlja knigi Dnevnye babochki asiatskoj chasti Rossii, Novosibirsk: 27. TL: "г. Табошак, Курайскийхр." [Taboshak Mt., Kuraisky Mts.]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of anna. D: SE Altai.

 

brunchilda A.Bang-Haas, 1912 (Oeneis). Deutsche entomologische Zeitschrift Iris, 26: 105; Taf. 6, Fig. 1. TL: Sayan, “Arsyn”, “Arasagun-gol” – by the syntypes (Lukhtanov & Lukhtanov, 1994: 138). Had been originally described as a good species.

·       brunchilda A.Bang-Haas, 1912 (Oeneis). D: South Tuva; East Sayan; Central Altai.

 

diluta V.Lukhtanov in Lukhtanov & Lukhtanov, 1994 (Oeneis). Herbipoliana, Marktleuthen, 3: 138 – 139; Taf. 25, Fig. 5. TL: “Sьdsibirien, Tuva, Ujukski-Gebirge, Susch, 850 m”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·       diluta V.Lukhtanov in Lukhtanov & Lukhtanov, 1994 (Oeneis). D: TL.

 

dzhugdzhuri Sheljuzhko, 1929 (Oeneis).  Mitteilungen der Münchener entomologischen Gesellschaft, 19: 349 – 350. TL: Dzhalinda river. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          dzhugdzhuri Sheljuzhko, 1929 (Oeneis). D: East Yakutia.

 

jakutski Korshunov, 1998 (Oeneis). Novye opisanija i utochnenija dlja knigi Dnevnye babochki asiatskoj chasti Rossii, Novosibirsk: 27. TL: "Якутск, ботсад" [Yakutsk, botanic garden]. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          jakutski Korshunov, 1998 (Oeneis). D: TL.

 

nanna Ménétriès in Schrenck, 1859 (Chionobas). Reisen und Forschungen im Amur-Lande, Sankt-Petersburg, 2 (1): 38; Tab. 3, fig. 5. TL: "Amour". Had been originally described as a good species.

·          nanna Ménétriès in Schrenck, 1859 (Chionobas). D: Amur region; possible in the northern part of Ussuri region.

 

pseudosculda Korshunov, 1977 (Oeneis). Nasekomye Mongolii, Leningrad, 5: 662; ris. 1. TL: "Монголия, Центральный аймак, ур. Судзуктэ" [Mongolia, Ctntral ajmak, Sudzukte valley]. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          pseudosculda Korshunov, 1977 (Oeneis). D: East Transbaikal, Verkhny Bukukun river valley.

 

sculda Eversmann, 1851 (Hipparchia). Bulletin de la Societe impériale de Moscou, 24: 612. TL: "les environs de Kiachta". Had been originally described as a good species.

·          sculda Eversmann, 1851 (Hipparchia). D: East Siberia; Altai; Sayan; Tuva; South Transbaikal; Praebaikal; Zea basin.

·          vadimi Korshunov in Korshunov & Gorbunov, 1995 (Oeneis).  Dnevnye babochki asiatskoj chasti Rossii, Ekaterinburg: 138. TL: "Верхнеангарскийхр., окр. г. Северобайкальска" [Verkhneangarsky Mts., Severobajkalsk vicinity]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of sculda. D: North Transbaikal.

 

tarpeia Pallas, 1771 (Papilio). Reisen durch verschieden Provinzen des Russischen Reiches in den Jahren 1768 – 1774, Sankt-Petersburg, 1: 18. TL: Volga region. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          grossi Eitschberger & Lukhtanov, 1994 (Oeneis). Atalanta, Würzburg, 25: 164 – 165; Farbtaf. 5a, Abbn. 1 – 3. TL: "Südsibirien, Buratien, 20 km NW Selenduma, 600 m". Had been originally described as a subspecies of tarpeia. D: Buratia, Altai, Transbaikal, Praebaikal, Tuva.

·          lederi Alphéraky, 1897 (Oeneis). Mémoires sur les Lépidoptères, Saint-Pétersbourg, 9: 281. TL: "Urga" – by the lectotype (Eitschberger & Lukhtanov, 1994: 163). Had been originally described as a variety of tarpeia. D: Transbaikal.

·          rozhdestvenskyi Korb & Yakovlev, 1997 (Oeneis). Zoosystematica Rossica, Sankt-Petersburg, 5: 313 – 314. TL: "Russia, Altai Terr., Shtabka". Had been originally described as a subspecies of tarpeia. D: Altai Territory.

·          tarpeia Pallas, 1771 (Papilio). D: South Russia; South Ural; Caucasus; West Siberia.

·          ukokana Korb, 1998 (Oeneis). Alexanor, 20: 144 – 145; Abbn. 1 – 3. TL: "Südaltai, Ukok, Dschasator, 1 700 m". Had been originally described as a subspecies of tarpeia. D: South-West Altai, Ukok plateau.

 

urda Eversmann, 1847 (Hipparchia). Bulletin de la Société impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou, 20 (3): 69; Tab. 2, fig. 1 – 4. TL: "Dauria". Had been originally described as a good species.

·          urda Eversmann, 1847 (Hipparchia). D: Altai; Tuva; Transbaikal; Praebaikal; Sayan; Amur region, Ussuri region.

 

Tribus Satyrini Boisduval, [1833]

 

Skand. Dagfjär., Malmö: 9, 30. TS: Papilio hyperantus Linnaeus, 1758.

 

hyperantus Linnaeus, 1758 (Papilio). Systema Naturae… (ed. 10), 1: 471. TL: Sweden. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          hyperantus Linnaeus, 1758 (Papilio). D: European part; Caucasus; Transcaucasus; Ural; West Siberia.

·          insularius Kurentzov, 1966 (Aphantopus). Novye vidy fauny Sibiri i prilegajustshikh regionov, Novosibirsk: 36 – 38; ris. 5 a. TL: "нао. Фуругельмавзал. ПетраВеликого" [Furugelma island]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of hyperantus. D: TL.

·          ocellatus Butler, 1882 (Epinephele).  Annales of the Magazin of the natural History, (5) 9: 14. TL: “Posiette Bay” in Ussuri region. Had been originally described as a variety of hyperanthus. D: Amur district; Ussuri district.

·          sibiricus Obraztsov, 1936 (Aphantopus). Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstage  von Prof. Dr. Embrik Strand, Riga, 60 (2): 242. TL: Irkutsk. Had been originally described as a variety of hyperantus. D: Siberia.

 

Die Groβschmetterlinge der Erde, Stuttgart, 9: 307. TS: Papilio proserpina [Denis & Schiffermüller], [1775].

 

circe Fabricius, 1775 (Papilio). Systema Entomologicae, sistens insectorum classes, ordines, genera, species, adiectis synonymis, locis descriptionibus, observationibus, Flensenburgi; Lipsiae: 495. TL: Europa. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          circe Fabricius, 1775 (Papilio). D: Southern part of European ex-USSR; Crimea; Caucasus; Transcaucasus.

 

Lepidoptera Indica, Madras, 2 (14): 42. TS: Hipparchia digna Marshall, 1883.

 

stheno Grum-Grshimailo, 1887 (Satyrus). Mémoires sur les Lépidoptères, Saint-Pétersbourg, 3: 401. TL: Pamir.

·          stheno Grum-Grshimailo, 1887 (Satyrus). D: South Pamir.

 

Revue française de Lépidopterologie, Paris, 13: 40. TS: Papilio arethusa [Denis & Schiffermüller], [1775].

 

arethusa [Denis & Schiffermüller], [1775] (Papilio). Ankündung eines systematischen Werkes von den Schmetterlinge der Wienergegend, Wien: 169. TL: Vienna. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          arethusa [Denis & Schiffermüller], [1775] (Papilio). D: Central and South European part; Kazakhstan; Caucasus; Transcaucasus; Tian Shan; South Altai; South Ural.

 

Magazin für Insektenkunde, 6: 281. TS: Papilio hermione Linné, 1764.

 

Subgenus Hipparchia sensu stricto

 

alcyone [Denis & Schiffermüller], [1775] (Papilio). Ankündung eines systematischen Werkes der Schmetterlinge der Wienergegend, Wien: 169. TL: Vienna. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          alcione [Denis & Schiffermüller], [1775] (Papilio). D: West and south of European part; Caucasus.

 

autonoe Esper, [1783] (Papilio). Die Schmetterlinge in Abbildungen nach der Natur mit Beschreibungen, Erlangen, 1 (2): 167; Taf. 86, fig. 1 – 3. TL: Russia. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          autonoe Esper, [1783] (Papilio). D: steppes of southern Russia of European part, Tian Shan.

·          sibirica Staudinger, 1861 (Satyrus). Catalog der Lepidopteren des europäischen Faunengebiet, Berlin: 12. TL: [Siberia]. Had been described as a variety of autonoe. D: South Siberia, Amur region.

 

fagi Scopoli, 1763 (Papilio). Entomologia carniotica exhibens Insecta Carnioliae indigena et distributa in ordines, genera, species, varietates. Methodo Linneana. Vindobonae: 152. TL: Yugoslavia, Krain. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          fagi Scopoli, 1763 (Papilio). D: Crimea; Caucasus.

·          tetrica Fruhstorfer, 1907 (Satyrus). Internationale entomologische Zeitschrift, Guben, 1: 208. TL: Volgograd. Had been originally described as a subspecies of hermione. D: Volga region; South Ural; West Kazakhstan.

 

syriaca Staudinger, 1871 (Satyrus). Catalog der Lepidopteren des europaeischen Faunengebietes, Dresden, 2: 27. TL: Syria (Nekrutenko, 1990: 164). Had been originally described as a subspecies of hermione.

·          meschetica Jachontov, 1915 (Satyrus). Izvestia Moskovskogo entomologicheskogo obstshestva, Moscow, 1: 52. TL: "Закавказье, Боржом" [Transcaucasus, Borzhom]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of hermione. D: Caucasus; Transcaucasus.

 

Subgenus Parachipparchia Kudrna, 1977.

A revision of the genus Hipparchia Fabricius, Farington; Oxon: 12. TS: Papilio semele Linnaeus, 1758.

 

pellucida Stauder, 1923 (Satyrus). Mitteilungen der Münchener entomologischen Gesellschaft, 13: 64. TL: Terter, Transcaucasus. Had been originally described as a subspecies of semele.

·          cotys Jachontov, 1935 (Satyrus). Nashi dnevnye babochki, Moscow: 139; ris. 42 B. TL: "penins. Taurica (Jalta, Aj-Todor), Transcaucasica (Borzhom, Mzchet, Kagyzman, Agri-Dagh montes)". Had been originally described as a subspecies of semele. D: Crimea.

·          pellucida Stauder, 1923 (Satyrus). D: Caucasus; Transcaucasus.

 

semele Linnaeus, 1758 (Papilio). Systema Naturae... (ed. 10), 1: TL: Sweden. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          semele Linnaeus, 1758 (Papilio). D: Middle zone of Western European part (Ukraina) (Coutsis, 1984: 166).

 

volgensis Mazochin-Porshnjakov, 1952 (Satyrus). Zoological Journal, Moscow, 31: 288. TL: "около Сталинграда (Найденовская и Совхозная балки) и Красноармейска (Чепурниковская балка) и в Тингутинском лесничестве (55 км южнее Сталинграда)" [near Stalingrad (Najdenovskaja Balka, Sovkhoznaja Balka) and Krasnoarmejsk (Chepurnikovskaja Balka) and in Tingutinskoje Lesnichestvo]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of semele.

·          volgensis Mazochin-Porshnjakov, 1952 (Satyrus). D: Volga region.

 

Subgenus Neohipparchia de Lesse, 1951.

Revue française de Lépidopterologie, Paris, 13: 40. TS: Papilio statilinus Hufnagel, 1766.

 

dagi Korshunov & Krasilnikova in Korshunov, 1990 (Hipparchia). Redkie gelminty, klestshi i nasekomye, Novosibirsk: 70 – 73; ris. 1, 2. TL: "Туркмения, Бахарденский р-н, ущелье Ипай-Кала, вдоль речки" [Turkmenia, Bakhardinsk district, Ipay-Kala valley, along a river]. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          dagi Korshunov & Krasilnikova in Korshunov, 1990 (Hipparchia). D: TL.

 

fatua Freyer, 1844 (Papilio). Neue Beiträge zur Schmetterlingskunde mit Abbildungen nach der Natur, Augsburg, 5: 54; Tab. 415, Fig. 3, 4. TL: West Turkey, Kütakhja, Gedis (Kudrna, 1977: 132). Had been originally described as a good species.

·          fatua Freyer, 1844 (Papilio). D: Kopet-Dagh Mts.; Armenia

 

parisatis Kollar in Kollar & Redtenbacher, 1849 (Satyrus). Ueber den Charakter der Insekten-Fauna von Südpersien, Vienna: 11. TL: South Persia. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          macrophtalma Eversmann, 1851 (Hipparchia, Satyrus). Bulletin de la Société impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou, 24: 615. TL: "Armenia" – by the lectotype ((Nekrutenko, 1990: 170). Had been originally described as a good species. D: Transcaucasus; Middle Asia; South-West Kazakhstan.

 

statilinus Hufnagel, 1766 (Papilio). Berliner Magazin, 2: 84. TL: Berlin. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          martiana Nordmann, 1851 (Satyrus). Bulletin de la Société impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou, 24: 408. TL: Crimea. Had been originally described as a variety of statilinus. D: Crimea.

·          statilinus Hufnagel, 1766 (Papilio). D: South European part (to Volga region); Caucasus; Transcaucasus.

 

Verzeichniss bekannter Schmett[er]linge, Augsburg, (4): 57. TS: Papilio dryas Scopoli, 1763.

 

dryas Scopoli, 1763 (Papilio). Entomologia carniolica exhibens Insecta Carnioliae indigena et distributa in ordines, genera, species, varietates. Methodo Linneana, Vindobonae: 153. TL: Yugoslavia, Krain. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          bipunctatus Motschulsky, 1860 (Satyrus). Études d’Entomologie, 9: 29. TL: Japan, Hokkaido. Had been originally described as a variety of phaedra. D: Sakhalin; Ussuri district.

·          dryas Scopoli, 1763 (Papilio). D: European part (without north); Crimea; Caucasus; Transcaucasus.

·          kurilensis Matsumura, 1928 (Satyrus). Insecta Masumurasca, Sapporo, 2 (4): 191, 197. TL: Kunashir, Tobutsu. Had been originally described as a subspecies of dryas. D: Kuril islands (south).

·          septentrionalis Wnukowsky, 1929 (Satyrus). Zoologische Anzeiger, 83: 221. TL: “Kentei-Mts.”. [nom. nov. pro Satyrus dryas sibirica Staudinger, 1871, nom. praeocc. pro Satyrus autonoe sibirica Staudinger, 1861]. D: South Siberian mountains; Amur region; Tian Shan.

 

Consid. général des Animals: Crustacea, Arachnes, Insecta: 355, 440. TS: Papilio actaea Esper, [1780].

 

amasinus Staudinger, 1861 (Satyrus). Catalog der Lepidopteren des europaeischen Faunengebietes, Berlin: 13. TL: Amasia, Turkey – by the lectotype designation (Nekrutenko, 1990: 158). Had been originally described as a variety of actaea.

·amasinus Staudinger, 1861 (Satyrus). D: Armenia.

 

cordulina Lang, 1884 (Satyrus). Rhopalocera Europae descripta et delineata. The butterflies of Europe described and figured, London, 1: 325. TL: Europe. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          alaica Staudinger, 1886 (Satyrus).  Stettiner entomologische Zeitschrift, 47: 65. TL: "Südlichen Alai". Had been originally described as a D: Alai; North Pamir; West Pamir; South Tian Shan.

·          cordulina Lang, 1884 (Satyrus). D: European part (south): Kazakhstan; North Tian Shan.

 

daubi Gross & Ebert, 1975 (Satyrus). Joutnal of the entomological Society of Iran, Teheran, Suppl. 1: 31. TL: Iran, Elburs. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          daubi Gross & Ebert, 1975 (Satyrus).  D: Kopet Dagh.

 

effendi Nekrutenko, 1989 (Satyrus). Vestnik zoologii, Kiev, 1989 (1): 14; ris. 1. TL: "Пазмара Ордубадского р-на Нахичеванской АССР, Зангезурский хребет, 2500 – 3000 м" [Pazmara in Ordubad district of Nakhichevan ASSR, Zangezur Mts., 2500 – 3000 m]. Had been originally described as a  good species.

·          effendi Nekrutenko, 1989 (Satyrus). D: Zangezur Mts.

 

ferula Fabricius, 1793 (Papilio). Entomologia systematica emendata et aucta. Secundum classes, ordines, genera, species adiectis synonymis locis observationibus, descriptionibus, Hafniae, 3: 225. TL: Italy. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          altaica Grum-Grshimailo, 1893 (Satyrus). Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, Sankt-Petersburg, 27: 384. TL: "in montibus Altaicis". Had been originally described as a variety of cordula Fabricius, 1793. D: Dzhungaria; Tarbagatai; Saur; Kazakhstan (south-east); Altai.

·          ferula Fabricius, 1793 (Papilio). D: South of European part; Caucasus; Small Caucasus.

·          medvedevi Korshunov, 1996 (Satyrus). Dopolnenija i ispravlenija k knige Dnevnye babochki asiatskoj chasti Rossii, Novosibirsk: 37. TL: "Тува, Морэн" [Tuva, Moren]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of ferula. D: Tuva; Praebaikal; Sayan.

·          sergeevi Dubatolov & Streltzov, 1999 (Satyrus). Atalanta, Würzburg, 30 (1/4): 125 – 128, col. pl. 9a. Type locality: Amur region, Blagovestshensk. Had been originally described as a subspecies of ferula. D: Amur region.

 

iranicus Schwingenschuss, 1939 (Satyrus). Entomologische Zeitschrift, Frankfurt am Main, 53: 38. TL: "im Tarseegebiet, bei Rehne und am Demavend bis 2800 m". Had been originally described as a subspecies of semele.

·          iranicus Schweigenschuss, 1939 (Satyrus). D: Transcaucasus: Talysh, Zuvand.

 

nana Staudinger, 1886 (Satyrus). Stettiner entomologische Zeitschrift, 47: 65. TL: Askhabad. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          nana Staudinger, 1886 (Satyrus). D: Kopet Dagh.

 

orphei Ju.Ju.Stshetkin, 1985 (Satyrus). Revue d'Entomologie de l'URSS, Léningrad, 64: 584 – 587; ris. 1, 2. TL: "восточная часть хребта Петра Первого, в районе кишлака Мук, 2620 м" [the eastern part of Peter the Great Mts, kishlak Muk vicinity, 2620 m]. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          orphei Ju.Ju.Stshetkin, 1985 (Satyrus). D: Peter the Great Mts.; Transalai Mts. (western part); Gissar Mts. (southern slope); Darvaz.

 

parthica Lederer, 1870 (Satyrus). Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, Sankt-Petersburg, 6: 83; Taf. 4, Fig. 12, 13. TL: "Astrabad" – by the lectotype (Nekrutenko, 1989: 14). Had been originally described as a variety of bryce [Hübner], [1790].

·          parthica Lederer, 1870 (Satyrus). D: Kopet Dagh.

 

shachdara Ju.Ju.Stshetkin, 1986 (Satyrus). Bulleten moskovskogo obstshestva ispytatelej prirody, Otdel biologicheskikh nauk, Moscow, 91 (3): 69 – 70; ris. 3. TL: "Шугнанский хребет, окрестности Хорогского ботсада, 2350 м, каменистый склон" [Shugnan Mts., Khorog botanic garden vicinity, 2350 m, stone slope]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of pimpla.

·          shachdara Ju.Ju.Stshetkin, 1986 (Satyrus). D: South-West Pamir.

 

stulta Staudinger, 1882 (Satyrus). Berliner entomologische Zeitschrift, 26: 175 – 176. TL: "in der Umgegend von Samarkand". Had been originally described as a good species.

·          stulta Staudinger, 1882 (Satyrus). D: Alai.

 

virbius Herrich-Schäffer, 1843 (Satyrus). Systematische Bearbeitung der Schmetterlinge von Europa, zugleich als Text, Revision und Supplement von Jakob Hübner's Sammlung europäischer Schmetterlinge. Umrisstafeln mit Erklärung. Systema Lepidopterorum. Index alphabetico-synonimicus ad vol. I – V. Index universalis specierum et generum.Regensburg, 1: 79; Fig. 45 – 48. TL: South Russia. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          virbius Herrich-Schäffer, 1843 (Satyrus). D: South European part; Crimea?! (Tuzov, 1993: 38).

 

Lepidoptera Indica, Madras, 2 (14): 38. TS: Satyrus huebneri C. & R. Felder, [1867].

 

abramovi Erschoff, 1884 (Satyrus). Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, Sankt-Petersburg, 18: 245. TL: Chatyr-Kul lake. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          abramovi Erschoff, 1884 (Satyrus). D: region of Chatyr-Kul lake and At-Bashi mountain ridge.

·          naryna Avinoff & Sweadner, 1951 (Karanasa). Annales of the Carnegue Museum, 32: 113. TL: “Naryn”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of abramovi. D: Interior Tian Shan; Alai Mts.; Terskey Ala-Too Mts.

·          regula Staudinger, 1887 (Satyrus).  Stettiner entomologische Zeitschrift, 48: 59. TL: "Transalai". D: Transalai Mts.

·          ssp? D: Kirghiz Mts.

 

alpherakyi Avinov, 1910 (Satyrus). Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, Sankt-Petersburg, 39 (5): 240 – 241; Tab. 14, fig. 13 – 15. TL: "въ горахъ около Памирскаго поста" [in the mountains near Pamirsky post] [Pamirsky Post is Murgab now]. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          alpherakyi Avinov, 1910 (Satyrus). D: East Pamir.

·          kafir Avinoff & Sweadner, 1951 (Karanasa). Annales of the Carnegue Museum, 32: 121 –122; pl. 6, figs. 18 – 22, pl. 10, fig.41, pl. 11, fig. 27, pl. 13. TL: “Nuksan Pass, Hindu-Kush, Kafirstan”. Had been originally described as a good species. D: West Pamir.

 

ansobica Ju.Ju.Stshetkin, 1986 (Karanasa). Zoological Journal, Moscow, 65: 804 – 806; ris. 1, 2. TL: "Гиссарский хребет, перевал Анзоб, 3400 м над ур.м." [Gissar Mts., Anzob pass, 3400 m]. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          ansobica Ju.Ju.Stshetkin, 1986 (Karanasa). D: TL.

 

bolorica Grum-Grshimailo, 1888 (Satyrus). Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, Sankt-Petersburg, 22: 307. TL: "Hindukush orient". Had been originally described as a good species.

·          bolorica Grum-Grshimailo, 1888 (Satyrus). D: East Pamir.

·          chitralica Tytler, 1926 (Satyrus). Journal of Bombay natural History Society, 31: 254. TL: "Chitral". Had been originally described as a subspecies of regeli. D: West Pamir.

·          hodja Avinoff & Sweadner, 1951 (Karanasa). Annales of the Carnegue Museum, 32: 52 – 53. TL: “Chodja Mahomed”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of bolorica. D: Central Pamir.

 

decolorata Staudinger, 1901 (Satyrus). Catalog der Lepidopteren des palaearktischen Faunengebietes, Berlin, 1: 56. TL: “Samarkand”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          decolorata Staudinger, 1901 (Satyrus). D: Gissar.

·          muschketovi Avinoff & Sweadner, 1951 (Karanasa). Annales of the Carnegue Museum, 32: 55 – 56. TL: “Muzkulak, South central Pamir”. D: West Pamir (only central part).

 

grumi Avinoff & Sweadner, 1951 (Karanasa). Annales of the Carnegue Museum, 32: 53 – 55. TL: "Visharvi Pass, Darwas". Had been originally described as a good species.

·          grumi Avinoff & Sweadner, 1951 (Karanasa). D: Western part of Yuzhno-Alichursky Mts.

 

hoffmanni Christoph, 1893 (Satyrus). Stettiner entomologische Zeitschrift, 54: 32. TL: Samarkand. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          hoffmanni Christoph, 1893 (Satyrus). D: Turkestansky Mts.

 

incerta Bogdanov, 1998 (Karanasa). A guide to butterflies of Russia and adjacent territories, Sofia, 1: 249; pl. 72; fig. 6 – 8. TL: “Pamirs, Shugnansky Mts., Dzhilandy, 4,000 m a.s.l.” Had been originally described as a good species.

·          incerta Bogdanov, 1998 (Karanasa). D: Darvaz.

 

intermedia Grum-Grshimaïlo, 1890 (Satyrus). Mémoires sur les Lépidoptères, Saint-Pétersbourg, 4: 173. TL: "Ters Agar Pass, Transalai". Had been originally described as a good species.

·          intermedia Grum-Grshimaïlo, 1890 (Satyrus). D: Transalai Mts.

 

josephi Staudinger, 1882 (Satyrus). Berliner entomologische Zeitschrift, 26: 174 – 175. TL: "aus der Prov. Fergana… auf dem Alai-Gebirge". Had been originally described as a variety of huebneri.

·          darvasica Avinoff & Sweadner, 1951 (Karanasa). Annales of the Carnegue Museum, 32: 72 – 73. TL: “Visharvi”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of josephi. D: Darvaz Mts.

·          dissoluta Staudinger, 1886 (Satyrus). Stettiner entomologische Zeitschrift, 47: 230. TL: "Usgent und Osch". Had been originally described as a variety of huebneri. D: Transalai and Beleuli Mts.

·          erubescens Avinoff & Sweadner, 1951 (Karanasa). Annales of the Carnegue Museum, 32: 87. TL: “Gursy Tash, west Central Pamir”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of josephi. D: Peter the Great Mts.

·          hissariensis Avinoff & Sweadner, 1951 (Karanasa). Annales of the Carnegue Museum, 32: 64 – 65. TL: “Hissar”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of josephi. D: Gissar Mts.

·          jacobsoni Avinoff & Sweadner, 1951 (Karanasa). Annales of the Carnegue Museum, 32: 88. TL: “Kaindy”, “western Pamir”. Had been originally described as a good species. D: Kichik-Alai Mts.

·          josephi Staudinger, 1882 (Satyrus). D: Alai Mts.

·          kasak Avinoff & Sweadner, 1951 (Karanasa). Annales of the Carnegue Museum, 32: 278; pl. 4, fig. 20. TL: "Targaisk, Kandyktau, Kasakstan, 1400 m". Had been originally described as a good species. D: Kandyktau Mts.

 

kasakstana O.Bang-Haas, 1936 (Satyrus). Entomologische Zeitschrift, Frankfurt am Main, 50: 108. TL: "Kasakstan, Aulie Ata, Talas Alatau". Had been originally described as a subspecies of regeli.

·          kasakstana O.Bang-Haas, 1936 (Satyrus). D: West Tian Shan.

 

kirgizorum Avinoff & Sweadner, 1951 (Karanasa). Annales of the Carnegue Museum, 32: 84; pl. 4, fig. 20; pl. 9, fig. 25; pl. 14. TL: Kirghiz Mts. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          kirgizorum Avinoff & Sweadner, 1951 (Karanasa). D: Kirghiz Mts. (central and eastern part).

 

latefasciata Grum-Grshimailo, 1902 (Satyrus). Annales Musei Zoologici, Sankt-Petersburg, 7: 193. TL: "Tian-schan centrali, Sarydshass". Had been originally described as a variety of regeli.

·          latefasciata Grum-Grshimailo, 1902 (Satyrus). D: Inner Tian Shan.

·          obscurior Avinoff & Sweadner, 1951 (Karanasa). Annales of the Carnegue Museum, 32: 97; pl. 5, fig. 19, 24; pl. 10, fig. 11, 12. TL: mountains eastern of Issyk Kul. Had been originally described as a good species. D: North Tian Shan.

 

leechi Grum-Grshimaïlo, 1890 (Satyrus). Mémoires sur les Lépidoptères, Saint-Pétersbourg, 4: 473 – 475; Tab. 15, fig. 3. TL: "meridionales des monts Kounjout". Had been originally described as a good species.

Remark. V.V.Tshikolovets in his book (1997: 92 – 94) gives taxa centralis and leechi as different species without good basics. But in figures which give this specialist both taxa can be distinguished only in some charakters of wing colouration (leechi lighter than centralis), in pattern both taxa are not differ. This author do not give illustrations on subject of male genitalia and don’t give the differences based on male genitalic structures. So I place both taxa in one species with oldest name leechi.

·          alichura Avinoff & Sweadner, 1951 (Karanasa). Annales of the Carnegue Museum, 32: 88. TL: “Alitchur”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of leechi. D: North Alichur Mts.; South Alichur Mts.

·          centralis Avinoff & Sweadner, 1951 (Karanasa). Annales of the Carnegue Museum, 32: 89 – 90. TL: “Pamir Post”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of leechi. D: Northern part of East Pamir.

·          leechi Grum-Grshimaïlo, 1890 (Satyrus). D: Southern part of East Pamir.

 

maureri Avinoff & Sweadner, 1951 (Karanasa). Annales of the Carnegue Museum, 32: 61 – 62. TL: “Bukhara”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          iskander Avinoff & Sweadner, 1951 (Karanasa). Annales of the Carnegue Museum, 32: 62 – 64. TL: “Hasret Sultan”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of maureri. D: East Gissar.

·          maureri Avinoff & Sweadner, 1951 (Karanasa). D: West Gissar.

 

moorei Evans, 1912 (Satyrus). Journal of the Bombay natural History Society, 21 (2): 563. TL: “Chitral”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of huebneri (original combination: Satyrus (Karanasa) hübneri, Fd. moorei, Ev.).

·           dubia Avinoff & Sweadner, 1951 (Karanasa) Annales of the Carnegie Museum, 32 (1): 127 – 129; pl. 3, figs. 7, 9, 10, pl. 9, figs. 12, 13, 22, 23, pl. 11, fig. 22, pls. 13, 16. TL: “Baroghil Pass 3800 m”. Had been originally described as a good species. D: Western part of Vakhansky Mts.

 

pamira Staudinger, 1887 (Satyrus). Stettiner entomologische Zeitschrift, 48: 231. TL: "Transalai". Had been originally described as a good species.

·          holbecki Avinoff & Sweadner, 1951 (Karanasa). Annales of the Carnegue Museum, 32: 118. TL: "Gushkon Pass, Darwas". Had been originally described as a subspecies of pamira. D: Weast Pamir; East Darwaz.

·          ornata Avinoff & Sweadner, 1951 (Karanasa). Annales of the Carnegue Museum, 32: 117. TL: “Gury Tash”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of pamira. D: West Darwaz.

·          pamira Staudinger, 1887 (Satyrus). D: Transalai Mts.; Akademii Nauk Mts.; Beleuli Mts.

 

praestans Avinov & Sweadner, 1951 (Karanasa). Annales of the Carnegue Museum, 32: 77 – 78; pl. 9, fig. 40. TL: “Aulie-Ata, Syr Daria”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          praestans Avinov & Sweadner, 1951 (Karanasa).  D: Kirghiz Mts. (western part); Suusamyrtoo Mts.

 

pungeleri Bang-Haas, 1910 (Satyrus). Deutsche entomologische Zeitschrift Iris, 24: 43. TL: “Naryn”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          pungeleri Bang-Haas, 1910 (Satyrus). D: Inner Tian Shan.

 

regeli Alphéraky, 1881 (Satyrus). Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, Sankt-Petersburg, 16: 419; Tab. 15, fig. 23. TL: "Kouldjà". Had been originally described as a good species.

·          regeli Alphéraky, 1881 (Satyrus). D: North Tian Shan; Inner Tian Shan.

·          ruchbeili Avinoff & Sweadner, 1951 (Karanasa). Annales of the Carnegue Museum, 32: 100; pl. 5, fig. 15, 23; pl. 8, fig. 3; pl. 10, fig. 21, 23; pl. 11, fig. 20. TL: "Western end of the Boro-Choro Mountains, north of the Russian city of Djarkent". Had been originally described as a good species. D: Dzhungaria; Ketmen Mts.

 

straminea Bogdanov, 1998 (Karanasa). A guide to butterflies of Russia and adjacent territories, Sofia, 1: 251; pl. 72; fig. 4 – 6. TL: “Pamirs, Vanchsky Mts., Gudzhovast River, 3,500 m a.s.l.”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          straminea Bogdanov, 1998 (Karanasa). D: Inner Tian Shan.

 

talastauana O.Bang-Haas, 1927 (Satyrus). Horae Macrolepidopterologicae regionis palaearcticae, Drezden, 1: 49; Taf. 7, fig. 20. TL: "Aulie-Ata". Had been originally described as a subspecies of huebneri.

·          angrena Avinoff & Sweadner, 1951 (Karanasa). Annales of the Carnegue Museum, 32: 74 – 75. TL: “Angren”. Had been originally described as a good species.D: Angren plateau in West Tian Shan.

·          arasana Avinoff & Sweadner, 1951 (Karanasa). Annales of the Carnegue Museum, 32: 75. TL: “Arasan Bulak. Had been originally described as a good species. D: Chatkalsky Mts.

·          talastauana O.Bang-Haas, 1927 (Satyrus). D: Talassky Mts.

 

wilkinsi Erschoff, 1881 (Satyrus). Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, Sankt-Petersburg, 18: 244. TL: "in Semiretschie ad lacum Tschatir-Kul (9000’) mense juno medie et prope Utsch-Tasch in Kaschgar septentrionali". Had been originally described as a good species.

·            dublitzkyi Bang-Haas, 1927 (Satyrus). Horae Macrolepidopterologicae regionis palaearcticae, Dresden, 1: 49; Tab. 7, fig. 13. TL: Kumbel Mt., Transili Alatau. Had been originally described as a variety of huebneri. D: North Tian Shan.

·            durana Avinoff & Sweadner, 1951 (Karanasa). Annales of the Carnegue Museum, 32: 83 – 84. TL: “Dura Pass, southwest of Lake Issyk Kul”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of wilkinsi. D: Inner Tian Shan.

·            robusta Avinov & Sweadner, 1951 (Karanasa). Annales of the Carnegue Museum, 32: 82. TL: “Taldyk Pass”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of wilkinsi. D: Alai.

·            wilkinsi Erschoff, 1881 (Satyrus). D: Baubashata Mts.; At-Bashi Mts.

 

Lepidoptera Indica, Madras, 2: 21. TS: Papilio briseis Linné, 1764.

 

anthe Hoffmannsegg, 1804 (Papilio). Magazin für Insektenkunde, 3: 181. TL: “Südrussland”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          anthe Hoffmannsegg, 1804 (Papilio). D: South of European part.

 

bischoffi Herrich-Schäffer, [1851] (Satyrus). Systematische Bearbeitung der Schmetterlinge von Europa, zugleich als Text, Revision und Supplement zu Jakob Hübner's Sammlung europäischer Schmetterlinge. Umrisstafeln mit Erklärung. Nachträge. Systema Lepidopterorum. Index alphabetico-synonymicus ad Vol. I – V. Index universalis specierum et generum, Regensburg, 6: 12. TL: "восточное побережье оз. Урмия, Дашгезан, Ирин" [eastern sea coast of Urmia lake, Dashgezan, Irin] (Nekrutenko, 1990: 177). Had been originally described as a good species.

·          bischoffi Herrich-Schäffer, [1851] (Satyrus). D: South Armenia; Nakhichevan region; Talysh: Zuvand; Apsheron peninsula; Kobystan.

 

briseis Linné, 1764 (Papilio). Museum S:ae R:ae M:tis Ludovicae Ulricae Reginae Svecorum, Gothorum, Vandalorumque etc. etc. etc. In quo animalia rariora, exotica, imprimis Insecta et Conchilia discribuntur et determinatur, prodromi instar editum, Holmiae: 276. TL: Germany. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          armena Jachontov, 1911 (Satyrus). Revue Russe d'Entomologie, Moscow, 11: 421. TL: "Armenia s.str., ad flumina Araxem et Arsaniam (Euphratem or.) et montem Bingoel-Dagh". Had been originally described as a subspecies of briseis. D: Armenian plateau.

·          briseis Linné, 1764 (Papilio). D: South of European part; South of Siberia; Kazakhstan; Crimea.

·          magna Rühl, 1894 (Satyrus). Die palaearktischen Groβschmetterlinge und ihre Naturgeschichte. Tagfalter, Leipzig, 1: 531. TL: "Armenien, Kouldja-District". Had been originally described as a variety of briseis. D: Caucasus; Transcaucasus.

·          meridionalis Staudinger, 1886 (Satyrus). Stettiner entomologische Zeitschrift, 47: 242. TL: “Südeuropa”. Had been originally described as a variety of briseis. D: South of European part.

·          suusamyra Korb 2005. TL:Suusamyrtoo valley. D: TL.

 

eitschbergeri Lukhtanov, 1999 (Chazara). Atalanta, Würzburg, 30 (1/4): 120 – 122, Abb. 1, Farbtaf. 8, Abbn. 1 – 4. TL: “Kirgisien, Tienschan, Issyk-Kul-Gebiet, Terskey-Alatoo-Kette, Kadzhi-Sai, 1620 m”. Had been originally described as a good species. D: southern slope of Kungey Ala-Too mountain ridge and northern slope of Terskey Ala-Too mountain ridge only in the Issy Kul valley.

 

enervata Staudinger, 1881 (Satyrus). Stettiner entomologische Zeitschrift, 42: 271. TL: "Saisan" – by the lectotype (Lukhtanov & Lukhtanov, 1994: 157). Had been originally described as a variety of anthe.

·          enervata Staudinger, 1881 (Satyrus). D: South Altai; Dzhungaria; all Middle Asia.

 

heydenreichi Lederer, 1853 (Satyrus). Verhandlungen des zoologisch-botanischen Vereins, Wien, 3: 359. TL: "in den Vorbergen des Altai zwischen Ustkamenogorsk und Ustbuchtarminsk am Irtysch". Had been originally described as a good species.

·          heydenreichi Lederer, 1853 (Satyrus). D: South Altai; North Tian Shan.

·          kullmanni Wyatt & Omoto, 1966 (Satyrus). Entomops, Nice, 5: 156 – 157; fig. TL: "Parian, Panjshir V., Hindu-Kush, 2,700 m". Had been originally described as a subspecies of heydenreichi. D: West Pamir.

·          shandura Marschall, 1882 (Satyrus).  Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengalia, 51 (2\3): 38; pl. 4, fig. 3. TL: Shandur. Had been originally described as a good species. D: Gissar; Darvaz; Alai.

·          tapkae Korb, 2005.  nom. nov. pro nana Rühl, 1895 nec nana Staudinger, 1886 (primary homonymy – both taxa originally established in the genus Satyrus). TL: "Tura". Had been originally described as a variety of heydenreichi. D: Innen Tian Shan.

 

kauffmanni Erschoff in Fedtschenko, 1874 (Satyrus). Reise nach Turkestan, Sankt-Petersburg, 2 5 (3) (Lepidoptera): 19; Tab. 1, fig. 14. TL: Samarkand. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          kauffmanni Erschoff in Fedtschenko, 1874 (Satyrus). D: Gissar.

·          obscurior Staudinger, 1887 (Satyrus). Stettiner entomologische Zeitschrift, 48: 57. TL: "Alexander-Gebirge". Had been originally described as a variety of sieversi. D: North Tian Shan; Dzhungaria.

·          sartha Staudinger, 1889 (Satyrus). Stettiner entomologische Zeitschrift, 50: 42. TL: “Transalai”. Had been originally described as a good species.D: Alai.

 

maracandica Staudinger, 1886 (Satyrus). Stettiner entomologische Zeitschrift, 47: 237. TL: “Samarkand”. Had been originally described as a variety of briseis.

·          fergana Staudinger, 1886 (Satyrus). Stettiner entomologische Zeitschrift, 47: 237. Had been originally described as a variety of briseis. D: mountains of Gissar, Alai, Darvaz and West Pamir.

·          maracandica Staudinger, 1886 (Satyrus). D: Deserts of Middle Asia.

 

persephone Hübner, [1805] (Papilio). Sammlung europäischer Schmetterlinge, Augsburg,: Tab. 115, Fig. 589, 590. TL: Not stated [South Europa]. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          persephone Hübner, [1805] (Papilio). D: South of European part; Caucasus; Transcaucasus; Crimea; Kazakhstan; Kopet Dagh.

·          pseudoenervata Lukhtanov, 1999 (Chazara). Atalanta, Würzburg, 30 (1/4): 142 – 143. TL: “Kasachstan, Ust-Kamenogorsk-Gebiet, Süd-Altai, Kurtschum-Gegend, Burabai, 600 m.” Had been originally described as a subspecies of persephone. D: South Altai.

 

rangontavica Ju.Ju.Stshetkin, 1981 (Chazara). Zoological Journal, Moscow, 60: 1889 – 1890; ris. w. TL: "хребет Рангонтау, близ Таш-Мечети, 1400 м над ур. м." [Rangontau Mts. near Tash-Mechet', 1400 m]. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          rangontavica Ju.Ju.Stshetkin, 1981 (Chazara). D: Rangontau Mts.

 

sieversi Christoph, 1885 (Satyrus). Mémoires sur les Lépidoptères, Saint-Pétersbourg, 2: 167. TL: “Achal-Tekke”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          sieversi Christoph, 1885 (Satyrus). D: Kopet Dagh.

 

staudingeri Bang-Haas, 1882 (Satyrus). Berliner entomologische Zeitschrift, 26: 172 – 174. TL: "bei Penjikend (Prov. Samarkand)". Had been originally described as a good species.

·          gultschensis Grum-Grshimailo, 1888 (Satyrus). Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, Sankt-Petersburg, 22: 307. TL: "Gultscha (Montes Alaïenses)". Had been originally described as a variety of staudingeri. D: Inner Tian Shan; East Alai.

·          staudingeri Bang-Haas, 1882 (Satyrus). D: Alai (west and central).

 

tadjika Grum-Grshimaïlo, 1890 (Satyrus). Mémoires sur les Lépidoptères, Saint-Pétersbourg, 4: 234. TL: "Karateguine: Atchik-Alma, Sourchab". Had been originally described as a good species.

·          tadjika Grum-Grshimaïlo, 1890 (Satyrus). D: West Pamir; Darvaz; South Gissar; Alai (only in Transalai Mts.).

 

Revue française de Lépidopterologie, Paris, 13: 42. TS: Hipparchia pelopea Klug, 1832.

 

alpina Staudinger, 1878 (Satyrus). Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, Sankt-Petersburg, 14: 281. TL: "Kurusch / Cauc." – by the lectotype (Nekrutenko, 1990: 179). Had been originally described as a variety of pelopea.

·          alpina Staudinger, 1878 (Satyrus). D: Daghestan (south).

·          rjabovi Sheljuzhko, 1935 (Satyrus). Folia zoologia  hydrobiologia, Riga, 8: 299. TL: "Daghestan / Levashi" – by the lectotype (Nekrutenko, 1990: 179). Had been originally described as a subspecies of guriensis. D: Daghestan (north).

·          strandi Sheljuzhko, 1935 (Satyrus). Folia zoologia  hydrobiologia, Riga, 8: 301. TL: "vom Kistinka-Flusse". Had been originally described as a subspecies of guriensis. D: Daghestan (central).

·          tshetverikovi Sheljuzhko, 1935 (Satyrus). Folia zoologia  hydrobiologia, Riga, 8: 300. TL: "Teberda" – by the lectotype (Nekrutenko, 1990: 179). Had been originally described as a subspecies of guriensis. D: Great Caucasus; Small Caucasus; Transcaucasus.

 

aurantiaca Staudinger, 1871 (Satyrus). Catalog der Lepidopteren des palaearktischen Faunengebietes, Berlin (Aufl. 2): 54. TL: North Iran. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          aurantiaca Staudinger, 1871 (Satyrus). D: Central Kopet Dagh.

 

baldiva Moore, 1865 (Lasiommata). Proceedings of the zoological Society of London, 1865: 499 – 500. TL: “Spiti and Tibet”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·        ssp? D: Western parts of Severo-Alichursky, Yuzhno-Alichursky and Vakhansky Mts.

 

beroe Herrich-Schäffer, [1844] (Satyrus). Systematische Bearbeitung der Schmetterlinge von Europa, zugleich als Text, Revision und Supplement zu Jakob Hübner's Sammlung europäischer Schmetterlinge. Umrisstafeln mit Erklärung. Nachträge. Systema Lepidopterorum. Index alphabetico-synonymicus ad Vol. I – V. Index universalis specierum et generum, Regensburg, 6: 74; Tab. 23, Fig. 108 – 111. TL: Konstantinopol. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          beroe Herrich-Schäffer, [1844] (Satyrus). D: South Transcaucasus.

 

daghestana Holik, 1955 (Satyrus). Zeitschrift für Lepidopterologie, 3: 176; Taf. 10, Fig. 1, 2, 5, 6. TL: "Gunib, Nord-Daghestan". Had been originally described as a subspecies of geyeri.

·          daghestana Holik, 1955 (Satyrus). D: Eastern part of Great Caucasus.

·          zangezura Nekrutenko, 1989 (Pseudochazara). Vestnik zoologii, Kiev, 1989 (1): 16; ris. 2. TL: "НахичеванскаяАССР, Зангезурскийхр., Биченек, 2100 – 2300 м" [Nakhichevan ASSR, Zangezur Mts., Bichenek, 2100 – 2300 m]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of daghestana. D: Only known from Zangezur Mts.

 

droshica Tytler, 1926 (Eumenis). Journal of Bombay natural History Society, 31: 256. (Satyrus). TL: "Drosh, South Chitral and in the Shandur Pass, North-East Chitral". Had been originally described as a subspecies of lehana.

·          atambegi Wyatt & Omoto, 1966 (Satyrus). Entomops, Nice, 5: 161. TL: “Bala Quran, Anjuman V., Badachshan, 2,900 – 3,200 m”. Had been originally described as a subspecies of baldiva. D: Western part of Vakhansky Mts.

·          badachshana Wyatt & Omoto, 1966 (Satyrus). Entomops, Nice, 5: 162. TL: "Shiva Mts." Had been originally described as a good species. D: West Pamir: Yuzhno-Alichursky, Vanch, Shugnan, Shakhdarinsky and Ishkashimsky mountain ridges; Darvaz Mts.

·          rajevskyi Tshikolovets, 1996 (Pseudochazara). Journal of the Ukrainian entomological Society, Kiev, 2 (2): 39 – 42; ris. 6, 12. TL: "Таджикистан, Памир, Северо-Аличурскийхр., 5 кмвосточнеек. Баргадив, 3000 м" [Tadzhikistan, Pamir, Severo-Alichursky Mts., 5 km eastern of kishlak Bargadiv, 3000 m]. Had been originally described as a subspecies of droshica. D: TL and Sarezskoe lake vicinity, Irkht bay.

Remark. Unfortunately I did not see any specimensof this taxon. As it is visible from original figures in the description of rajevskyi, this taxon differs from all known subspecies of  droshica not only drowing  of wings and size, but also and form of androconial spots. More probably everything, it is a good species, but, as I did not see any specimen of  rajevskyi, here its status is accepted as subspecific.

 

euxina Kusnezov, 1909 (Hipparchia). Ezhegodnik zoologicheskogo museja imperatorskoj Akademii nauk, Sankt-Petersburg, 14: 141; pl. 3, figs. 1 – 6. TL: Southern slopes of Aj-Petri (Crimea). Had been originally described as a good species.

·          euxina Kusnezov, 1909 (Hipparchia). D: Only known from its type locality.

 

geyeri Herrich-Schäffer, [1846] (Satyrus). Systematische Bearbeitung der Schmetterlinge von Europa, zugleich als Text, Revision und Supplement zu Jakob Hübner's Sammlung europäischer Schmetterlinge. Umrisstafeln mit Erklärung. Nachträge. Systema Lepidopterorum. Index alphabetico-synonymicus ad Vol. I – V. Index universalis specierum et generum, Regensburg, 6: Tab. 62, Fig. 301, 302. TL: Ararat. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          karsicola Gross, 1978 (Pseudochazara). Atalanta, Würzburg, 9: 52; Abb. 8, j. TL: "Kars, Wälde südlich von Sarikamis, 2200 – 2300 m". Had been originally described as a subspecies of geyeri. D: Armenia: vicinity of localities Antarut, Zakhkadzor and Shorzha.

 

esperi Koçak, 1981 (Pseudochazara). Priamus, Ankara, 1: 78. TL: South Russia. Had been originally described as a good species.

Remark. The name Papilio hippolyte Esper, [1784] is junior primary homonym of the name Papilio hippolyte Drury, 1782 (Koçak, 1981; Lukhtanov & Lukhtanov, 1994). Koçak has offered to replace the name of Esper with the name esperi Koçak, 1981; Lukhtanov & Lukhtanov have offered to keep the name of Esper  as it strongly has come in a scientific revolution. Necessity of replacement of the name hippolyte Esp. is dictated by Art. 57 (b) of the International Code of the Zoological Nomenclature. Inside a species designated by Esper as hippolyte, were described var. mercurius Staudinger, 1887, var. pallida Staudinger, 1901 and var. williamsi Romei, 1927. Them taxonomic status is not determined yet. At the analysis of variability of attributes of a wing pattern and structure of genitalia of  species of Pseudochazara close to hippolyte (P. turkestana (Grum-Grshimailo, 1893), P. euxina (Kusnezov, 1909), P. kopetdaghi Dubatolov, 1989, P. kanishka Aussem, 1980, P. droshica (Tytler, 1912), P. badachshana Wyatt and Omoto, 1966, P. rajevskyi Tshikolovets, 1996, P. alpina (Staudinger, 1878), P. beroe (Herrich-Schäffer, [1844]), P. mamurra (Herrich-Schäffer, [1844])), which status is well argued (Aussem, 1980; Coutsis, 1990; Dubatolov, 1989; Gross, 1978; Hesselbarth, 1987; Hesselbarth et al., 1995; Lukhtanov & Lukhtanov, 1995; Nekrutenko, 1985 a, 1990; Tshikolovets, 1996) has appeared, that for definition of the status of taxa inside group hippolyte it is best to use the following attributes: a) the form of an androconial field and b) the form of a submarginal belt on a forewing of the male. Attributes of genitalia are very variable. Being based on these attributes, I have come to the following: 1) specimens of  hippolyte from the type locality differ by an extensive androconial field of silvery-grey colour partially laying in a discal cell, partially – at anal of border of a wing, bordered with a submarginal belt; the belt has distinct narrowing on internal and two narrowings on the external party (are investigated 158 males); 2) specimens of  var. williamsi (type locality: "Sierra-Nevada" in Spain) (19 males are investigated) differ by an extensive androconial spot of grey colour which however never comes into a discal cell; the submarginal belt visible already, than at hippolyte also has narroving in the central part; 3) specimens of  var. mercurius (95 males are investigated) differ by a narrow bright – black androconial spot coming in a discal cell and occupying about 1/4 its part; a submarginal belt a straight line, without seen narrovings; 4) specimens of var. pallida (12 males are investigated) differ by a narrow bright-black androconial spot divided with veins into 4 parts; an external part of a submarginal belt without precise narrowings, its internal part with two good visible narrowings. All listed above attributes are very stable and practically are not subject to variability and allow confidently to speak about specific independence of each of analyzed taxa. Therefore Pseudochazara williamsi (Romei, 1927), stat.n. That all specified taxa are  good species, follows, that it is impossible to apply to a taxon hippolyte as replacing any of these names; the homonimy, thus, should be eliminated by a unique possible way – establishment of the new name, as was made by Koçak.

·          adjuncta Korb, 1997 (Pseudochazara). Lambillionea, Bruxelles, 97: 519 – 520; Abbn. 3, 4. TL: "Südural, Egoza-Berg". Had been originally described as a subspecies of hippolyte. D: South Ural.

·          esperi Koçak, 1981 (Pseudochazara). D: South of European part; Northern Kazakhstan.

 

kanishka Aussem, 1980 (Pseudochazara). Nota lepidopterologica, 3: 5 – 12. TL: "Tang-e-Tachqurghan", "Kotal-e-Rabatak". Had been originally described as a good species.

·          kanishka Aussem, 1980 (Pseudochazara). D: Mountains in the middle course of Pjandzh river (Tshikolovets, 1996: 38).

 

kopetdaghi Dubatolov, 1989 (Pseudochazara). Proceedings of the Zoological Institute, Leningrad, 200: 138 – 139; ris. 2 – 6. TL: "Туркмения, Центральный Копетдаг, 15 км З Фирюзы, гора Душак, 2100 м" [Turkmenia, Central Kopet Dagh, 15 km W Firuza, Dushak Mt., 2100 m]. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          kopetdaghi Dubatolov, 1989 (Pseudochazara). D: Central Kopet Dagh.

 

lehana Moore, 1878 (Satyrus). Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1878: 452. TL: Ladak. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          ssp? D: West Pamir.

 

mamurra Herrich-Schäffer, [1844] (Satyrus). Systematische Bearbeitung der Schmetterlinge von Europa, zugleich als Text, Revision und Supplement zu Jakob Hübner's Sammlung europäischer Schmetterlinge. Umrisstafeln mit Erklärung. Nachträge. Systema Lepidopterorum. Index alphabetico-synonymicus ad Vol. I – V. Index universalis specierum et generum, Regensburg, 6: Fig. 314 – 315. TL: Turkey. Had been originally described as a good species.

·            schachrudensis Staudinger, 1881 (Satyrus). Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, Sankt-Petersburg, 16: 69. TL: Shakhrud. Had been originally described as a form of pelopea. D: South Transcaucasus.

 

mercurius Staudinger, 1887 (Satyrus). Stettiner entomologische Zeitschrift,  48: 58. TL: "Alexander-Gebirge". Had been originally described as a variety of hippolyte.

·          mercurius Staudinger, 1887 (Satyrus). D: North Tian Shan; Dzhungaria.

 

mniszechii Herrich-Schäffer, [1852] (Satyrus). Systematische Bearbeitung der Schmetterlinge von Europa, zugleich als Text, Revision und Supplement zu Jakob Hübner's Sammlung europäischer Schmetterlinge. Umrisstafeln mit Erklärung. Nachträge. Systema Lepidopterorum. Index alphabetico-synonymicus ad Vol. I – V. Index universalis specierum et generum, Regensburg, 6: 14; Tab. 6, Fig. 577 – 579. TL: Turkey. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          caucasica Lederer, 1864 (Satyrus). Wiener entomologische Monatsschrift, 8: 168; Taf. 3, Fig. 5. TL: Abastumani. Had been originally described as a variety of pelopea. D: Caucasus; Transcaucasus.

 

nukatli Bogdanov, 2000 (Pseudochazara). Helios, Moscow, 1: 111 - 112. TL: “Verkhny Gunib, Nukatl’ Mts., 2000 m, Daghestan Rep., Russia”. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          nukatli Bogdanov, 2000 (Pseudochazara). D: TL.

 

pakistana Gross, 1978 (Pseudochazara). Atalanta, Würzburg, 9: 54. TL: Pakistan. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          pakistana Gross, 1978 (Pseudochazara). D: West Pamir.

 

pallida Staudinger, 1901 (Satyrus). Catalog der Lepidopteren des Palaearktischen Faunengebietes, Berlin (Aufl. 1): 14. TL: “Altai”. Had been originally described as a variety of hippolyte.

·          pallida Staudinger, 1901 (Satyrus). D: SW Altai.

 

panjshira Wyatt & Omoto, 1966 (Pseudochazara). Entomops, Nice, 5: 160; fig. TL: "Dasht-i-Riwat, lower Panjshir Valley, 2,200 m". Had been originally described as a subspecies of baldiva.

·          panjshira Wyatt & Omoto, 1966 (Pseudochazara). D: Alai; West Pamir.

 

pelopea Klug, [1832] (Papilio). Symbolae physicae seu icones et descriptiones insectorum quae ex itinere per Africam borealem et Asiam occidentalem Friderici Guilelmi Hemprich et Christiani Godfredi Ehrenberg studio novae aut illustrate redierunt, Berolini: k; Tab. 29, Fig. 5 – 8. TL: Lebanon. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          persica Christoph, 1877 (Satyrus). Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, Sankt-Petersburg, 12: 201. TL: "bei Schahrud". Had been originally described as a variety of pelopea. D: Small Caucasus; Transcaucasus; Kopet Dagh?

 

sagina Heyne, [1894] (Satyrus). Die palaearktische Grossschmetterlinge und ihre Naturgeschichte, Leipzig, 1: 542. TL: “Turkestan”. Had been originally described as a variety of lehana.

·          sagina Heyne, [1894]. D: West Pamir; Gissar; Darwaz.

 

thelephassa Geyer in Hübner, [1827] (Eumenis). Sammlung europäischer Schmetterlinge, Augsburg: Taf. [85], fig. 1 – 4. TL: Not stated [Asia Minor]. Had been originally described as a good species.

·          thelephassa Geyer in Hübner, [1827] (Eumenis). D: Armenia; Talysh; Kopet Dagh.

 

turkestana Grum-Grshimailo, 1893 (Satyrus). Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, Sankt-Petersburg, 27: 384. TL: "in montibus Turkestaniae et in Thian-schan orientali". Had been originally described as a variety of lehana.

·          tarbagata Staudinger, 1901 (Satyrus). Catalog der Lepidopteren des palaearktischen Faunengebietes, Berlin (ed. 3), 1: 57. TL: Tarbagatai. Had been originally described as a variety of baldiva. D: South Altai; Tarbagatai; Saur; Dzhungaria.

·          turkestana Grum-Grshimailo, 1893 (Satyrus). D: Tian Shan; Alai.